Comments on: Wahl and Amman: More http://climateaudit.org/2005/05/15/wahl-and-amman-more/ by Steve McIntyre Mon, 20 May 2013 03:03:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Reconciling to Wahl and Ammann « Climate Audit http://climateaudit.org/2005/05/15/wahl-and-amman-more/#comment-280418 Mon, 30 May 2011 16:16:26 +0000 /?p=211#comment-280418 [...] script first came out, I was able to immediately reconcile our results to theirs – see here. As Wegman later said: when using the same proxies as and the same methodology as MM, Wahl and [...]

]]> By: Louis Hissink http://climateaudit.org/2005/05/15/wahl-and-amman-more/#comment-33638 Tue, 17 May 2005 04:34:41 +0000 /?p=211#comment-33638 Steve: Thanks, by the way I am going to scan in an article from the latest Australian Institute of Geoscientists newsletter – THAT graph has appeared! Could send me the addy to send it to you please?

]]> By: Louis Hissink http://climateaudit.org/2005/05/15/wahl-and-amman-more/#comment-33637 Mon, 16 May 2005 12:23:11 +0000 /?p=211#comment-33637 Reminds me of statistics, statistics, and …..hmmmm

]]> By: Louis Hissink http://climateaudit.org/2005/05/15/wahl-and-amman-more/#comment-33636 Mon, 16 May 2005 12:10:51 +0000 /?p=211#comment-33636 Steve, What is the primary data showing temperature vs time that these calculations show?

Steve: Louis, this is just the original MBH98 calculations, which is mostly derived from tree rings, especially in the earlier portions – where it mostly reflects bristlecone pine growth.

]]> By: John A. http://climateaudit.org/2005/05/15/wahl-and-amman-more/#comment-33635 Sun, 15 May 2005 20:31:26 +0000 /?p=211#comment-33635 …and weird stuff starts happening at the beginning of the 15th Century.

]]>