Comments on: Climateaudit http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/03/climateaudit/ by Steve McIntyre Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, part 1: In the beginning « Deep Climate http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/03/climateaudit/#comment-219687 Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:39:08 +0000 /?p=13#comment-219687 [...] started his ClimateAudit blog on February 3 and pointed to Post coverage the same day. In the following days, the Post continued to give him [...]

]]> By: Steve McIntyre http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/03/climateaudit/#comment-31526 Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:23:50 +0000 /?p=13#comment-31526 test

]]> By: Steve McIntyre http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/03/climateaudit/#comment-31525 Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:22:40 +0000 /?p=13#comment-31525 Thanks, although we’re not setting forth our own view of climate history – merely arguing that you can’t obtain one from MBH98 (and thus MBH99, which splices onto MBH98). Steve Mc

]]> By: SPQR http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/03/climateaudit/#comment-31524 Sun, 06 Feb 2005 05:22:25 +0000 /?p=13#comment-31524 Like Jeff, I’m a grateful fan of your work. We’ve followed this issue extensively at the Debunkers forum.

]]> By: Jeff Norman http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/03/climateaudit/#comment-31523 Fri, 04 Feb 2005 06:58:50 +0000 /?p=13#comment-31523 Thank you for the hard work you have put in over the last few years. I had always suspected that the Hockey Stick was a misrepresentation of climate history. It is nice to see these suspicions confirmed, though I feel the PCA argument is a little like eventually indicting Al Capone for tax evasion.

Jeff

]]>