Comments on: More on the Yamal Substitution http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/21/more-on-the-yamal-substitution/ by Steve McIntyre Thu, 23 May 2013 23:06:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: John A http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/21/more-on-the-yamal-substitution/#comment-44121 Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:57:39 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=538#comment-44121 When the penny drops, as it did in my case, your jaw hits the floor.

]]> By: Larry Huldén http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/21/more-on-the-yamal-substitution/#comment-44120 Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:15:45 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=538#comment-44120 Who are the most prominent falsifiers of scientific results in history?
M… J…. or B….. ?

Falsify or perish is IN ! (the only option for M… J…. or B…..)

Publish or perish is OUT ? (St e … Mc .. )

I think every one already knows that this comment is not any more needed, but I could not resist !!!

]]> By: Dave Dardinger http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/21/more-on-the-yamal-substitution/#comment-44119 Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:55:10 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=538#comment-44119 It looks to me like the lighter line in the Yamal graph (f) is nearly same as the longer series but moved about 150 years forward.

]]> By: jae http://climateaudit.org/2006/02/21/more-on-the-yamal-substitution/#comment-44118 Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:52:24 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=538#comment-44118 This is simply unbelievable. The team now has apparently now completely embraced the practice of cherry-picking. I can’t see how they can defend it. Have any of them ever responded to this question, other than to say something about controlling variance?

]]>