Metaphors can be fun They don’t really advance the scientific debate though.

I’ve found your posts most entertaining.

1) You claim to “stop mud wrestling” with the pigs, yet jump back in the pen.

2) No statement was mad that ALL of your posts were not agreed to. Only the topic at hand.

3) It is clear that RC doesn’t allow dissenting views. To trumpet your ability to post without response doesn’t mean anything except that you don’t disagree with their theology (it can’t be science as they won’t let any but the initiated into their inner circle to see the Truth).

Please keep posting…

That’s incorrect. Most of what I’ve said on RC has not needed a response by one of the mods. Therefore, most of what I’ve written there has been agreed with.

This is not the same case with you.

Hey, look at me, I agree with realclimate!

My apologies to Peter Hearnden. To think I thought warmers didn’t have a sense of humor! Tell whoever this ‘Steven Berg’ really is that he had me on the floor laughing! I should have seen the signs in his earlier one-liners.

The all-caps pop-eyed fanatic impression is hilarious. The delicate irony of calling models projecting 300 years into the future science is especially witty and the final appeal saying in essence to ‘move on’ and realize that I will be assimilated is redolent with the aroma of mid-90s America. All in all a post to be remembered.

The media just laps up these extreme model results, but scientists know they should be surrounded by caveats. Even the RealClimate crowd, who are not afraid to provide half the story if it helps sell the warming theory, shy away from these kind of outputs. For another example, see:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=115

And please bear in mind that CLIMATE MODELS can be just as wrong as WEATHER MODELS whether caps lock is on or off.

THIS IS NOT JUNK SCIENCE, DAVE!!! It is scientifically-valid research! Get it through your head!