<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Realclimate on O&amp;B</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willis Eschenbach</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/#comment-43621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willis Eschenbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-43621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-67054&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;#39&lt;/a&gt;, Proxy, you say:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Has anyone looked at using residential buildings as a temperature proxies? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not to my knowledge, nor could they. The problem is that our predecessors asked much less of their homes than we do. I live in the Hawaiian uplands, where it gets quite chilly. None of the homes built here 50 years ago have any form of heat, no fireplace, nothing. All the modern homes have heat.

Does this prove that Hawaii is cooling? ... Don&#039;t think so, just that the old paniolos were tougher than I am.

w.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-67054" rel="nofollow">#39</a>, Proxy, you say:</p>
<blockquote><p>Has anyone looked at using residential buildings as a temperature proxies? </p></blockquote>
<p>Not to my knowledge, nor could they. The problem is that our predecessors asked much less of their homes than we do. I live in the Hawaiian uplands, where it gets quite chilly. None of the homes built here 50 years ago have any form of heat, no fireplace, nothing. All the modern homes have heat.</p>
<p>Does this prove that Hawaii is cooling? &#8230; Don&#8217;t think so, just that the old paniolos were tougher than I am.</p>
<p>w.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark T</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/#comment-43620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-43620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Building materials that are good for warmer weather are also good for colder weather.  This means
the direction of the correlation would be ambiguous.

Mark]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building materials that are good for warmer weather are also good for colder weather.  This means<br />
the direction of the correlation would be ambiguous.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris H</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/#comment-43619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-43619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proxy,

I think the problem would be that building styles are influenced by many factors apart from climate.

As an example, our three hundred year old farm house in the South of France is well designed for the current climate. However, this is not the case for new houses that are being built in the same area. Our thick walls, large eaves, small windows and heavy shutters mean that we stay cool in the summer while our friends in new developments swelter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proxy,</p>
<p>I think the problem would be that building styles are influenced by many factors apart from climate.</p>
<p>As an example, our three hundred year old farm house in the South of France is well designed for the current climate. However, this is not the case for new houses that are being built in the same area. Our thick walls, large eaves, small windows and heavy shutters mean that we stay cool in the summer while our friends in new developments swelter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proxy</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/#comment-43618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Proxy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-43618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[re #37 Has anyone looked at using residential buildings as a temperature proxies? The hypothesis being that the design of buildings would have reflected changes in climate throughout the last few thousand years. This would seem to offer substantial accessible data in terms of structural insulation, construction techniques, materials etc etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re #37 Has anyone looked at using residential buildings as a temperature proxies? The hypothesis being that the design of buildings would have reflected changes in climate throughout the last few thousand years. This would seem to offer substantial accessible data in terms of structural insulation, construction techniques, materials etc etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sadlov</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/#comment-43617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Sadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-43617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since RC have been getting back into attack mode again (attacking a broad list of victims, now greatly expanded from only attacking M &amp; M) I thought I unearth this old thread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since RC have been getting back into attack mode again (attacking a broad list of victims, now greatly expanded from only attacking M &amp; M) I thought I unearth this old thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sadlov</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/#comment-43616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Sadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-43616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Post number 44 on the RC thread .... only deafening silence thus far from the usual suspects ...

&quot;Setting aside for a moment any debate regarding proxies such as tree rings and formanifera, from the standpoint of cultural / archeological indicators (as well as historical accounts of things such as life ways, clothing, food and drink and the like) what are the things that tend to confirm and refute a global MWP of substantial degree (that term is somewhat loaded, but by &quot;substantial&quot; I mean things that have impacts similar to things thought to accompany the theorized coming warm up). For example, in Europe, people wore substantially thinner and less layered clothing during the MWP timeframe, versus what they wore during the Rennaissance, Enlightenment, Neo-Classical and Industrial Revolution time frames. That indicates the shift from the warm peak to the cold valley. Cathedrals were thought to be attractants to worship because they gave respite from the heat (even though some of them were not completed in time to reap the most benefit, we must look at the times of their initial conception / early project planning.) Take as another indicator the cultivation of citrus. Etc. What, if any, similar observations and anecdotal evidence are there in the Americas, Africa, Australia and Asia? I have not studied this and welcome what folks have to say in these regards.

