<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 Blown off track:  Northern Hemisphere Historic Cyclone Inactivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:33:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Tropical Cyclone activity is at 33-year lows &#124; NW0.eu</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/#comment-243144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Tropical Cyclone activity is at 33-year lows &#124; NW0.eu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2471#comment-243144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 2002, 2004, 2006, 2009]Flashback to October 2007: I posted on Steve McIntyre’s Climate Audit the following:The North Atlantic was not the only ocean seeing quiet tropical cyclone activity. When using the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2002, 2004, 2006, 2009]Flashback to October 2007: I posted on Steve McIntyre’s Climate Audit the following:The North Atlantic was not the only ocean seeing quiet tropical cyclone activity. When using the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Tropical Cyclone activity is at 33-year lows &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/#comment-242798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Tropical Cyclone activity is at 33-year lows &#124; Watts Up With That?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2471#comment-242798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] [La Nina years:  1950, 1954-6, 1962, 1964, 1967, 1970-1, 1973-5, 1988, 1998-9, 2007-8 and El Nino years:  1951, 1957, 1963, 1965, 1972, 1976-7, 1979, 1982-3, 1986-7, 1991-4, 1997, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2009] Flashback to October 2007: I posted on Steve McIntyre&#8217;s Climate Audit the following: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [La Nina years:  1950, 1954-6, 1962, 1964, 1967, 1970-1, 1973-5, 1988, 1998-9, 2007-8 and El Nino years:  1951, 1957, 1963, 1965, 1972, 1976-7, 1979, 1982-3, 1986-7, 1991-4, 1997, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2009] Flashback to October 2007: I posted on Steve McIntyre&#8217;s Climate Audit the following: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEFINITIVE PROOF THAT GLOBAL WARMING IS NOT HAPPENING? &#171; word of mouth</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/#comment-122989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DEFINITIVE PROOF THAT GLOBAL WARMING IS NOT HAPPENING? &#171; word of mouth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2471#comment-122989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] previously reported here and here at Climate Audit, and chronicled at my Florida State Global Hurricane Update page, both [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previously reported here and here at Climate Audit, and chronicled at my Florida State Global Hurricane Update page, both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tennesseefree.com &#187; Remember Al Gore and Global Warming?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/#comment-122988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tennesseefree.com &#187; Remember Al Gore and Global Warming?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2471#comment-122988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As previously reported here and here at Climate Audit, and chronicled at my Florida State Global Hurricane Update page, both [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As previously reported here and here at Climate Audit, and chronicled at my Florida State Global Hurricane Update page, both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulric Lyons</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/#comment-122986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulric Lyons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2471#comment-122986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2001, 2000, 1994, 1990, 1982, 1981, 1978, 1973, 1962, 1951, 1937, 1931, 1930, 1922, 1914, 1907, 1905, 1902, no US landfall hurricanes. I can see what is occurring, but I don`t think SM would want to know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2001, 2000, 1994, 1990, 1982, 1981, 1978, 1973, 1962, 1951, 1937, 1931, 1930, 1922, 1914, 1907, 1905, 1902, no US landfall hurricanes. I can see what is occurring, but I don`t think SM would want to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveSadlov</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/#comment-122985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveSadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2471#comment-122985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tongue planted firmly in cheek:

HURRICANE NOGURI - 1805 Z, 11-JAN-08

EARLIER TODAY, TYPHOON NOGURI CROSSED 180, AFTER A SIGNIFICANT LEFTWARD / NORTHWARD WOBBLE. THIS STORM IS NOW DESIGNATED AS HURRICANE NOGURI, A CATEGORY ONE HURRICANE. LOCATION IS 179W, 40N, TRACK HAS RESUMED ESE. AT THIS TIME, THIS FEATURE IS OF NOTE SOLELY TO MARINE TRAFFIC (ESPECIALLY DUMB SHIPS) AS IT IS EXPECTED TO PULL UP STATIONARY AGAINST A PROGRESSIVE RIDGE PROG&#039;ED TO BE ALONG 14OW AT THE TIME. STORM IS PROG&#039;ED TO THEN LOSE STRENGTH, AND, IF IT EVER REACHES LAND, SHOULD BE A TD, AT MOST. NONETHELESS ... THIS IS THE 4TH NAMED STORM (AND 4TH HURRICANE!) IN THIS HIGHLY UNPRECEDENTED 2008 SEASON. RETROSPECTIVELY, CHANGING SEASON TO YEAR ROUND (JAN 01 THROUGH DEC 31) WAS A *WISE* CHOICE. EOT. FORECASTER - HAY-MAN.

