Comments on: A Custom R Function http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/25/a-custom-r-function/ by Steve McIntyre Thu, 23 May 2013 18:47:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: M. Simon http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/25/a-custom-r-function/#comment-120159 Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:20:54 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2446#comment-120159 When you show weightings by area is the area referenced to the map (high latitudes get larger areas) or are the area independent of the map area?

That is one of the main failings of Mercator – it does not show areas properly. Dymaxion is better in that respect.

]]> By: M. Simon http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/25/a-custom-r-function/#comment-120158 Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:01:30 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2446#comment-120158 Is Mercator the best projection?

Have you considered something like the Dymaxion Projection (onto an icosa)?

]]> By: thetruthwillsetyoufree http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/25/a-custom-r-function/#comment-120157 Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:30:24 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2446#comment-120157 Nah….a Highlanders’ fan from Otago.

]]> By: Fred http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/25/a-custom-r-function/#comment-120156 Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:26:09 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2446#comment-120156 Blue & Gold . . . so you are a closet Bomber fan ??

]]>