<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mystery solved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradH</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/#comment-67661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BradH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=876#comment-67661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do believe that CA hits are a temperature proxy!

How about that - and we didn&#039;t have to use a single chainsaw.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe that CA hits are a temperature proxy!</p>
<p>How about that &#8211; and we didn&#8217;t have to use a single chainsaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L Nettles</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/#comment-67660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L Nettles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 03:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=876#comment-67660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;It&#039;s all because of statistics.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL, isn&#039;t what this debate is all about?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s all because of statistics.</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL, isn&#8217;t what this debate is all about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demesure</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/#comment-67659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demesure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=876#comment-67659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fine, my favorite blog is back.
Though your server was down because of excessive (climate) warming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine, my favorite blog is back.<br />
Though your server was down because of excessive (climate) warming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Frank</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/#comment-67658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=876#comment-67658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: #6 -- &quot;You lot have got Hockey Sticks on the brain.&quot;

I&#039;ll say they do. It&#039;s very clear that the hit statistics track the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_temperature_record&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;instrumental temperature record&lt;/a&gt; between about 1900-1950. How did they all miss that?

On the basis of that Mannifestly true analytical model, I predict CA is due for several months of cooling attention, leading to worried predictions of englaciated blogosis, followed by 18 months of accelerating hits and inverted alarms about runaway greenblog effects.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: #6 &#8212; &#8220;You lot have got Hockey Sticks on the brain.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say they do. It&#8217;s very clear that the hit statistics track the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_temperature_record" rel="nofollow">instrumental temperature record</a> between about 1900-1950. How did they all miss that?</p>
<p>On the basis of that Mannifestly true analytical model, I predict CA is due for several months of cooling attention, leading to worried predictions of englaciated blogosis, followed by 18 months of accelerating hits and inverted alarms about runaway greenblog effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/#comment-67657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=876#comment-67657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You lot have got Hockey Sticks on the brain. We on Climate Audit have &quot;moved on&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You lot have got Hockey Sticks on the brain. We on Climate Audit have &#8220;moved on&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indur Goklany</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/#comment-67656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Indur Goklany]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=876#comment-67656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darn, # 3, you beat me to it, according to the clock.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn, # 3, you beat me to it, according to the clock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indur Goklany</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/#comment-67655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Indur Goklany]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=876#comment-67655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Methinks I see a hockey stick in your data.  I hope you don&#039;t bristle at my suggestion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks I see a hockey stick in your data.  I hope you don&#8217;t bristle at my suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/#comment-67654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=876#comment-67654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hmm, that chart looks awfully like a hockey stick...if you extrapolate the stick part back before the blog existed which could easily be done using a linear trend for 2006 only, subtracting 700k hits and splicing... I&#039;m just sayin&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, that chart looks awfully like a hockey stick&#8230;if you extrapolate the stick part back before the blog existed which could easily be done using a linear trend for 2006 only, subtracting 700k hits and splicing&#8230; I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Machnee</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/#comment-67653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerald Machnee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=876#comment-67653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember a similar event at an unnamed place a number of years ago. It caused some panic among the computer operators for some hours!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a similar event at an unnamed place a number of years ago. It caused some panic among the computer operators for some hours!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dardinger</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2006/10/27/mystery-solved-ca-scuppered-by-statistics-again/#comment-67652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Dardinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=876#comment-67652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To preempt Peter H or someone like that, you notice that there&#039;s pronounced decline in the site for some time now.  I estimate that based on present trends there will be no hits at all in less than two years.

The blog is falling, the blog is falling!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To preempt Peter H or someone like that, you notice that there&#8217;s pronounced decline in the site for some time now.  I estimate that based on present trends there will be no hits at all in less than two years.</p>
<p>The blog is falling, the blog is falling!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