Posted by stevesadlov at 10:05 AM 0 comments

HURRICANE BORIS - TS WATCH - 1755Z, 11-JAN-08

THE NATIONAL HYSTERIA CENTER (&quot;NHC&quot;), NEPAC DIVISION, HAS ISSUED A TROPICAL STORM WATCH FOR THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA, BETWEEN VICTORIA, AND, JUNEAU. HURRICANE BORIS, A CATEGORY ONE HURRICANE, IS CURRENTLY LOCATED AT 150W, 42N, AND IS ON A STEADY NE TRACK. GIVEN SST&#039;S (WHICH LOWER CLOSER TO LAND, DUE TO UPWELLING AND THE LONG SHORE CURRENT OUT OF THE NORTH), WE EXPECT SOME REDUCTION IN STRENGTH, DOWN TO TS LEVEL, PRIOR TO LANDFALL. LANDFALL IS PROG&#039;ED FOR SOME TIME LATE Z TOMORROW OR EARLY Z THE FOLLOWING DAY. STRONG WINDS, HEAVY FLOODING RAINS AND NOTABLE STORM SURGE ALONG WITH DANGEROUS SURF CONDITIONS CAN BE EXPECTED IN THE LAND FALL ZONE, PARTICULARLY IN THE RIGHT, FRONT QUADRANT OF THE STORM. NEXT UPDATE, EARLY, 12-JAN-08 Z. EOT. FORECASTER - HOLDEN.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tongue planted firmly in cheek:</p>
<p>HURRICANE NOGURI &#8211; 1805 Z, 11-JAN-08</p>
<p>EARLIER TODAY, TYPHOON NOGURI CROSSED 180, AFTER A SIGNIFICANT LEFTWARD / NORTHWARD WOBBLE. THIS STORM IS NOW DESIGNATED AS HURRICANE NOGURI, A CATEGORY ONE HURRICANE. LOCATION IS 179W, 40N, TRACK HAS RESUMED ESE. AT THIS TIME, THIS FEATURE IS OF NOTE SOLELY TO MARINE TRAFFIC (ESPECIALLY DUMB SHIPS) AS IT IS EXPECTED TO PULL UP STATIONARY AGAINST A PROGRESSIVE RIDGE PROG&#8217;ED TO BE ALONG 14OW AT THE TIME. STORM IS PROG&#8217;ED TO THEN LOSE STRENGTH, AND, IF IT EVER REACHES LAND, SHOULD BE A TD, AT MOST. NONETHELESS &#8230; THIS IS THE 4TH NAMED STORM (AND 4TH HURRICANE!) IN THIS HIGHLY UNPRECEDENTED 2008 SEASON. RETROSPECTIVELY, CHANGING SEASON TO YEAR ROUND (JAN 01 THROUGH DEC 31) WAS A *WISE* CHOICE. EOT. FORECASTER &#8211; HAY-MAN.</p>
<p>Posted by stevesadlov at 10:05 AM 0 comments</p>
<p>HURRICANE BORIS &#8211; TS WATCH &#8211; 1755Z, 11-JAN-08</p>
<p>THE NATIONAL HYSTERIA CENTER (&#8220;NHC&#8221;), NEPAC DIVISION, HAS ISSUED A TROPICAL STORM WATCH FOR THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA, BETWEEN VICTORIA, AND, JUNEAU. HURRICANE BORIS, A CATEGORY ONE HURRICANE, IS CURRENTLY LOCATED AT 150W, 42N, AND IS ON A STEADY NE TRACK. GIVEN SST&#8217;S (WHICH LOWER CLOSER TO LAND, DUE TO UPWELLING AND THE LONG SHORE CURRENT OUT OF THE NORTH), WE EXPECT SOME REDUCTION IN STRENGTH, DOWN TO TS LEVEL, PRIOR TO LANDFALL. LANDFALL IS PROG&#8217;ED FOR SOME TIME LATE Z TOMORROW OR EARLY Z THE FOLLOWING DAY. STRONG WINDS, HEAVY FLOODING RAINS AND NOTABLE STORM SURGE ALONG WITH DANGEROUS SURF CONDITIONS CAN BE EXPECTED IN THE LAND FALL ZONE, PARTICULARLY IN THE RIGHT, FRONT QUADRANT OF THE STORM. NEXT UPDATE, EARLY, 12-JAN-08 Z. EOT. FORECASTER &#8211; HOLDEN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Maue</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/#comment-122984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Maue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2471#comment-122984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It snowed in Baghdad today.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KQAQ/2008/1/11/DailyHistory.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Hourly Reports &lt;/a&gt;

