Comments on: House of Representatives Committee

By: Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, part 2: The real story behind the Barton/Whitfield investigation and the Wegman Panel « Deep Climate

Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:24:56 +0000

[...] how McIntyre announced the letters on his website: Several people have drawn attention to letters from the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and [...]

By: Vigrx

Vigrx — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:53:13 +0000

Chill to mill and fill the drill of success with vigrx plus -
http://www.vigrx-plus.net

By: buy viagra

buy viagra — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:19:32 +0000

All fine plus nine equal to not fine.

By: jae

jae — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:52:49 +0000

Roger: link missing.

By: Roger Bell

Roger Bell — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:11:26 +0000

Steve, This is an extended discussion about global warming - earth's atmosphere only 1/3 as sensitive to CO2 as IPCC suggest:

By: Breast Enlargement

Breast Enlargement — Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:49:54 +0000

Nice site I found … Plan on coming back later to spend a little time there.

By: Frank H. Scammell

Frank H. Scammell — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:15:49 +0000

Steve,- You’ve done a great job. Congratulations! However, I have a suggestion. In A Summary of MBH98 Replication Issues you list a whole slew of issues with MBH. If you could generate a series of slides that show w/ and w/o effects of each of the points, I think it would be of great use to a lot of people. You have concentrated on a particular time interval, but in my opinion, the biggest problem lies with the merging of the historical record with the “instrumental record”. Just showing the differences of the historical record w/ and w/o merging of “instrumental record” and the balloon and satellite record ( as you have previously done, really puts the whole Global Warming issue in perspective, especially if you maintain the anomaly (suppressed) scaling the same. Yes, this does confront the Dr. Hansen contingent directly, but the time has come.

By: John Hekman

John Hekman — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:26:31 +0000

Michael Mann complained of intimidation. Now he really has something to complain about. If his data and algorithm now see the daylight, we will almost certainly be treated to more editorials in the NYT saying that the study was “fake, but accurate.” Reading the letters from the committee, I was suddenly transported into a 1950s western, and heard the cavalry charging in to save the day. It is not over yet, but I do not see how this request can be stonewalled, and if it is, it will be just as bad for them.

By: Hans Erren

Hans Erren — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:26:31 +0000

The ad-hom-and-smear-campaign has started
http://davidappell.com/archives/00000840.htm
http://timlambert.org/2005/06/barton

By: John Brignell

John Brignell — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:18:47 +0000

I have made my comment at:
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/2005%20June.htm#Bluff
well done!Steve: John, thank you for stopping in and for the kind references at numberwatch. We’re getting quite a bit of traffic from numberwatch. Cheers, StevePS for others: People who enjoy John’s way with words will also enjoy John Mortimer’s Rumpole stories; I’ve read all of them.