<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Leaderboard at the U.S. Open</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Hansen&#8217;s Error &#8220;Matter&#8221;? &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/#comment-252461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Does Hansen&#8217;s Error &#8220;Matter&#8221;? &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1880#comment-252461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] changes in the U.S. history were not brought to the attention of readers by GISS itself, but in this post at climateaudit. As a result of the GISS revisions, there was a change in the &#8220;leader [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] changes in the U.S. history were not brought to the attention of readers by GISS itself, but in this post at climateaudit. As a result of the GISS revisions, there was a change in the &#8220;leader [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Accurate are Global Temperatures? - Page 5 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/#comment-242544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Accurate are Global Temperatures? - Page 5 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1880#comment-242544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 8 2007  So why did you post that wrong link with the 2007 table???? Where is the correct link???  A New Leaderboard at the U.S. Open Climate Audit comment 31  I suggest that you read the article as well.   __________________ if you stop blaming [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8 2007  So why did you post that wrong link with the 2007 table???? Where is the correct link???  A New Leaderboard at the U.S. Open Climate Audit comment 31  I suggest that you read the article as well.   __________________ if you stop blaming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Nusbaum</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/#comment-238944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Nusbaum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1880#comment-238944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All these temperature measurements are sort of red herrings, if for no other reason than that they are subject to human errors.  Look for changes in ecologies that indicate warming (or cooling - but there are none of those) temperatures.  Migration patterns of flora and fauna. (Flora move up mountains until they get to the top and die, or they move north)  Changes in time of migration.  Changes in sex ratios of some amphibians.  Continuously shrinking ice sheets and glaciers.  Earlier melt times and later freeze times of large bodies of water and rivers.  Average these over decades.   

And before some ignoramus points  to more ice and snow in the antarctic, let me say that that is evidence of global warming, not cooling.  This is also true of glaciers that grow in areas that, despite general warming,  still seldom get above freezing.  Find a climate expert to explain it to you.  It has to do with the fact that a warmer antarctic or mountains are still well below freezing almost the the entire year, and the earth is still not warm enough for it to rain there.

Nature will not be fooled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these temperature measurements are sort of red herrings, if for no other reason than that they are subject to human errors.  Look for changes in ecologies that indicate warming (or cooling &#8211; but there are none of those) temperatures.  Migration patterns of flora and fauna. (Flora move up mountains until they get to the top and die, or they move north)  Changes in time of migration.  Changes in sex ratios of some amphibians.  Continuously shrinking ice sheets and glaciers.  Earlier melt times and later freeze times of large bodies of water and rivers.  Average these over decades.   </p>
<p>And before some ignoramus points  to more ice and snow in the antarctic, let me say that that is evidence of global warming, not cooling.  This is also true of glaciers that grow in areas that, despite general warming,  still seldom get above freezing.  Find a climate expert to explain it to you.  It has to do with the fact that a warmer antarctic or mountains are still well below freezing almost the the entire year, and the earth is still not warm enough for it to rain there.</p>
<p>Nature will not be fooled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faster than everyplace else&#8230; &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/#comment-236309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faster than everyplace else&#8230; &#124; Watts Up With That?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1880#comment-236309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A New Leaderboard at the U.S. Open « Climate Audit Four of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well down the leaderboard, behind even 1900. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A New Leaderboard at the U.S. Open « Climate Audit Four of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well down the leaderboard, behind even 1900. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ryan</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/#comment-224365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1880#comment-224365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Use  NOAA  data  they are more accurate and the official temp keepers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use  NOAA  data  they are more accurate and the official temp keepers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M. from TN</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/#comment-223791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve M. from TN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1880#comment-223791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[never mind my last post..I didn&#039;t look at the original date for your post]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never mind my last post..I didn&#8217;t look at the original date for your post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M. from TN</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/#comment-223788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve M. from TN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1880#comment-223788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999)&lt;/i&gt;

Very generous of you to include 1998 and 1999 in the last 10 years. 2000-2009 would be the last 10 years, and only 1 year (2006) falls in that category.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999)</i></p>
<p>Very generous of you to include 1998 and 1999 in the last 10 years. 2000-2009 would be the last 10 years, and only 1 year (2006) falls in that category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CST: Guess Which Years Are Now The Hottest : Stop The ACLU</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/#comment-223745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CST: Guess Which Years Are Now The Hottest : Stop The ACLU]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1880#comment-223745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you see, in reality Four of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you see, in reality Four of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CST: Guess Which Years Are Now The Hottest &#124; Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/#comment-223744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CST: Guess Which Years Are Now The Hottest &#124; Right Wing News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1880#comment-223744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 1980s and 1990s which has since peaked, says the World Meteorological Organisation.Well, you see, in realityFour of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1980s and 1990s which has since peaked, says the World Meteorological Organisation.Well, you see, in realityFour of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CST: Guess Which Years Are Now The Hottest &#187; Pirate&#39;s Cove</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/08/a-new-leaderboard-at-the-us-open/#comment-223743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CST: Guess Which Years Are Now The Hottest &#187; Pirate&#39;s Cove]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1880#comment-223743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you see, in reality Four of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you see, in reality Four of the top 10 are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

