Comments on: First Look at the USHCN Quality Classification http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/ by Steve McIntyre Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:15:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: A Second Look at USHCN Classification « Climate Audit http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/#comment-345361 Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:04:33 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2061#comment-345361 [...] Yesterday, I posted up a first look at differences between station histories classified as CRN=1 (good) versus CRN=5 (bad) – a simple comparison of averages, noting that other factors may well enter into the comparison. [...]

]]> By: Kenneth Fritsch http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/#comment-106065 Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:59:30 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2061#comment-106065 Sod, you might want to look at the following links and determine for yourself whether we have moved beyond John V’s initial work. I would much appreciate hearing from John V again on this matter.

Remember the thread was titled a “First Look…”

Post #52 here:

http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4852#comment-320818

and Post #130 here:

http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3169

]]> By: sod http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/#comment-106064 Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:11:40 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2061#comment-106064 thanks to John V.

very good work. as always.

]]> By: Hans Erren http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/#comment-106063 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:42:59 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2061#comment-106063 thanks!

I notice a weird behavior of the crn5-crn12 annual difference between 1983 and 1997

]]> By: Kenneth Fritsch http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/#comment-106062 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:36:39 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2061#comment-106062 Re: #168

John V., thanks for the data — and it will not require me to break the Excel habit just now. I down loaded the CRN12 and CRN5 data last night and will do my favored analysis as time permits.

]]> By: steven mosher http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/#comment-106061 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:16:48 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2061#comment-106061 re 169.

Ditto on Sam U.

]]> By: Sam Urbinto http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/#comment-106060 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:25:41 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2061#comment-106060 John V, it certainly seems to me that since you’ve been here you’ve come to a few realizations. And you’re doing a great job too. Keep it up!

I don’t care what the truth is, I just want to know what it is. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. :)

]]> By: John V. http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/#comment-106059 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:24:07 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2061#comment-106059 #167 Hans Erren:
All of my results and code for the plost in this thread are here:
http://www.opentemp.org/_results/20070916_Release.zip

The raw GISTEMP data is available here:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.D.txt
(go one level up for the source page)

]]> By: Hans Erren http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/#comment-106058 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:17:48 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2061#comment-106058 sorry to nag you JohnV, but do you have http://www.inturnsoftware.com/downloads/crn12_crn5_giss.gif in tabular format?

]]> By: SteveSadlov http://climateaudit.org/2007/09/14/a-first-look-at-the-ushcn-quality-classification/#comment-106057 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:02:02 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2061#comment-106057 RE: #165 – I fully expect you to walk the talk. Here, and elsewhere.

]]>