<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whitewashing the Temperature Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John F. Pittman</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/#comment-87966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John F. Pittman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 21:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1546#comment-87966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just contacted NASA by email. I am trying to get their complete guidelines (if existant) for meeting the OMB&#039;s DQA.
&lt;blockquote&gt;TO: NASA Chief Information Officer (CIO)
Patricia L. Dunnington, or designee

Pursuent to NPR 2201.1, the NASA Procedural Requirements NPR 2200.2B, and OMB, Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies, Final Guidelines (corrected), 67 Fed. Reg. 8452 (Feb. 22. 2002),  how would I report a STI derived from NASA activities 1.2.2, per 1.2.1 of Section 1.2, that is in factual error for Quality and Objectivity? The OMB mandates administrative mechanisms allowing affected persons to seek and obtain correction of information maintained and disseminated by an agency. I would like to review your mechanisms (procedures) for this. Could you please direct me to where it is located in the NODIS library? Thank you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just contacted NASA by email. I am trying to get their complete guidelines (if existant) for meeting the OMB&#8217;s DQA.</p>
<blockquote><p>TO: NASA Chief Information Officer (CIO)<br />
Patricia L. Dunnington, or designee</p>
<p>Pursuent to NPR 2201.1, the NASA Procedural Requirements NPR 2200.2B, and OMB, Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies, Final Guidelines (corrected), 67 Fed. Reg. 8452 (Feb. 22. 2002),  how would I report a STI derived from NASA activities 1.2.2, per 1.2.1 of Section 1.2, that is in factual error for Quality and Objectivity? The OMB mandates administrative mechanisms allowing affected persons to seek and obtain correction of information maintained and disseminated by an agency. I would like to review your mechanisms (procedures) for this. Could you please direct me to where it is located in the NODIS library? Thank you.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernie</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/#comment-87965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bernie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1546#comment-87965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On second thoughts, Leslie Stahl carrying a portable reader will not work.  She or any human would probably give off too much heat..  Best a series of boxes at regular intervals showing a trend as you move away from the hot spot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On second thoughts, Leslie Stahl carrying a portable reader will not work.  She or any human would probably give off too much heat..  Best a series of boxes at regular intervals showing a trend as you move away from the hot spot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/#comment-87964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve McIntyre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 20:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1546#comment-87964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good idea, John. Make it NASA&#039;s problem.  Why don&#039;t you post up a template and maybe Anthony or someone else will pursue?  I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing a template as well, since other cases are going to crop up/have already cropped up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea, John. Make it NASA&#8217;s problem.  Why don&#8217;t you post up a template and maybe Anthony or someone else will pursue?  I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing a template as well, since other cases are going to crop up/have already cropped up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John F. Pittman</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/#comment-87963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John F. Pittman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 20:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1546#comment-87963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watt&#039;s up asks &quot;How does bad data like this slip into the NASA GISS model?&quot;

Steve per DQA, NASA had some of the best written guidelines. Perhaps someone such as Anthony Watts should fill out a data quality complaint for this data site under the ACT. I would be glad to help. In fact, the details of meeting NASA&#039;s guidelines should be a template where the changing data could be entered easily for each site.

From Wiki., the text of the DQA law

The guidelines under subsection (a) shall &#039;€&quot;

(1) apply to the sharing by Federal agencies of, and access to, information disseminated by Federal agencies; and
(2) require that each Federal agency to which the guidelines apply &#039;€&quot;
(A) issue guidelines ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility and integrity of information (including statistical information) disseminated by the agency, by not later than 1 year after the date of issuance of the guidelines under subsection (a);
(B) establish administrative mechanisms allowing affected persons to seek and obtain correction of information maintained and disseminated by the agency that does not comply with the guidelines issued under subsection (a); and
(C) report periodically to the Director &#039;€&quot;
(i) the number and nature of complaints received by the agency regarding the accuracy of information disseminated by the agency; and
(ii) how such complaints were handled by the agency.

