<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jones and the Russian UHI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:30:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip_B</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/#comment-79933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip_B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1152#comment-79933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting study of UHI in Singapore. You can literally see Changi Airport and the docks (also large expanse of concrete) in the thermal image.

http://www.bca.gov.sg/ResearchInnovation/others/UHI%20_2004-001_%20rev.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting study of UHI in Singapore. You can literally see Changi Airport and the docks (also large expanse of concrete) in the thermal image.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bca.gov.sg/ResearchInnovation/others/UHI%20_2004-001_%20rev.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.bca.gov.sg/ResearchInnovation/others/UHI%20_2004-001_%20rev.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sadlov</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/#comment-79932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Sadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1152#comment-79932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: #96 - Indeed. Let me pick a region out of the air - the I-80 corridor - aka the following California counties - Solano, Yolo, Sacramento, Placer, and Nevada. Look at what has happened in these counties since the end of WW2. Can anyone in their right mind believe that there has not been a general increase in temperature in these places, owing strictly to the increase in human caused local energy flux combined with amazing and extensive albedo modifications in urban, suburban and rural portions of this corridor? Consider also the amount of conversion of rural land to other types during that same period.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: #96 &#8211; Indeed. Let me pick a region out of the air &#8211; the I-80 corridor &#8211; aka the following California counties &#8211; Solano, Yolo, Sacramento, Placer, and Nevada. Look at what has happened in these counties since the end of WW2. Can anyone in their right mind believe that there has not been a general increase in temperature in these places, owing strictly to the increase in human caused local energy flux combined with amazing and extensive albedo modifications in urban, suburban and rural portions of this corridor? Consider also the amount of conversion of rural land to other types during that same period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Erren</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/#comment-79931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans Erren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1152#comment-79931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[roger you don&#039;t need a website, you can use imageshack
http://imageshack.us/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>roger you don&#8217;t need a website, you can use imageshack<br />
<a href="http://imageshack.us/" rel="nofollow">http://imageshack.us/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger dueck</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/#comment-79930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roger dueck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 22:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1152#comment-79930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve M - You fellows are much more adept at handling large volume of GISS data than I, but I have taken a look at a few UHI phenomenon in several areas:
San Antonio TX
Oklahoma City OK
Edmonton AB
These cities all have a number of &quot;rural&quot; stations at various point surrounding. They all show significant and consistently increasing UHI effect. I don&#039;t think there is any doubt that the UHI effect is real and significant, as my observation is that the increase is 0.75C per century for San Antone and 1.1C per century for OK City.
In the case of Edmonton, I compared the Municiple Airpot, near city centre, to the International Airport, some 30 km to the south and adjacent to Leduc and Nisku, two areas with recent rapid oilfield industrial growth. The startling thing is that you can track Edmonton population growth by the increasing temp differential until the mid-70&#039;s when the industrial complex adjacent to the Int Airport went through a growth spurt, along with the Leduc population. I guess we could use the differential as a population proxy!
I think any attempt to &quot;correct&quot; this data for UHI is frivolous and misleading, as the differences are greater the the apparent global warming of the past century.
I don&#039;t have a website to post the graphs but could forward to you to post.

Regards
RD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve M &#8211; You fellows are much more adept at handling large volume of GISS data than I, but I have taken a look at a few UHI phenomenon in several areas:<br />
San Antonio TX<br />
Oklahoma City OK<br />
Edmonton AB<br />
These cities all have a number of &#8220;rural&#8221; stations at various point surrounding. They all show significant and consistently increasing UHI effect. I don&#8217;t think there is any doubt that the UHI effect is real and significant, as my observation is that the increase is 0.75C per century for San Antone and 1.1C per century for OK City.<br />
In the case of Edmonton, I compared the Municiple Airpot, near city centre, to the International Airport, some 30 km to the south and adjacent to Leduc and Nisku, two areas with recent rapid oilfield industrial growth. The startling thing is that you can track Edmonton population growth by the increasing temp differential until the mid-70&#8242;s when the industrial complex adjacent to the Int Airport went through a growth spurt, along with the Leduc population. I guess we could use the differential as a population proxy!<br />
I think any attempt to &#8220;correct&#8221; this data for UHI is frivolous and misleading, as the differences are greater the the apparent global warming of the past century.<br />
I don&#8217;t have a website to post the graphs but could forward to you to post.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
RD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/#comment-79929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve McIntyre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 17:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1152#comment-79929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve excerpted Russian station data from the most recent GHCN listing for Warwick Hughes who is making progress at possible identifications of the Jones stations. See his website. For reference, here&#039;s the script for reading and excerpting the stations:

