<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AAAS Letter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/15/aaas-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/15/aaas-letter/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/15/aaas-letter/#comment-225118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=263#comment-225118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[climateaudit.org, how do you do it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>climateaudit.org, how do you do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCO</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/15/aaas-letter/#comment-34570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TCO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=263#comment-34570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s ridiculous of a science org to defend the people who are hiding methods and attack the people who are trying to get them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ridiculous of a science org to defend the people who are hiding methods and attack the people who are trying to get them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/15/aaas-letter/#comment-34569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=263#comment-34569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s amazing how Mann and so many others cite the 2001 IPCC report&#039;s suggestion of a &quot;discernable&quot; influence of human emissions on climate as an &quot;overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change&quot; where &quot;recent warming is due in large part to human influences&quot;.  Even if the earth is warming they commit a basic logical fallacy, the classic hallmark of pseudo-science and superstition:  that correllation is evidence of causation.  Then there&#039;s this gem he published on his own website:  (http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=114)

&quot;In the spirit of this article, let&#039;s assume . . . that the &quot;signal&quot; of anthropogenic climate change has not yet emerged from the &quot;noise&quot; of natural variations (i.e., the above-cited &quot;discernible human influence&quot; had not been detected after all). Surely, then we wouldn&#039;t need to worry about global warming, and the world could hold off with the Kyoto protocol?  Unfortunately, that also doesn&#039;t follow. The only thing that would follow in that case is that our data are not yet good enough to prove that anthropogenic climate change is already happening.&quot;

Without even considering that human emissions contribute perhaps]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how Mann and so many others cite the 2001 IPCC report&#8217;s suggestion of a &#8220;discernable&#8221; influence of human emissions on climate as an &#8220;overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change&#8221; where &#8220;recent warming is due in large part to human influences&#8221;.  Even if the earth is warming they commit a basic logical fallacy, the classic hallmark of pseudo-science and superstition:  that correllation is evidence of causation.  Then there&#8217;s this gem he published on his own website:  (<a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=114" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=114</a>)</p>
<p>&#8220;In the spirit of this article, let&#8217;s assume . . . that the &#8220;signal&#8221; of anthropogenic climate change has not yet emerged from the &#8220;noise&#8221; of natural variations (i.e., the above-cited &#8220;discernible human influence&#8221; had not been detected after all). Surely, then we wouldn&#8217;t need to worry about global warming, and the world could hold off with the Kyoto protocol?  Unfortunately, that also doesn&#8217;t follow. The only thing that would follow in that case is that our data are not yet good enough to prove that anthropogenic climate change is already happening.&#8221;</p>
<p>Without even considering that human emissions contribute perhaps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mats Holmstràƒ⵭</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/15/aaas-letter/#comment-34568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mats Holmstràƒ⵭]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=263#comment-34568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an article on the Barton letters in the Washington Post.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/17/AR2005071701056_pf.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an article on the Barton letters in the Washington Post.<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/17/AR2005071701056_pf.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/17/AR2005071701056_pf.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Norman</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/15/aaas-letter/#comment-34567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Norman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=263#comment-34567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Start quote:
&quot;... let me state that my research findings, which support the conclusion that the earth&#039;s surface is warming, and that
 recent warming is due in large part to human influences, are consistent with the overwhelming scientific concensus on climate change.&quot;
End quote.

I&#039;m not getting the &quot;my research findings... support the conclusion... that recent warming is due in large part to human influences&quot;.

I look forward to Steve&#039;s interpretation of the rest.

Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Start quote:<br />
&#8220;&#8230; let me state that my research findings, which support the conclusion that the earth&#8217;s surface is warming, and that<br />
 recent warming is due in large part to human influences, are consistent with the overwhelming scientific concensus on climate change.&#8221;<br />
End quote.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not getting the &#8220;my research findings&#8230; support the conclusion&#8230; that recent warming is due in large part to human influences&#8221;.</p>
<p>I look forward to Steve&#8217;s interpretation of the rest.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2005/07/15/aaas-letter/#comment-34566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 05:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=263#comment-34566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FYI: Mann&#039;s response to the Barton letter is posted at http://www.realclimate.org/Mann_response_to_Barton.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI: Mann&#8217;s response to the Barton letter is posted at <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/Mann_response_to_Barton.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclimate.org/Mann_response_to_Barton.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
