<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPCC and the Briffa Deletions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briffa about divergence: there is no reconstruction after 1960 &#171; De staat van het klimaat</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/#comment-311337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Briffa about divergence: there is no reconstruction after 1960 &#171; De staat van het klimaat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 07:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1792#comment-311337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] regular readers of Climate Audit know, McIntyre had as a reviewer of AR4 asked the lead authors to deal with the divergence problem: Show the Briffa et al reconstruction through to its end; don’t stop in 1960. Then comment and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] regular readers of Climate Audit know, McIntyre had as a reviewer of AR4 asked the lead authors to deal with the divergence problem: Show the Briffa et al reconstruction through to its end; don’t stop in 1960. Then comment and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peer-to-Peer Review: Hvordan ”Climategate” markerer begyndelsen til en ny videnskabelig bevægelse, 2. del &#171; Klimagate (ClimateGate)</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/#comment-220350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peer-to-Peer Review: Hvordan ”Climategate” markerer begyndelsen til en ny videnskabelig bevægelse, 2. del &#171; Klimagate (ClimateGate)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1792#comment-220350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] syntes at blive understøttet af data, som har mikset æbler med appelsiner. Selv i grafer, hvor de faktiske temperaturer ikke var tilføjet, synes divergensen at være kunstfærdigt skjult, som det ses i en [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] syntes at blive understøttet af data, som har mikset æbler med appelsiner. Selv i grafer, hvor de faktiske temperaturer ikke var tilføjet, synes divergensen at være kunstfærdigt skjult, som det ses i en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Trick &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/#comment-218571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Trick &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1792#comment-218571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] discussion of these issues is at Climate Audit here here here and more recently by Jean S here. Jean S and UC report at CA that the puzzling end point properties [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussion of these issues is at Climate Audit here here here and more recently by Jean S here. Jean S and UC report at CA that the puzzling end point properties [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did IPCC Review Editor Mitchell Do His Job? &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/#comment-218409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Did IPCC Review Editor Mitchell Do His Job? &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1792#comment-218409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] other things, the deletion of post-1960 Briffa reconstruction results &#8211; see for example here here here, where the lead author (Briffa) justified the deletion of adverse post-1960 results from his [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other things, the deletion of post-1960 Briffa reconstruction results &#8211; see for example here here here, where the lead author (Briffa) justified the deletion of adverse post-1960 results from his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NRC: Mann en Jones worden beschimpt, gehoond en verdacht gemaakt &#187; Climategate: feiten en duiding in het klimaatdebat</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/#comment-217973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NRC: Mann en Jones worden beschimpt, gehoond en verdacht gemaakt &#187; Climategate: feiten en duiding in het klimaatdebat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1792#comment-217973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] het misleidend was om zijn reconstructie af te breken in 1960 om zo de divergentie te verhullen. Show it and deal with it, aldus McIntyre. De reactie van het IPCC (wrs. Briffa) was: Rejected — though note divergence’ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] het misleidend was om zijn reconstructie af te breken in 1960 om zo de divergentie te verhullen. Show it and deal with it, aldus McIntyre. De reactie van het IPCC (wrs. Briffa) was: Rejected — though note divergence’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Peer-to-Peer Review (Part II): How &#8216;Climategate&#8217; Marks the Maturing of a New Science Movement - Big Journalism</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/#comment-215092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Peer-to-Peer Review (Part II): How &#8216;Climategate&#8217; Marks the Maturing of a New Science Movement - Big Journalism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 04:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1792#comment-215092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] graphs appeared to be underpinned by data that mixed apples with oranges. Even in graphs where the actual temperatures were not added, the divergence appears to be artfully hidden as seen in a hockey stick graph [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] graphs appeared to be underpinned by data that mixed apples with oranges. Even in graphs where the actual temperatures were not added, the divergence appears to be artfully hidden as seen in a hockey stick graph [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Yale Forum on Climate Change &#38; The Media &#187; The CRU E-mails: What is Really There?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/#comment-210248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Yale Forum on Climate Change &#38; The Media &#187; The CRU E-mails: What is Really There?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1792#comment-210248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] any divergent data, though other subsequent publications (including the IPCC assessment reports [http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/]) have described the reason for doing so and Briffa&#8217;s original paper on the subject [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any divergent data, though other subsequent publications (including the IPCC assessment reports [http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/]) have described the reason for doing so and Briffa&#8217;s original paper on the subject [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media &#187; Climategate: McIntyre and the &#8216;Divergence Problem&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/#comment-209365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pajamas Media &#187; Climategate: McIntyre and the &#8216;Divergence Problem&#8217;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1792#comment-209365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] line &#8220;gets lost&#8221; around 1960 and never reappears. McIntyre noticed this in 2005, and raised the issue in a comment on a later IPCC report. His comment was rejected. Page 1 of 2 &#160;Next [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] line &#8220;gets lost&#8221; around 1960 and never reappears. McIntyre noticed this in 2005, and raised the issue in a comment on a later IPCC report. His comment was rejected. Page 1 of 2 &nbsp;Next [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Change In Climate, Part 1 &#171; ORBIS</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/#comment-208758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Change In Climate, Part 1 &#171; ORBIS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1792#comment-208758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 26 Jun 2007: IPCC and the Briffa Deletions [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 26 Jun 2007: IPCC and the Briffa Deletions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPCC and the “Trick” &#8211; Climate Audit &#171; climategate.tv</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/06/26/ipcc-and-the-briffa-deletions/#comment-208147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IPCC and the “Trick” &#8211; Climate Audit &#171; climategate.tv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1792#comment-208147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Order Draft, I asked the IPCC in the strongest possible terms to show the decline reported at CA here: Show the Briffa et al reconstruction through to its end; don’t stop in 1960. Then comment and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Order Draft, I asked the IPCC in the strongest possible terms to show the decline reported at CA here: Show the Briffa et al reconstruction through to its end; don’t stop in 1960. Then comment and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