&lt;blockquote&gt;url&lt; -&quot;ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/inventories/STNLIST-SORTED.TXT&quot;
	fred&lt;-readLines(url,n=25)
#[13] &quot;NUMBER CALL   NAME + COUNTRY/STATE   LAT   LON    ELEV  &quot;
#[14] &quot;&quot;
#[17] &quot;990061 DB061  ENVIRONM BUOY 52079 ** +0000 +14700 +0000&quot;
#[18] &quot;134900        RESERVED FOR NAVY   ** -9999 -99999 -9999&quot;
#[19] &quot;993194        SHIP BLOCK 19       ** -9999 -99999 -9999&quot;
#[20] &quot;691810 KQLH   TUZLA               ** +4453 +01871      &quot;
	test&lt;-read.fwf(url,widths=c(6,1,6,1,20,2,6,7,6),fill=TRUE,skip=14 )
	test&lt;-test[,c(5,1,7,8,9)]
	test$start0&lt;-NA
	test$end0&lt;-NA
	test[,3:4]&lt;-test[,3:4]/100
	test$jones&lt;-jones(test[,3],test[,4])
	names(test)&lt;-names(russia[[1]])
	levels(test$site)&lt;-sub(&#039; +$&#039;, &#039;&#039;, levels(test$site))  ## spaces only
	capwords &lt;- function(s, strict = FALSE) {
   	 cap &lt;- function(s) paste(toupper(substring(s,1,1)),
                  {s &lt;- substring(s,2); if(strict) tolower(s) else s},
                             sep = &quot;&quot;, collapse = &quot; &quot; )
	   sapply(strsplit(s, split = &quot; &quot;), cap, USE.NAMES = !is.null(names(s)))
	}
        levels(test$site)&lt;-capwords(casefold(levels(test$site))) #for readability but optional

	temp42)&amp;(test$long&lt;85)&amp;(test$long&gt;25)&amp;!is.na(test$lat)&amp;!is.na(test$long)
	sum(temp) #46
	test&lt; -test[temp,]
	test&lt;-test[order(test$jones),]
	write.table(test,file=&quot;d:/climate/data/jones/stations/ghcn.russia.txt&quot;,sep=&quot;\t&quot;,row.names=FALSE)
 &lt;/blockquote&gt;

This extracts 1764 stations extending a list of 1359 stations from which Warwick has matched many plausible candidates.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve excerpted Russian station data from the most recent GHCN listing for Warwick Hughes who is making progress at possible identifications of the Jones stations. See his website. For reference, here&#8217;s the script for reading and excerpting the stations:</p>
<blockquote><p>url&lt; -&quot;<a href="ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/inventories/STNLIST-SORTED.TXT&#038;quot" rel="nofollow">ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/inventories/STNLIST-SORTED.TXT&#038;quot</a>;<br />
	fred&lt;-readLines(url,n=25)<br />
#[13] &quot;NUMBER CALL   NAME + COUNTRY/STATE   LAT   LON    ELEV  &quot;<br />
#[14] &quot;&quot;<br />
#[17] &quot;990061 DB061  ENVIRONM BUOY 52079 ** +0000 +14700 +0000&quot;<br />
#[18] &quot;134900        RESERVED FOR NAVY   ** -9999 -99999 -9999&quot;<br />
#[19] &quot;993194        SHIP BLOCK 19       ** -9999 -99999 -9999&quot;<br />
#[20] &quot;691810 KQLH   TUZLA               ** +4453 +01871      &quot;<br />
	test&lt;-read.fwf(url,widths=c(6,1,6,1,20,2,6,7,6),fill=TRUE,skip=14 )<br />
	test&lt;-test[,c(5,1,7,8,9)]<br />
	test$start0&lt;-NA<br />
	test$end0&lt;-NA<br />
	test[,3:4]&lt;-test[,3:4]/100<br />
	test$jones&lt;-jones(test[,3],test[,4])<br />
	names(test)&lt;-names(russia[[1]])<br />
	levels(test$site)&lt;-sub(&#039; +$&#039;, &#039;&#039;, levels(test$site))  ## spaces only<br />
	capwords &lt;- function(s, strict = FALSE) {<br />
   	 cap &lt;- function(s) paste(toupper(substring(s,1,1)),<br />
                  {s &lt;- substring(s,2); if(strict) tolower(s) else s},<br />
                             sep = &quot;&quot;, collapse = &quot; &quot; )<br />
	   sapply(strsplit(s, split = &quot; &quot;), cap, USE.NAMES = !is.null(names(s)))<br />
	}<br />
        levels(test$site)&lt;-capwords(casefold(levels(test$site))) #for readability but optional</p>
<p>	temp42)&amp;(test$long&lt;85)&amp;(test$long&gt;25)&amp;!is.na(test$lat)&amp;!is.na(test$long)<br />
	sum(temp) #46<br />
	test&lt; -test[temp,]<br />
	test&lt;-test[order(test$jones),]<br />
	write.table(test,file=&quot;d:/climate/data/jones/stations/ghcn.russia.txt&quot;,sep=&quot;\t&quot;,row.names=FALSE)
 </p></blockquote>
<p>This extracts 1764 stations extending a list of 1359 stations from which Warwick has matched many plausible candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Errors in IPCC climate science &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Does anybody have a very detailed list of Russian met station locations ?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/#comment-79928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Errors in IPCC climate science &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Does anybody have a very detailed list of Russian met station locations ?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 08:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1152#comment-79928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ClimateAudit, Steve McIntyre has a Feb 19 2007 post &#8221; Jones and the Russian UHI&#8221;, tackling the issue of replicating what was done in the highly influential Jones et al 1990 Letter [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ClimateAudit, Steve McIntyre has a Feb 19 2007 post &#8221; Jones and the Russian UHI&#8221;, tackling the issue of replicating what was done in the highly influential Jones et al 1990 Letter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Morbey</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/#comment-79927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Morbey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1152#comment-79927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[;-)

