<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chronicle on Barton Letters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/01/chronicle-on-barton-letters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/01/chronicle-on-barton-letters/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCO</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/01/chronicle-on-barton-letters/#comment-34323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TCO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=245#comment-34323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not crazy about voice of god replies.  And JohnA with his more minor status should be forbidden entirely from such amplifications...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not crazy about voice of god replies.  And JohnA with his more minor status should be forbidden entirely from such amplifications&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hunter</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/01/chronicle-on-barton-letters/#comment-34322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 03:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=245#comment-34322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve:

You said in your email to Richard Monastersky:



Can we infer from this that neither you nor Ross McKitrick has ever had contact with Joe Barton?

John Hunter

&lt;strong&gt;Steve:&lt;/strong&gt;  As I said in the email to Monastersky:  &quot;I was contacted by a staffer for the House Committee for confirmation following the report in the Wall Street Journal that Mann et al. had refused to release important portions of their source code.  At no time were either Dr McKitrick or myself ever asked to help in framing the requests for information in the Barton letters nor did we do so.&quot;   You should be careful what you &quot;infer&quot;.  However in this case you inferred correctly; our contacts were limited to a staffer and we were never in contact with Joe Barton. At present I am busy going through the various new documents and will not be able to respond to your taunts or cross-examination and will not post any such comments by you for 2 weeks, although non-taunting non-cross-examining comments are welcome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve:</p>
<p>You said in your email to Richard Monastersky:</p>
<p>Can we infer from this that neither you nor Ross McKitrick has ever had contact with Joe Barton?</p>
<p>John Hunter</p>
<p><strong>Steve:</strong>  As I said in the email to Monastersky:  &#8220;I was contacted by a staffer for the House Committee for confirmation following the report in the Wall Street Journal that Mann et al. had refused to release important portions of their source code.  At no time were either Dr McKitrick or myself ever asked to help in framing the requests for information in the Barton letters nor did we do so.&#8221;   You should be careful what you &#8220;infer&#8221;.  However in this case you inferred correctly; our contacts were limited to a staffer and we were never in contact with Joe Barton. At present I am busy going through the various new documents and will not be able to respond to your taunts or cross-examination and will not post any such comments by you for 2 weeks, although non-taunting non-cross-examining comments are welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/01/chronicle-on-barton-letters/#comment-34321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2005 12:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=245#comment-34321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I were Joe Barton, or other members of the Committee, and saw hysterical reactions such as these to a simple request for transparency that most politicians would find innocuous, &lt;strong&gt;then I&#039;d know I was on to something&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were Joe Barton, or other members of the Committee, and saw hysterical reactions such as these to a simple request for transparency that most politicians would find innocuous, <strong>then I&#8217;d know I was on to something</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
