Comments on: IPCC Schedule: WG1 Report Available Only to Insiders Until May 2007 http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/ by Steve McIntyre Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:55:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Heretics in the Church of Environmentalism : Candy Slice of Life http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/#comment-76956 Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:04:52 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1101#comment-76956 [...] Steve McIntyre has figured out that the climate science follows very different rules than science. On 2/2/2007, i.e. next Friday, the summary of the IPCC international climate report for policymakers will be released. However, the full report won’t be released until May 2007. What will the IPCC people do in these three months? Well, the answer can be found on page “4 of 15″ of this [...]

]]> By: Jeff http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/#comment-76955 Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:45:55 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1101#comment-76955 I perhaps was a littly too rosy in talking about that French summit on biodiversity that was going to ramp up an IPCC like group about what’s happening to plant and animal life. A grim story just came out about the French meeting about IMoSEB: http://frogmatters.wordpress.com/2007/11/22/biodiversitys-equivalent-to-ipcc-gets-grim-news-report/

]]> By: Jeff http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/#comment-76954 Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:52:41 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1101#comment-76954 I give IPCC all the credit in the world for at least making fence sitters take notice. Every environmental cause should have such a mechanism for churning out science to overcome and overwhelm the skeptics. I noticed that this past weekend the biodiversity camp is getting closer to its own version of IPCC, only they call it IMoSEB. I’ve summarized the report in my frog blog, and the link to the report is in there, too: http://frogmatters.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/can-this-acronym-do-for-biodiversity-what-ipcc-has-done-for-global-warming/

]]> By: Heretics in the Church of Environmentalism « Hold Your CO2 http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/#comment-76953 Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:01:33 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1101#comment-76953 [...] Steve McIntyre has figured out that the climate science follows very different rules than science. On 2/2/2007, i.e. next Friday, the summary of the IPCC international climate report for policymakers will be released. However, the full report won’t be released until May 2007. What will the IPCC people do in these three months? Well, the answer can be found on page “4 of 15″ of this [...]

]]> By: kchua http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/#comment-76952 Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:00:32 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1101#comment-76952 I am not sure if the link will work. The Vancouver Sun apparently got hold of a report that will
be released on Friday. If it does not work, go to http://www.Canada.com, scroll down and click the
“Environemnt” tab.

Headline reads: 30% of earth’s life forms at risk

href=”http://www.canada.com/topics/technology/science/story.html?id=db486a89-d89c-4aa0-8acb-e2855183c153&k=48241″>

]]> By: bruce http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/#comment-76951 Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:25:42 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1101#comment-76951 Re #53: Puzzled by this post, I clicked on the header/identifier which took me to a very interesting post on the Candy Slice of Life blog which discusses global warming scepticism. The Chris Landsea letter is reproduced in full. What a powerful and articulate exposition of the issues. While that letter did seem to get widespread coverage, it is very interesting to re-read it in the context of the release of the SPM for 4AR.

]]> By: Candy Slice of Life » Article » Heretics in the Church of Environmentalism http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/#comment-76950 Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:02:32 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1101#comment-76950 [...] Steve McIntyre has figured out that the climate science follows very different rules than science. On 2/2/2007, i.e. next Friday, the summary of the IPCC international climate report for policymakers will be released. However, the full report won’t be released until May 2007. What will the IPCC people do in these three months? Well, the answer can be found on page “4 of 15″ of this [...]

]]> By: Luboš Motl http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/#comment-76949 Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:59:35 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1101#comment-76949 Battle of Antarctica

While we have these difficulties with the procedures of IPCC, there are “experts” who criticize IPCC for being too “conservative” because the IPCC won’t predict any catastrophe in Antarctica and it will say that the mass of ice is going to increase and the overall heat is gonna be unchanged.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,2000533,00.html

On the other hand, these “experts” think that catastrophes must be predicted for every point of the Earth including Antarctica. ;-)

Via Benny Peiser

]]> By: Steve Sadlov http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/#comment-76948 Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:52:49 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1101#comment-76948 RE: #50 – Us Reps: Schmidt, Amman, Mann, Pierrehumbert, Curry, etc?

]]> By: Steve P http://climateaudit.org/2007/01/24/ipcc-4ar/#comment-76947 Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:06:30 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1101#comment-76947 Who are these “governments officials” that are colluding to draft the UN policy document that is suppressing publication of the science? “Environment Ministers”, or lower level bureaucrats from national regulatory agencies (only)? Are “governments” economists etc also participating, or is this diktat a global power play by the collective global environmental regulatory bureaucracy?

And perhaps of no small interest to many: how is the USA represented, and by whom?

]]>