<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve interviewed on BBC Radio 4 &quot;Today&quot; programme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will C.</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/#comment-99789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1932#comment-99789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, can you provide a permalink to the BBC interview on your website.  I think it should be archived in ClimateAudit.

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, can you provide a permalink to the BBC interview on your website.  I think it should be archived in ClimateAudit.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarryW</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/#comment-99788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BarryW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1932#comment-99788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re #37

With respect to the first graph.  What do the climatologist have to say about the divergence of the land record from the ocean sometime in the 1980&#039;s?  To me that would appear to be something seriously wrong.  What event, cosmic or otherwise cause a change like that?  Maybe the fall of the Soviet Union?  Third world industrialization (India, China)? Someone have plots of the temps by continent?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re #37</p>
<p>With respect to the first graph.  What do the climatologist have to say about the divergence of the land record from the ocean sometime in the 1980&#8242;s?  To me that would appear to be something seriously wrong.  What event, cosmic or otherwise cause a change like that?  Maybe the fall of the Soviet Union?  Third world industrialization (India, China)? Someone have plots of the temps by continent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Hissink</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/#comment-99787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Hissink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1932#comment-99787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The one fact which I find interesting is that the small correction so made by Steve actually shows that the temperature plot versus time is hardly robust when small changes can lead to signficant changes in results and thus interpretation.  This strongly suggests the temperature anomalies are  random in nature rather than having any causal relationship vs time which is what AGW is based on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one fact which I find interesting is that the small correction so made by Steve actually shows that the temperature plot versus time is hardly robust when small changes can lead to signficant changes in results and thus interpretation.  This strongly suggests the temperature anomalies are  random in nature rather than having any causal relationship vs time which is what AGW is based on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul graham</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/#comment-99786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paul graham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1932#comment-99786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PHE# The reason for the jump is tempeture are filter/smoother over a certian period most likly five years.
The technique though valid has pronounced effects of the last years graph, where it can exagerate any tempeture increase, or even produce increase that don&#039;t exist.

for instance &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/hadleycentre/CR_data/Monthly/NMAT_SST_LSAT_plot.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this graph&lt;/a&gt; gives the impression that tempetures are still rising, due to a 35 year filtering. When in fact tempetures have stagnaged since 2000; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/hadleycentre/CR_data/Monthly/HadCRUGNS_3plots.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;

If fact severial of Steves posting have been on this; have alook at the &#039;hockey stick graph&#039; entries, and you&#039;ll see this is a very complex science.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHE# The reason for the jump is tempeture are filter/smoother over a certian period most likly five years.<br />
The technique though valid has pronounced effects of the last years graph, where it can exagerate any tempeture increase, or even produce increase that don&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>for instance <a href="http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/hadleycentre/CR_data/Monthly/NMAT_SST_LSAT_plot.gif" rel="nofollow">this graph</a> gives the impression that tempetures are still rising, due to a 35 year filtering. When in fact tempetures have stagnaged since 2000; <a href="http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/hadleycentre/CR_data/Monthly/HadCRUGNS_3plots.gif" rel="nofollow">click here</a></p>
<p>If fact severial of Steves posting have been on this; have alook at the &#8216;hockey stick graph&#8217; entries, and you&#8217;ll see this is a very complex science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Moore</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/#comment-99785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1932#comment-99785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good interview, Steve!

I&#039;ll second the knighthood.

PS: RP can be installed quickly and configured so as to not interfere with WMP.

PPSS: I played the entire clip. I especially enjoyed the report about Robert Mugabe -- that&#039;s a fellow who should be dragged down a gravel road with his ears nailed to a truck bumper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good interview, Steve!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll second the knighthood.</p>
<p>PS: RP can be installed quickly and configured so as to not interfere with WMP.</p>
<p>PPSS: I played the entire clip. I especially enjoyed the report about Robert Mugabe &#8212; that&#8217;s a fellow who should be dragged down a gravel road with his ears nailed to a truck bumper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/#comment-99784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1932#comment-99784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PHE : Because they decided the correct way to remove the jump was to adjust the data before 2000 to match the data after, rather than the other way around. Don&#039;t ask me if that&#039;s the correct thing to do, but it is what I remember our esteemed host explaining that they did.

