<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climateaudit.org mentioned as science resource!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/16/climateauditorg-mentioned-as-science-resource/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/16/climateauditorg-mentioned-as-science-resource/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCO</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/16/climateauditorg-mentioned-as-science-resource/#comment-31902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TCO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=69#comment-31902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aren&#039;t all these toolbars worthless adware/spyware.  evil.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aren&#8217;t all these toolbars worthless adware/spyware.  evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime Arbona</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/16/climateauditorg-mentioned-as-science-resource/#comment-31901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaime Arbona]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=69#comment-31901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What! CA appears with New Scientist and Scientific American? And Real Climate, too? No wonder they called it Sience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What! CA appears with New Scientist and Scientific American? And Real Climate, too? No wonder they called it Sience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lubo Motl</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/16/climateauditorg-mentioned-as-science-resource/#comment-31900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lubo Motl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=69#comment-31900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations. Sience is not quite science, but it&#039;s not bad either. ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations. Sience is not quite science, but it&#8217;s not bad either. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