OMB, Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies, Final Guidelines (corrected), 67 Fed. Reg. 8452 (Feb. 22. 2002)

Perhaps this would interest 60 Minutes even more if NASA refuses to address such an obvious data problem. A federal agency refusing to obey federal law. Think of all the other potential faces in such a show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watt&#8217;s up asks &#8220;How does bad data like this slip into the NASA GISS model?&#8221;</p>
<p>Steve per DQA, NASA had some of the best written guidelines. Perhaps someone such as Anthony Watts should fill out a data quality complaint for this data site under the ACT. I would be glad to help. In fact, the details of meeting NASA&#8217;s guidelines should be a template where the changing data could be entered easily for each site.</p>
<p>From Wiki., the text of the DQA law</p>
<p>The guidelines under subsection (a) shall &#8216;€&#8221;</p>
<p>(1) apply to the sharing by Federal agencies of, and access to, information disseminated by Federal agencies; and<br />
(2) require that each Federal agency to which the guidelines apply &#8216;€&#8221;<br />
(A) issue guidelines ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility and integrity of information (including statistical information) disseminated by the agency, by not later than 1 year after the date of issuance of the guidelines under subsection (a);<br />
(B) establish administrative mechanisms allowing affected persons to seek and obtain correction of information maintained and disseminated by the agency that does not comply with the guidelines issued under subsection (a); and<br />
(C) report periodically to the Director &#8216;€&#8221;<br />
(i) the number and nature of complaints received by the agency regarding the accuracy of information disseminated by the agency; and<br />
(ii) how such complaints were handled by the agency.</p>
<p>OMB, Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies, Final Guidelines (corrected), 67 Fed. Reg. 8452 (Feb. 22. 2002)</p>
<p>Perhaps this would interest 60 Minutes even more if NASA refuses to address such an obvious data problem. A federal agency refusing to obey federal law. Think of all the other potential faces in such a show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernie</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/#comment-87962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bernie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 19:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1546#comment-87962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has 60 Minutes written all over it!  Think of the video.  Think of the effect of Leslie Stahl walking away from the current box with a portable highly calibrated temperature gauge at the ready and reading off the dropping temperature as she walks to an open grass covered area!  I hope Anthony Watts is photogenic.  The visibility could do a lot to shake loose the missing station location data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has 60 Minutes written all over it!  Think of the video.  Think of the effect of Leslie Stahl walking away from the current box with a portable highly calibrated temperature gauge at the ready and reading off the dropping temperature as she walks to an open grass covered area!  I hope Anthony Watts is photogenic.  The visibility could do a lot to shake loose the missing station location data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/#comment-87961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve McIntyre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 18:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1546#comment-87961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#98, 99. That&#039;s sickening.  Compare that to Jones and Hansen&#039;s claims that they&#039;ve allowed  for everything. I&#039;m going to do up a post to draw attention to this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#98, 99. That&#8217;s sickening.  Compare that to Jones and Hansen&#8217;s claims that they&#8217;ve allowed  for everything. I&#8217;m going to do up a post to draw attention to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernie</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/#comment-87960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bernie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 18:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1546#comment-87960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russ:
Great site, great story, great pictures, a great comparison site (matched roughly for mean temperature) and a
$64K question at the end.  I will look forward to the full compilation of Anthony&#039;s field visits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ:<br />
Great site, great story, great pictures, a great comparison site (matched roughly for mean temperature) and a<br />
$64K question at the end.  I will look forward to the full compilation of Anthony&#8217;s field visits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/#comment-87959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 18:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1546#comment-87959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Omigosh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omigosh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/#comment-87958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 18:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1546#comment-87958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthony Watts has a great post on the worst USHCN site he has found so far at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Watt&#039;s Up With That&lt;/a&gt;.  You will not believe how bad, untill you see the cell tower airconditioner is blowing on the temperature sensor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony Watts has a great post on the worst USHCN site he has found so far at <a href="http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/" rel="nofollow">Watt&#8217;s Up With That</a>.  You will not believe how bad, untill you see the cell tower airconditioner is blowing on the temperature sensor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EW</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/05/09/whitewashing-the-temperature-record/#comment-87957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 21:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1546#comment-87957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#79
re max-min mercury thermometers - didn&#039;t you have the ones with U-formed capillary? Then the max temp iron bar was in the right arm and the min one in the left arm.
We still have one of those from 60&#039;s in our 24 C incubation thermostatic chamber to check if the air-conditioning works properly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#79<br />
re max-min mercury thermometers &#8211; didn&#8217;t you have the ones with U-formed capillary? Then the max temp iron bar was in the right arm and the min one in the left arm.<br />
We still have one of those from 60&#8242;s in our 24 C incubation thermostatic chamber to check if the air-conditioning works properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
