<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Requests for Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/02/more-on-requests-for-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/02/more-on-requests-for-data/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NSF on Jones&#8217; Email Destruction Enterprise &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/02/more-on-requests-for-data/#comment-301914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NSF on Jones&#8217; Email Destruction Enterprise &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=248#comment-301914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] than of the grant recipients who abused their compliance responsibilities (for example, see here , here.) I will try to review their conduct in a future post as well, as some of NSF’s most [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than of the grant recipients who abused their compliance responsibilities (for example, see here , here.) I will try to review their conduct in a future post as well, as some of NSF’s most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NSF on Jones&#8217; Email Deletion Enterprise &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/02/more-on-requests-for-data/#comment-301908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NSF on Jones&#8217; Email Deletion Enterprise &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=248#comment-301908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] than of the grant recipients who abused their compliance responsibilities (for example, see here , here.) I will try to review their conduct in a future post as well, as some of NSF’s most [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than of the grant recipients who abused their compliance responsibilities (for example, see here , here.) I will try to review their conduct in a future post as well, as some of NSF’s most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Request to NAS &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/02/more-on-requests-for-data/#comment-245233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Data Request to NAS &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=248#comment-245233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] many of the posts on data archiving and requests. A review from this time last year is here . Since then, I&#8217;ve had correspondence with Moberg and Nature, which has resulted in winkling [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] many of the posts on data archiving and requests. A review from this time last year is here . Since then, I&#8217;ve had correspondence with Moberg and Nature, which has resulted in winkling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lister</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/02/more-on-requests-for-data/#comment-34344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Lister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=248#comment-34344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you filed any FOIA requests?  If you do, they can&#039;t ignore you/brush you off.  They are a federal angency and they either must comply or explain why you, as the requestor, are not legally entitled to the data.  If they are then they must send you the data, which assumes they have it.  I&#039;m not sure what would happen if they entrust the data to the contracting grantee but it would be intersting to see their response posted here on this blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you filed any FOIA requests?  If you do, they can&#8217;t ignore you/brush you off.  They are a federal angency and they either must comply or explain why you, as the requestor, are not legally entitled to the data.  If they are then they must send you the data, which assumes they have it.  I&#8217;m not sure what would happen if they entrust the data to the contracting grantee but it would be intersting to see their response posted here on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