So, it makes sense that 1990s values would have changed, then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHE : Because they decided the correct way to remove the jump was to adjust the data before 2000 to match the data after, rather than the other way around. Don&#8217;t ask me if that&#8217;s the correct thing to do, but it is what I remember our esteemed host explaining that they did.</p>
<p>So, it makes sense that 1990s values would have changed, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STAFFAN LINDSTRÖM</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/#comment-99783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[STAFFAN LINDSTRÖM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1932#comment-99783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#16 PHE DLed the DT article, both the Guardian
and the DT calls Steve an &quot;amateur meteorologist&quot;
I&#039;m pretty sure that that is meant to be at least somewhat
derogative for them but have they ever known the
meaning of &quot;amateur&quot; ie somebody who loves what she
or he does...??? The download took 30 seconds(!)(240 kb) I
have 8 MB/S broadband, well sort of ...WDR3 AND PR P2
downstreaming =96kbps Usually 1200-1400 kbps is the
normal bandwidth capacity down ...So I would say every
one is googling Steve M by now...Could anyone provide

us with similar experiences UK time 2007 Aug 17 23:33 pm ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#16 PHE DLed the DT article, both the Guardian<br />
and the DT calls Steve an &#8220;amateur meteorologist&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;m pretty sure that that is meant to be at least somewhat<br />
derogative for them but have they ever known the<br />
meaning of &#8220;amateur&#8221; ie somebody who loves what she<br />
or he does&#8230;??? The download took 30 seconds(!)(240 kb) I<br />
have 8 MB/S broadband, well sort of &#8230;WDR3 AND PR P2<br />
downstreaming =96kbps Usually 1200-1400 kbps is the<br />
normal bandwidth capacity down &#8230;So I would say every<br />
one is googling Steve M by now&#8230;Could anyone provide</p>
<p>us with similar experiences UK time 2007 Aug 17 23:33 pm &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Dueck</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/#comment-99782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Dueck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1932#comment-99782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adrian
We have the priviledge of having CBC, and now, BBC news coverage. I concur with your assessment of bias and add the CBC to that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian<br />
We have the priviledge of having CBC, and now, BBC news coverage. I concur with your assessment of bias and add the CBC to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Starks</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/#comment-99781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Starks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1932#comment-99781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE29
The BBC are very one sided when it comes to Climate Change, and were critised in a recent high level  report for this. Jeremy Paxman  their &quot;Hard Man&quot; of newsnight has also confirmed this. Personally I feel their presentation of the issues are disgusting, frequently making casual links and spewing out green propoganda.
The problem is the BBC will hype what it thinks is important, for example when we had the nice weather here in the UK, they were only to pleased to hint at Global Warming causing this, and this would be the hottest year on record etc, and any one in the UK knows the rest, mother nature didnt sing to the BBC hymm sheet and we&#039;ve had one of the coolest summers for years. Mind you this didnt stop them saying that this to could be a sign.
Well done Steve your hard worki is paying off]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE29<br />
The BBC are very one sided when it comes to Climate Change, and were critised in a recent high level  report for this. Jeremy Paxman  their &#8220;Hard Man&#8221; of newsnight has also confirmed this. Personally I feel their presentation of the issues are disgusting, frequently making casual links and spewing out green propoganda.<br />
The problem is the BBC will hype what it thinks is important, for example when we had the nice weather here in the UK, they were only to pleased to hint at Global Warming causing this, and this would be the hottest year on record etc, and any one in the UK knows the rest, mother nature didnt sing to the BBC hymm sheet and we&#8217;ve had one of the coolest summers for years. Mind you this didnt stop them saying that this to could be a sign.<br />
Well done Steve your hard worki is paying off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris D</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/08/17/steve-interviewed-on-bbc-radio-4-today-programme/#comment-99780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1932#comment-99780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit OT, but an interesting aside re: BBC:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/06/17/nbbc217.xml]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit OT, but an interesting aside re: BBC:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/06/17/nbbc217.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/06/17/nbbc217.xml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
