<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Post-1980 Proxies #1: Twisted Tree Heartrot Hill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Survivorship Bias « Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/#comment-372498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Survivorship Bias « Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-372498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Down Quadratic  Twisted Tree Heartrot Hill  Wilmking in Alaska Positive and Negative Responders bender on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Down Quadratic  Twisted Tree Heartrot Hill  Wilmking in Alaska Positive and Negative Responders bender on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on Positive and Negative Responders « Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/#comment-372494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More on Positive and Negative Responders « Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-372494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in Alaska and Positive and Negative Responders. Other related posts include Upside Down Quadratic, Twisted Tree Heartrot Hill , bender on Gaspé  Survivorship Bias [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Alaska and Positive and Negative Responders. Other related posts include Upside Down Quadratic, Twisted Tree Heartrot Hill , bender on Gaspé  Survivorship Bias [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upside-Down Quadratic Proxy Response « Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/#comment-372486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Upside-Down Quadratic Proxy Response « Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-372486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] White Spruce at Northern Treeline The decline of ring widths with increasing temperatures was reported in D&#8217;Arrigo et al [2004], about which I reported briefly here: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] White Spruce at Northern Treeline The decline of ring widths with increasing temperatures was reported in D&#8217;Arrigo et al [2004], about which I reported briefly here: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sadlov</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/#comment-31899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Sadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-31899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I recall correctly, 1997 and 98 were El Nino years, with 97 being a stronger El Nino. I also seem to recall that by December of 98, we were flipping into a La Nina, based on the fact that it snowed at my house (~1000&#039; elevation, very close to the ocean). I certainly witnessed lots of growth in my location - 100 % due to moisture. I would also reckon that meanwhile, up in Alaska, there would have been a moisture deficit especially away from the coast, until early &#039;99. Are trees more of an ENSO proxy than a temperature proxy?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall correctly, 1997 and 98 were El Nino years, with 97 being a stronger El Nino. I also seem to recall that by December of 98, we were flipping into a La Nina, based on the fact that it snowed at my house (~1000&#8242; elevation, very close to the ocean). I certainly witnessed lots of growth in my location &#8211; 100 % due to moisture. I would also reckon that meanwhile, up in Alaska, there would have been a moisture deficit especially away from the coast, until early &#8217;99. Are trees more of an ENSO proxy than a temperature proxy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Erren</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/#comment-31898</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans Erren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-31898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[re 6:
like this one
http://home.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/pfisterbgaden.gif
http://home.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/errenvsluterbacher.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re 6:<br />
like this one<br />
<a href="http://home.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/pfisterbgaden.gif" rel="nofollow">http://home.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/pfisterbgaden.gif</a><br />
<a href="http://home.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/errenvsluterbacher.htm" rel="nofollow">http://home.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/errenvsluterbacher.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCO</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/#comment-31897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TCO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-31897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The key issue which we seem to keep coming back to, is how to calibrate ring width as a proxy at all.  This should be based on current observations...not backed out from gridcell comparisons or the like.   I mean real botanical laboratory style observations.  These are important calibrative type studies.  I would think that any single series that goes back in time or any temp reconstruction would refer to such calibrative studies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key issue which we seem to keep coming back to, is how to calibrate ring width as a proxy at all.  This should be based on current observations&#8230;not backed out from gridcell comparisons or the like.   I mean real botanical laboratory style observations.  These are important calibrative type studies.  I would think that any single series that goes back in time or any temp reconstruction would refer to such calibrative studies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/#comment-31896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve McIntyre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 17:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-31896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Murray, I&#039;m glad you brought this post back on the screen. I get the impression that quite a few of the &quot;missing&quot; tree ring proxy studies of the 1990s look like this. That&#039;s why we hear about glacier recession and not tree rings now.  The archived Jacoby sites are all south-facing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murray, I&#8217;m glad you brought this post back on the screen. I get the impression that quite a few of the &#8220;missing&#8221; tree ring proxy studies of the 1990s look like this. That&#8217;s why we hear about glacier recession and not tree rings now.  The archived Jacoby sites are all south-facing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray Duffin</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/#comment-31895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murray Duffin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-31895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is interesting that the Maunder and Dalton minima are clearly visible, as well as the post 1930s cooling. More evidence that Maunder and Dalton were not just northern Europe phenomena.  Murray]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that the Maunder and Dalton minima are clearly visible, as well as the post 1930s cooling. More evidence that Maunder and Dalton were not just northern Europe phenomena.  Murray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/#comment-31894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-31894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone have links or info that correlates tree ring patterns to temperature? I always thought the rings were wider in wetter years, and thinner in drier ones. And I&#039;d love to see some info on how this ties into global warming.

Thanks,
Ed..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have links or info that correlates tree ring patterns to temperature? I always thought the rings were wider in wetter years, and thinner in drier ones. And I&#8217;d love to see some info on how this ties into global warming.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Ed..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Funk</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/15/post-1980-proxies-1-twisted-tree-heartrot-hill/#comment-31893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Funk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=67#comment-31893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other issue that Mann always brings up is local data vs the sum of world data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other issue that Mann always brings up is local data vs the sum of world data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