&quot;...The total temperature increase from 1850 - 1899 to 2001 - 2005 is 0.76 [0.57 to 0.95]°C. Urban heat island effects are real but local, and have a negligible influence (less than 0.006°C per decade over land and zero over the oceans) on these values.&quot;

There you have it! Half the world&#039;s population of urban-dwellers (and their engines) provide negligible influence on global warming.

Therefore, farmers and hermits are the culprits?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;The total temperature increase from 1850 &#8211; 1899 to 2001 &#8211; 2005 is 0.76 [0.57 to 0.95]°C. Urban heat island effects are real but local, and have a negligible influence (less than 0.006°C per decade over land and zero over the oceans) on these values.&#8221;</p>
<p>There you have it! Half the world&#8217;s population of urban-dwellers (and their engines) provide negligible influence on global warming.</p>
<p>Therefore, farmers and hermits are the culprits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave B</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/#comment-79926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1152#comment-79926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[91...or more in my neck of the woods, plattsburgh, NY air force base (closed) in the adirondacks.  or niagara falls, NY air force base, (not closed due to political wrangling, but not being used as much as its acreage would support).  lots of blacktop, very low population, still a likely high UHI.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>91&#8230;or more in my neck of the woods, plattsburgh, NY air force base (closed) in the adirondacks.  or niagara falls, NY air force base, (not closed due to political wrangling, but not being used as much as its acreage would support).  lots of blacktop, very low population, still a likely high UHI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sadlov</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/#comment-79925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Sadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1152#comment-79925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: #90 - I wonder what the impact is of, for example, the Mojave Airport (and other large aircraft mothball areas)? What is the impact of turning massive areas of desert caliche into well cultivated and well watered top soil with crops growing in it a goodly percentage of each year? Etc, etc, etc ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: #90 &#8211; I wonder what the impact is of, for example, the Mojave Airport (and other large aircraft mothball areas)? What is the impact of turning massive areas of desert caliche into well cultivated and well watered top soil with crops growing in it a goodly percentage of each year? Etc, etc, etc &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave B</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/02/19/jones-russian-uhi-study/#comment-79924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1152#comment-79924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#86, 88...

my thought is that PEOPLE are not the primary cause of UHI.  STRUCTURE, ie blacktop, buildings, perhaps electronic infrastructure are what cause UHI.  in the absense of significant human population, my local weather station at the airport will register a higher temperature, secondary to the many acres of blacktop and concrete in the immediate area.  population may end up being a matter of only secondary importance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#86, 88&#8230;</p>
<p>my thought is that PEOPLE are not the primary cause of UHI.  STRUCTURE, ie blacktop, buildings, perhaps electronic infrastructure are what cause UHI.  in the absense of significant human population, my local weather station at the airport will register a higher temperature, secondary to the many acres of blacktop and concrete in the immediate area.  population may end up being a matter of only secondary importance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