&quot;Comment by Steve Sadlov&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post number 44 on the RC thread &#8230;. only deafening silence thus far from the usual suspects &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Setting aside for a moment any debate regarding proxies such as tree rings and formanifera, from the standpoint of cultural / archeological indicators (as well as historical accounts of things such as life ways, clothing, food and drink and the like) what are the things that tend to confirm and refute a global MWP of substantial degree (that term is somewhat loaded, but by &#8220;substantial&#8221; I mean things that have impacts similar to things thought to accompany the theorized coming warm up). For example, in Europe, people wore substantially thinner and less layered clothing during the MWP timeframe, versus what they wore during the Rennaissance, Enlightenment, Neo-Classical and Industrial Revolution time frames. That indicates the shift from the warm peak to the cold valley. Cathedrals were thought to be attractants to worship because they gave respite from the heat (even though some of them were not completed in time to reap the most benefit, we must look at the times of their initial conception / early project planning.) Take as another indicator the cultivation of citrus. Etc. What, if any, similar observations and anecdotal evidence are there in the Americas, Africa, Australia and Asia? I have not studied this and welcome what folks have to say in these regards.</p>
<p>&#8220;Comment by Steve Sadlov&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sadlov</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/#comment-43615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Sadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-43615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: #35. Fascinating. By my reckoning (with substantial reinforcement from a number of archeological dendro studies, one of which is actually linked from Mann&#039;s *own web page!*) swamp cypress and Piedmont hardwoods are to be considered moisture proxies, not temparature proxies. Bristlecones may be either proxies for some complex combination of moisture, fertilization, competition from like and other species, and temperature, or, as I see, possibly moisture alone. Based on results from the Urals and other northern treeline locations, those species may simply be, by nature, a hodge podge of positive and negative responders, perhaps a consquence of plain old genetics. That would seem to leave softwoods in West Coast Maritime climates (particularly in the northern, immediately coastal, less-drought-prone portions of them) and *perhaps* certain hardwoods in humid continental climates as the only reasonable proxies for temperature. And yet, they claim that self same trees do not matter? It is an outrage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: #35. Fascinating. By my reckoning (with substantial reinforcement from a number of archeological dendro studies, one of which is actually linked from Mann&#8217;s *own web page!*) swamp cypress and Piedmont hardwoods are to be considered moisture proxies, not temparature proxies. Bristlecones may be either proxies for some complex combination of moisture, fertilization, competition from like and other species, and temperature, or, as I see, possibly moisture alone. Based on results from the Urals and other northern treeline locations, those species may simply be, by nature, a hodge podge of positive and negative responders, perhaps a consquence of plain old genetics. That would seem to leave softwoods in West Coast Maritime climates (particularly in the northern, immediately coastal, less-drought-prone portions of them) and *perhaps* certain hardwoods in humid continental climates as the only reasonable proxies for temperature. And yet, they claim that self same trees do not matter? It is an outrage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/#comment-43614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve McIntyre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-43614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve S., if you look at the Mann Corrigendum, you&#039;ll notice that a number of Oregon and Washington sites, listed in the Original SI, were not actually used in MBH calculations. This was admitted in the Corrigendum although they claimed that the misrepresentation did not &quot;matter&quot;. As I recall, these sites definitely do not have hockey stick shaped ring width chronologies.

For the Jacoby (northern) sites, the ones that tend to have hockey stick shapes were south facing sites, while sites in valleys or north facing did not have hockey stick shapes. This seems like an odd phenomenon. Of course, Jacoby has not archived all his sites, only the &quot;good&quot; ones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve S., if you look at the Mann Corrigendum, you&#8217;ll notice that a number of Oregon and Washington sites, listed in the Original SI, were not actually used in MBH calculations. This was admitted in the Corrigendum although they claimed that the misrepresentation did not &#8220;matter&#8221;. As I recall, these sites definitely do not have hockey stick shaped ring width chronologies.</p>
<p>For the Jacoby (northern) sites, the ones that tend to have hockey stick shapes were south facing sites, while sites in valleys or north facing did not have hockey stick shapes. This seems like an odd phenomenon. Of course, Jacoby has not archived all his sites, only the &#8220;good&#8221; ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sadlov</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/#comment-43613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Sadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-43613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just posted on one of the other RC threads:

RE: &quot;That said, it&#039;s also clear that glaciations (which have not been present throughout much of history, with ice-free conditions existing as recently as 30M years ago and the current severe glaciations - the Pleistocene - having kicked in just a couple of million years ago) have not been able to exist in the past whenever CO2 has been above a certain level in the atmosphere.&quot;

It was a long time ago. I attended a talk by I believe Arawmick (again, it may have been someone else, but I think it was he) that proposed something a bit different from this. Namely, that the Pleistocene may have started with the closure of the Isthmus of Panama during the previous orogeny. Again, this was long ago and no doubt &quot;discredited&quot; by numerous &quot;climate scientists.&quot; Just thought I&#039;d share my own experience here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just posted on one of the other RC threads:</p>
<p>RE: &#8220;That said, it&#8217;s also clear that glaciations (which have not been present throughout much of history, with ice-free conditions existing as recently as 30M years ago and the current severe glaciations &#8211; the Pleistocene &#8211; having kicked in just a couple of million years ago) have not been able to exist in the past whenever CO2 has been above a certain level in the atmosphere.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was a long time ago. I attended a talk by I believe Arawmick (again, it may have been someone else, but I think it was he) that proposed something a bit different from this. Namely, that the Pleistocene may have started with the closure of the Isthmus of Panama during the previous orogeny. Again, this was long ago and no doubt &#8220;discredited&#8221; by numerous &#8220;climate scientists.&#8221; Just thought I&#8217;d share my own experience here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sadlov</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/11/realclimate-on-ob/#comment-43612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Sadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=526#comment-43612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well my Bristlecone critique did make it through after all. It will be interesting to see if a response gets edited in later. What a can of worms!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well my Bristlecone critique did make it through after all. It will be interesting to see if a response gets edited in later. What a can of worms!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
