<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Caramilk Secret &#8230; Finally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maddog</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/#comment-49735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maddog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 04:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=649#comment-49735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too bad you are all wrong. ONE chocolate station.. ONE caramel station. It all has to do with density and a mold that&#039;s cooled on the bottom and heated from the top. Caramel sinks though melted chocolate which solidifies over top.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad you are all wrong. ONE chocolate station.. ONE caramel station. It all has to do with density and a mold that&#8217;s cooled on the bottom and heated from the top. Caramel sinks though melted chocolate which solidifies over top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchel</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/#comment-49734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 06:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=649#comment-49734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good that you finally revealed the secret but i simply dont understand what are your motives behind the post mortem of the undoubtedly delicious Caramilk chocolate.
Anyways let me also know its recipe if you are successful in revealing that too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good that you finally revealed the secret but i simply dont understand what are your motives behind the post mortem of the undoubtedly delicious Caramilk chocolate.<br />
Anyways let me also know its recipe if you are successful in revealing that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/#comment-49733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=649#comment-49733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am the brother of the MRI fiddler, so I can swear to the unnecessary complexity of all things eminating from DEA. (Enzymes!) Moreover, I manage a chocolate factory, and though I am loath to harm any speculations that injure the myths and mysteries of Drug store chocolate... it&#039;s all in the temperatures of the various parts and when they come into contact. FYI: In the manufacture of chocolate products, there is no right side up or upside down. There is marketting burly Santa Claus&#039; which unsold are remelted into cute little bunnies, which unsold become Mother&#039;s Days flowers, which unsold become Fathers&#039; day cigars which unsold become Witches which unsold become Santa Claus. Soft centers cannot be remelted, but the shelf life of foil-wrapped granular sugar, glucose, and invert sugar is measured in nuclear terms - half-lives I think is the term you guys use.
Cheers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the brother of the MRI fiddler, so I can swear to the unnecessary complexity of all things eminating from DEA. (Enzymes!) Moreover, I manage a chocolate factory, and though I am loath to harm any speculations that injure the myths and mysteries of Drug store chocolate&#8230; it&#8217;s all in the temperatures of the various parts and when they come into contact. FYI: In the manufacture of chocolate products, there is no right side up or upside down. There is marketting burly Santa Claus&#8217; which unsold are remelted into cute little bunnies, which unsold become Mother&#8217;s Days flowers, which unsold become Fathers&#8217; day cigars which unsold become Witches which unsold become Santa Claus. Soft centers cannot be remelted, but the shelf life of foil-wrapped granular sugar, glucose, and invert sugar is measured in nuclear terms &#8211; half-lives I think is the term you guys use.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/#comment-49732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=649#comment-49732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Btw, the same sort of thing happens with chocolate covered cherries.  The gooey center is actually crystalized sugar when they are dipped in chocolate.  After a while, the liquid from the cherry causes the sugar to melt.  So kids, when you get a chocolate covered cherry with a hard center, it is actually fresher than one with a gooey center.

Mark]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, the same sort of thing happens with chocolate covered cherries.  The gooey center is actually crystalized sugar when they are dipped in chocolate.  After a while, the liquid from the cherry causes the sugar to melt.  So kids, when you get a chocolate covered cherry with a hard center, it is actually fresher than one with a gooey center.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/#comment-49731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=649#comment-49731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can we get back to determining the confidence limits of the thermal regimes of the two chocolate layers?  I suspect the proxy image has neglected to include the XYZ series (Hersey 1998) and seriously underestimates the MWP (melting/warming period).  Also, I&#039;m rather suspicious of the commercial interest of McIntyre and McKitrick as referenced &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mms.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we get back to determining the confidence limits of the thermal regimes of the two chocolate layers?  I suspect the proxy image has neglected to include the XYZ series (Hersey 1998) and seriously underestimates the MWP (melting/warming period).  Also, I&#8217;m rather suspicious of the commercial interest of McIntyre and McKitrick as referenced <a href="http://www.mms.com/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/#comment-49730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=649#comment-49730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Half right and half wrong. Damn!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Half right and half wrong. Damn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/#comment-49729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=649#comment-49729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[also see:
http://www.mindmagazine.com/story/caramilk.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also see:<br />
<a href="http://www.mindmagazine.com/story/caramilk.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindmagazine.com/story/caramilk.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/#comment-49728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=649#comment-49728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can i suggest as an alternative to using an enzyme (which seems like a long winded way to liquify the center), you could simply add the caramel  into the concave top, and then add the base, which is made a little sticky by warming it slightly so that it adheres.

Then you have the finished product without using enzymes. The secret is that its made upsidedown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can i suggest as an alternative to using an enzyme (which seems like a long winded way to liquify the center), you could simply add the caramel  into the concave top, and then add the base, which is made a little sticky by warming it slightly so that it adheres.</p>
<p>Then you have the finished product without using enzymes. The secret is that its made upsidedown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Hissink</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/#comment-49727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Hissink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=649#comment-49727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[heh heh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug L</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/04/26/the-caramilk-secret-finally/#comment-49726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=649#comment-49726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sleepily assumed the Caramilk secret was an esoteric mystery relating to a little known religious order of Catholic nuns.

 Perhaps they had ancient scrolls written in code that allowed them to blackmail the Vatican or some such thing.

I&#039;m so disappointed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sleepily assumed the Caramilk secret was an esoteric mystery relating to a little known religious order of Catholic nuns.</p>
<p> Perhaps they had ancient scrolls written in code that allowed them to blackmail the Vatican or some such thing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
