Comments on: Reconciling Zorita http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/ by Steve McIntyre Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: TCO http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/#comment-50211 Sun, 21 May 2006 17:18:27 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=657#comment-50211 The 66% comment is interesting. You’ve got 100 decades in a millenia. So a 66% odds on one of those 100 being the premier one is impressive. Now we actually have 20 decades of observed records (about). So if that decade is the warmest of those 20, making a coment that it is the warmest of 200 is a bit less impressive. Perhaps still impressive though. Need some math inserted here. Some little person do that please. I’m more of a strategy guy…

]]> By: Luboš Motl http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/#comment-50210 Sun, 07 May 2006 00:02:33 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=657#comment-50210 Hughes has been heard to say that he believes that the statement about the “warmest decade in 1000 years” was correct with probability 66 percent.

http://julesandjames.blogspot.com/2006/04/hockey-stick-wars-round-xxvii.html#comments

Not much.

]]> By: John A http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/#comment-50209 Sat, 06 May 2006 22:22:01 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=657#comment-50209 Only so long as it’s not abused. I’ll look at it tomorrow.

]]> By: fFreddy http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/#comment-50208 Sat, 06 May 2006 21:56:59 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=657#comment-50208 At the risk of being greedy, any chance of allowing the img tag, so we can do the latex stuff ?
lessthan img src=”/cgi-bin/mimetex.cgi?\mu_i=E[X_i]“/ greaterthan

]]> By: fFreddy http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/#comment-50207 Sat, 06 May 2006 21:52:13 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=657#comment-50207 Excellent. Thanks, John.

]]> By: John A http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/#comment-50206 Sat, 06 May 2006 19:53:05 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=657#comment-50206 Let’s see if this works

Yes.

]]> By: fFreddy http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/#comment-50205 Sat, 06 May 2006 16:15:19 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=657#comment-50205 Re #42, John A
John, does this provide a route to making the sup/sub/etc tags work ?

]]> By: John A http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/#comment-50204 Sat, 06 May 2006 11:29:45 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=657#comment-50204 I’ve edited Jean S’s comment for LaTeX, so hopefully it should be easier to read.

]]> By: TCO http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/#comment-50203 Sat, 06 May 2006 04:04:24 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=657#comment-50203 Agreed. I’m sick of the point.

I’m going to leave the blog (not for this reason…just need to get more work done).

]]> By: Dave Dardinger http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/05/reconciling-zorita/#comment-50202 Sat, 06 May 2006 03:19:26 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=657#comment-50202 You’re getting very boring, TCO. Stop hectoring Steve and go learn something about PCA. Read the links from Jean S in #18 above.

]]>