<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hendrik Tennekes, retired Director of Research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/22/hendrik-tennekes-retired-director-of-research-royal-netherlands-meteorological-institute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/22/hendrik-tennekes-retired-director-of-research-royal-netherlands-meteorological-institute/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rik</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/02/22/hendrik-tennekes-retired-director-of-research-royal-netherlands-meteorological-institute/#comment-32118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=94#comment-32118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wondering... I once read a book on chaos, which started with Lorenz&#039;s butterfly (thoroughly explained). I just can&#039;t remember if the butterfly of Lorenz draws upon the classical chaos of classical systems. Classical systems are closed systems and the earth is (I think) not a closed system. The real paradigm shift has been from &#039;classical&#039; to &#039;quantum mechanics&#039;. With the latter you&#039;d still get chaos, but it would be a characteristic of complexity, not &#039;sensitive to initial conditions&#039; and so on. At least, that&#039;s what I think...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering&#8230; I once read a book on chaos, which started with Lorenz&#8217;s butterfly (thoroughly explained). I just can&#8217;t remember if the butterfly of Lorenz draws upon the classical chaos of classical systems. Classical systems are closed systems and the earth is (I think) not a closed system. The real paradigm shift has been from &#8216;classical&#8217; to &#8216;quantum mechanics&#8217;. With the latter you&#8217;d still get chaos, but it would be a characteristic of complexity, not &#8216;sensitive to initial conditions&#8217; and so on. At least, that&#8217;s what I think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
