Comments on: Mann on Source Code

By: More on Requests for Data « Climate Audit

More on Requests for Data « Climate Audit — Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:02:57 +0000

[...] not be "intimidated" into releasing his algorithm, I posted the following overview on our requests for source code to show that there had been no "intimidation". Such language from these guys – Mann [...]

By: Early McI – Mann Correspondence — MBH « The Policy Lass

Early McI – Mann Correspondence — MBH « The Policy Lass — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:22:24 +0000

[...] Mann Correspondence — MBH March 7, 2010 shewonk Leave a comment Go to comments Here’s a CA post that refers to correspondence between McI and Mann re data. Mann told Antonio Regalado of the Wall Street Journal that he would not be “intimidated” into [...]

By: Rob Kaper

Rob Kaper — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:25:43 +0000

It saddens me so many people take black box research for granted. Obviously peer review doesn’t guarantee perfection nor does secrecy rule it out, but any claim that isn’t verifiable is simply not scientific.

By: Jeff Norman

Jeff Norman — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:09:11 +0000

Are the following mistakes in Margaret Leinen’s letter in the original correspondence or were these transcription errors?
- "… general premise of tour(sic) letter …"
- "… scientific data obtained with public funks(sic)."
- "… a wealth of paleoclimatic data that its(sic) organized by scientific subspecialty …"
- "In an instance for which you may not yet be aware,"
- "… that addresses concerned(sic) raised by you …"

Jeff
Steve: My bad. except for the second-last. I’ve corrected the typos. It came in a non-extracting pdf and I transcribed it quickly for a collation. I’ve put up the pdf for comparison, linked from the transcribed version.

By: Spence_UK

Spence_UK — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:32:05 +0000

The link "our correspondence after MM03" seems to be broken – I tried changing the comma to a full stop but it still didn’t seem to work?

Steve: Fixed