Comments on: Cutting Down the Oldest Living Tree in the World http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/ by Steve McIntyre Tue, 21 May 2013 15:32:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Behold the stump of Prometheus « Asian Correspondent http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/#comment-42109 Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:05:11 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=480#comment-42109 [...] by a graduate student and the US Forest Service in the name of science on August 6, 1964. Thanks to the research, they were able to confirm the Bristlecone Pine was around 5,000 years of age.The current oldest [...]

]]> By: Jim Bouldin http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/#comment-42108 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:27:51 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=480#comment-42108 In addition to the section at the GBNP visitor center, there is a large slab in the display case at the Ely Convention Center in Ely NV, and there are reportedly sections or pieces thereof at the U of AZ Tree Ring Lab and at the USFS’s Institute of Forest Genetics in Placerville CA. The original stump is in fairly good condition and could be read in situ with some surface treatment, although the pith is gone.

]]> By: Paul http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/#comment-42107 Sun, 22 Jan 2006 02:54:36 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=480#comment-42107 I wonder what Peter puts in his posts that get him spanked so regularly? Specific words? Sentences?

Peter, I’ve not seen much in your posts that would cause me to characterize them as spam. Any clues? I also haven’t seen much on this blog to think that censorship is the issue (but if it was, I’m sure we’d see something from Steve. As someone has said before, it’s Steve’s blog to do with what he wished).

]]> By: Steve McIntyre http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/#comment-42106 Sun, 22 Jan 2006 01:50:19 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=480#comment-42106 Pter gets caught up in Spam Karma from time to time; I’m not sure why. We’ve noted before that Spam Karma will then “retro-spank”. Usually, John A or notice this and recover it, but, the usual display is only the last 20 messages or so. There have been a fantastic number of spams recently – sometimes over 50 a day. So it’s possible that a posting got retro-spanked by Spam Karama and we didn’t notice it and it got lost. If so, I’m sorry, but we really need the Spam Karma to deal with the deluge of spam these days.

]]> By: Doug L http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/#comment-42105 Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:15:48 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=480#comment-42105 About bristlecones,

SurRealClimate has a new look, and a thread called “New Look”, with comments like:

“hey hey hey! Is this a kind of happy new year kind of new look? =) ”

so I just couldn’t resist posting the following over there on that thread.:

“Yubba dubba doo, a new look! How about a new look at bristlecones? :-) “

]]> By: John G. Bell http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/#comment-42104 Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:58:51 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=480#comment-42104 Doug L,
Thanks seems like Peter’s post didn’t get fetched by my akregator. I must have been off line for that part of that day. That or akregator doesn’t work like I thought.

Peter,
Your post was up for at least 7 hours. John A might have a copy. Even if it is lost to WordPress, he might be able to find it in his akregator cache.

]]> By: IL http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/#comment-42103 Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:38:09 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=480#comment-42103 Yep, I posted #5 and Peter definitely posted a response that I quoted. Its gone Captain, its definitely gone..

]]> By: Doug L http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/#comment-42102 Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:14:28 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=480#comment-42102 Whoops, I left out Re #26, 27 and while I’m at it, post #5 specifically refers to a post by Peter Hearnden.

“As Peter Hearden says, almost certainly in 40 years time people will look back to events of today with similar disbelief but that has to rank as a criminally stupid act. “

]]> By: Doug L http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/#comment-42101 Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:08:02 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=480#comment-42101 Post number seven refers to Peter’s post number three with his first name and a quote. The words ring a bell, and I recall them coming from Peter Hearnden.

]]> By: John G. Bell http://climateaudit.org/2006/01/03/cutting-down-the-oldest-living-tree-in-the-world/#comment-42100 Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:52:42 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=480#comment-42100 Re #26: Peter,
I have akregator fetching and saving every new post as it comes in. You would have to have posted under another name for me not to have found it with the search I just did. Was it on another thread?

All of TCO’s posts came to me with profanity fully intact… Hope he is OK.

]]>