Comments on: The Team and Pearl Harbor

By: Multidecadal Variations and Sea Surface Temperature Reconstructions | Watts Up With That?

Tue, 14 May 2013 11:42:37 +0000

[…] The Team and Pearl Harbor […]

By: Multidecadal Variations and Sea Surface Temperature Reconstructions | Bob Tisdale – Climate Observations

Tue, 14 May 2013 11:24:02 +0000

[…] The Team and Pearl Harbor […]

By: Climatemonitor

Climatemonitor — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:01:10 +0000

[...] compensazione dell’errore sistematico elaborato da Folland et al. non è esente da critiche. S.McIntyre, in particolare, ne esprime alcune che, personalmente, mi sento di [...]

By: HadSST3 « Climate Audit

HadSST3 « Climate Audit — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 04:39:53 +0000

[...] been originally criticized at CA in 2005 here and further discussed at length in March 2007 at CA here, a post in which I observed that no climate scientist had made any attempt to validate [...]

By: Nature "Discovers" Another Climate Audit Finding « Climate Audit

Nature "Discovers" Another Climate Audit Finding « Climate Audit — Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:43:51 +0000

[...] showed the prevalence of buckets as late as 1970 (discussed here), I showed in a post entitled The Team and Pearl Harbour that this directly contradicted the Team’s Pearl Harbor adjustment and even showed the impact [...]

By: More Misrepresentations from RealClimate « Climate Audit

More Misrepresentations from RealClimate « Climate Audit — Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:00:27 +0000

[...] next day, I re-examined the Pearl Harbour hypothesis, carrying out a calculation on the basis of Carl Smith’s [...]

By: Rasmus, the Chevalier and Bucket Adjustments « Climate Audit

Rasmus, the Chevalier and Bucket Adjustments « Climate Audit — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:53:46 +0000

[...] several past posts here here here , I’ve observed that there is a very substantial and speculative adjustment of SSTs for [...]

By: Claire Makeup

Claire Makeup — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:15:37 +0000

Awesome post! Seriously you give some top quality high content which is awesome. Thanks for sharing with us and keep it up!

By: Steve McIntyre

Steve McIntyre — Fri, 30 May 2008 02:57:54 +0000

#83. Fair enough. I’ve spent some time with the different solar versions. It would be worth re-doing this graphic with a new version to see what it looks like.

By: Leif

Leif — Fri, 30 May 2008 01:41:06 +0000

55 (SteveMc): You used Lean 1995 for TSI. Not even Lean thinks anymore that that reconstruction is valid. Steve, please try not to perpetuate the old TSI reconstructions which we know today are not valid. On my website is a compilation of modern TSI-reconstructions. Use column C (me, the best, of course ), D (Dora Preminger, also good), or K (Krivova et al., if you must). The latter still has a unsubstantiated, small background change during 1900-1950.