<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New research published on MBH98</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2005/01/27/new-research-published-on-mbh98/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/01/27/new-research-published-on-mbh98/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:19:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCO</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/01/27/new-research-published-on-mbh98/#comment-31522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TCO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=11#comment-31522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s the rationale for the 2 different publications?  How do the journals compare?

How did MBH amend the gaspe series and do you think it is better to use their version of Gaspe or the other (and why)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the rationale for the 2 different publications?  How do the journals compare?</p>
<p>How did MBH amend the gaspe series and do you think it is better to use their version of Gaspe or the other (and why)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