Of course, odd or unusual weather in a location is heralded as an example of climate change or global warming, and this event is no exception.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5huPkYk4bGVvo1Sa1tWeH-tgENiFw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Iraq snow = climate change &lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt; These snowfalls are linked to the climate change that is happening everywhere. We are finding some places in the world which are warm and are supposed to be cold.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have an alternative explanation:  it is winter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It snowed in Baghdad today.  <a href="http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KQAQ/2008/1/11/DailyHistory.html" rel="nofollow"> Hourly Reports </a></p>
<p>Of course, odd or unusual weather in a location is heralded as an example of climate change or global warming, and this event is no exception.  <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5huPkYk4bGVvo1Sa1tWeH-tgENiFw" rel="nofollow"> Iraq snow = climate change </a></p>
<blockquote><p> These snowfalls are linked to the climate change that is happening everywhere. We are finding some places in the world which are warm and are supposed to be cold.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>I have an alternative explanation:  it is winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/#comment-122983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2471#comment-122983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ryan Maue updated his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; global storm webpage &lt;/a&gt; to cover all of 2007, using ACE as the measure of activity. A non-ACE superlative for 2007 was that the year holds the record for longest global period without a tropical cyclone, I think it was 30 or 40 days (I forget the number), back in the northern spring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan Maue updated his <a href="http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/" rel="nofollow"> global storm webpage </a> to cover all of 2007, using ACE as the measure of activity. A non-ACE superlative for 2007 was that the year holds the record for longest global period without a tropical cyclone, I think it was 30 or 40 days (I forget the number), back in the northern spring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveSadlov</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/#comment-122982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveSadlov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2471#comment-122982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE: #100 - As I pointed out all season, they no longer use a multi criterion approach to name and claim. The de facto Op Def of a TC has had a lowering of the bar. This time they were blatant about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: #100 &#8211; As I pointed out all season, they no longer use a multi criterion approach to name and claim. The de facto Op Def of a TC has had a lowering of the bar. This time they were blatant about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2007/11/30/2007-blown-off-track-northern-hemisphere-historic-cyclone-inactivity/#comment-122981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2471#comment-122981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olga had an ACE value of 0.66 (typical is about 9.0). It lasted 21 hours as a tropical storm, though the NHC acknowledges that their windspeed estimates for Olga&#039;s final 13 hours may have been &quot;generous&quot;.

The final six hours included this note from the NHC:



&lt;blockquote&gt;
OLGA LACKS THE CONVECTION REQUIRED OF A TROPICAL CYCLONE...AND BASED
ON VISIBLE SATELLITE IMAGERY PROBABLY ALSO LACKS A CLOSED SURFACE
CIRCULATION.  HOWEVER...WE WILL HANG ON TO OLGA FOR A FEW MORE
HOURS JUST IN CASE DEEP CONVECTION RETURNS OR WEST WINDS BECOME
EVIDENT. &lt;/blockquote&gt;


At the time it was declared to be &quot;tropical&quot; it had been over land (Dominican Republic peninsula) for six hours and was entering the very rugged mountains of that island. The NHC based its tropical classification on



&lt;blockquote&gt;THE PROXIMITY OF THE WINDS TO THE CENTER AND THE
PRESENCE OF DEEP CONVECTION SUGGESTED THAT OLGA MADE THE TRANSITION
TO A TROPICAL STORM. RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT COULD NOT MEASURE DATA
FROM OLGA&#039;S CENTER BECAUSE THE CYCLONE HAD ALREADY MOVED INLAND
PRIOR TO A POSSIBLE PENETRATION&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is weak. There was no measurement of a warm core, any winds and precipitation were affected by land/mountain interaction and the winds were still removed from the center. On the consequence side, the system was about to die in the Hispaniola mountains. Why make the classification change based on such weak conjecture? It baffles me. I hope they reconsider the classification when the reanalysis is performed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olga had an ACE value of 0.66 (typical is about 9.0). It lasted 21 hours as a tropical storm, though the NHC acknowledges that their windspeed estimates for Olga&#8217;s final 13 hours may have been &#8220;generous&#8221;.</p>
<p>The final six hours included this note from the NHC:</p>
<blockquote><p>
OLGA LACKS THE CONVECTION REQUIRED OF A TROPICAL CYCLONE&#8230;AND BASED<br />
ON VISIBLE SATELLITE IMAGERY PROBABLY ALSO LACKS A CLOSED SURFACE<br />
CIRCULATION.  HOWEVER&#8230;WE WILL HANG ON TO OLGA FOR A FEW MORE<br />
HOURS JUST IN CASE DEEP CONVECTION RETURNS OR WEST WINDS BECOME<br />
EVIDENT. </p></blockquote>
<p>At the time it was declared to be &#8220;tropical&#8221; it had been over land (Dominican Republic peninsula) for six hours and was entering the very rugged mountains of that island. The NHC based its tropical classification on</p>
<blockquote><p>THE PROXIMITY OF THE WINDS TO THE CENTER AND THE<br />
PRESENCE OF DEEP CONVECTION SUGGESTED THAT OLGA MADE THE TRANSITION<br />
TO A TROPICAL STORM. RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT COULD NOT MEASURE DATA<br />
FROM OLGA&#8217;S CENTER BECAUSE THE CYCLONE HAD ALREADY MOVED INLAND<br />
PRIOR TO A POSSIBLE PENETRATION</p></blockquote>
<p>That is weak. There was no measurement of a warm core, any winds and precipitation were affected by land/mountain interaction and the winds were still removed from the center. On the consequence side, the system was about to die in the Hispaniola mountains. Why make the classification change based on such weak conjecture? It baffles me. I hope they reconsider the classification when the reanalysis is performed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
