<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hansen&#8217;s Y2K Error</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NASA: &#8220;Hide this after Jim checks it&#8221; &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/#comment-307718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NASA: &#8220;Hide this after Jim checks it&#8221; &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1854#comment-307718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Y2K controversy in August 2007. On August 3 (10:46 am Eastern), I had published a post entitled Hansen&#8217;s Y2K Error  in which I observed a previously unreported &#8220;Y2K error&#8221; in GISS USHCN conclusively [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Y2K controversy in August 2007. On August 3 (10:46 am Eastern), I had published a post entitled Hansen&#8217;s Y2K Error  in which I observed a previously unreported &#8220;Y2K error&#8221; in GISS USHCN conclusively [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Hot news: NASA quietly fixes flawed temperature data; 1998 was NOT the warmest year in the millenium</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/#comment-302144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle Malkin &#187; Hot news: NASA quietly fixes flawed temperature data; 1998 was NOT the warmest year in the millenium]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 02:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1854#comment-302144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Here is one of his first posts where he begins to understand what is happening. &#8220;This imparts an upward discontinuity of a deg C in wintertime and 0.8 deg C annually. I checked the monthly data and determined that the discontinuity occurred on January 2000 &#8211; and, to that extent, appears to be a Y2K problem. I presume that this is a programming error.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is one of his first posts where he begins to understand what is happening. &#8220;This imparts an upward discontinuity of a deg C in wintertime and 0.8 deg C annually. I checked the monthly data and determined that the discontinuity occurred on January 2000 &#8211; and, to that extent, appears to be a Y2K problem. I presume that this is a programming error.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quantifying the Hansen Y2K Error &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/#comment-252458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quantifying the Hansen Y2K Error &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1854#comment-252458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] observed recently that Hansen&#8217;s GISS series contains an apparent error in which Hansen switched the source of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] observed recently that Hansen&#8217;s GISS series contains an apparent error in which Hansen switched the source of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nasa e-mails zijn niet privé &#187; Climategate: feiten en duiding in het klimaatdebat</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/#comment-216047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nasa e-mails zijn niet privé &#187; Climategate: feiten en duiding in het klimaatdebat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1854#comment-216047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] had ik het gisteren over dit incident als voorbeeld van undernews dat news wordt. McIntyre bracht dit nieuws voor het eerst op 3 augustus 2007 en de e-mails in het vrijgegeven document beginnen ook op die [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had ik het gisteren over dit incident als voorbeeld van undernews dat news wordt. McIntyre bracht dit nieuws voor het eerst op 3 augustus 2007 en de e-mails in het vrijgegeven document beginnen ook op die [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peer review is dood, leve peer-to-peer review &#187; Climategate: feiten en duiding in het klimaatdebat</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/#comment-215812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peer review is dood, leve peer-to-peer review &#187; Climategate: feiten en duiding in het klimaatdebat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1854#comment-215812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] bijvoorbeeld een blog. Undernews kan later nieuws worden. Een mooi voorbeeld is McIntyre&#8217;s ontdekking in 2007 dat er een soort millenniumbug zat in Nasa&#8217;s Amerikaanse temperatuurreeks, waardoor [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bijvoorbeeld een blog. Undernews kan later nieuws worden. Een mooi voorbeeld is McIntyre&#8217;s ontdekking in 2007 dat er een soort millenniumbug zat in Nasa&#8217;s Amerikaanse temperatuurreeks, waardoor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giochiamo con i numeri &#124; Climate Monitor</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/#comment-97778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giochiamo con i numeri &#124; Climate Monitor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1854#comment-97778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (riscaldamento globale di origine antropica), tale Steve Mc Intyre ha discusso sul suo blog alcuni apparentemente inspiegabili &#8220;errori&#8221; del nuovo software di trattamento [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (riscaldamento globale di origine antropica), tale Steve Mc Intyre ha discusso sul suo blog alcuni apparentemente inspiegabili &#8220;errori&#8221; del nuovo software di trattamento [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoystory &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oh, the irony</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/#comment-97777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoystory &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oh, the irony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1854#comment-97777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Statisician Steve McIntyre, the guy who famously exposed the global warming hockey stick fraud, has done the world another service by pointing out an error in NASA climate expert James Hansen&#8217;s temperature adjustment algorithms that had the effect of causing a false jump in official temperatures. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Statisician Steve McIntyre, the guy who famously exposed the global warming hockey stick fraud, has done the world another service by pointing out an error in NASA climate expert James Hansen&#8217;s temperature adjustment algorithms that had the effect of causing a false jump in official temperatures. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Models, Methods, Software &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verify the Calculation: An Example</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/#comment-97776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Models, Methods, Software &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verify the Calculation: An Example]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1854#comment-97776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] example started with this, which lead to this, and leading finally to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] example started with this, which lead to this, and leading finally to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdn</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/#comment-97775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gdn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1854#comment-97775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to be clear, is the above &quot;Vincent Gray&quot; THE Vincent Gray, A Vincent Gray, or just someone who thinks it&#039;s a neat name?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear, is the above &#8220;Vincent Gray&#8221; THE Vincent Gray, A Vincent Gray, or just someone who thinks it&#8217;s a neat name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Gray</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/03/hansens-y2k-whopper/#comment-97774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent Gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1854#comment-97774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there is all this doubt about the US sites what about the rest of the world? Why should you believe the &quot;global mean temeprature anomaly?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is all this doubt about the US sites what about the rest of the world? Why should you believe the &#8220;global mean temeprature anomaly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
