Comments on: A NASA Request for Review http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/ by Steve McIntyre Tue, 21 May 2013 15:32:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Nasif Nahle http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/#comment-130045 Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:02:35 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2556#comment-130045 # 40

I’m referring only to climate related information, although some information on climate science is not biased.

]]> By: Luboš Motl http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/#comment-130044 Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:29:40 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2556#comment-130044 The incident on Mars was caused by the Martian hippies, see the photograph here:

http://www.pkblogs.com/motls/2005/09/martians-discovered.html

]]> By: John Creighton http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/#comment-130043 Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:47:42 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2556#comment-130043 #37 do you have any proof of your assertion? It was my understand that all raw NASA data from the planetary missions was available to the public for free.

]]> By: steven mosher http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/#comment-130042 Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:59:32 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2556#comment-130042 Yes,

I merely offer the example of lancett up as a brick in the wall.

Refusal to supply source data and methods should be a prima facia case
for dismissing the scientific claims.

]]> By: Carl Gullans http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/#comment-130041 Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:46:20 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2556#comment-130041 #21: Mosher, I was once somewhat involved with an amatuer online group that scoured medical journals in search of novel medical uses for drugs and other natural compounds. It was well known that the Lancet was a garbage journal with virtually no publication standards or peer review as evidenced by fatally flawed study after fatally flawed study published there. In this week’s The Economist, there was a reference to “the venerable The Lancet”, and I had a good laugh at that… what do journalists know of medicine, physics, or statistics?

]]> By: Nasif Nahle http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/#comment-130040 Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:02:38 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2556#comment-130040 I would stand on a protective position of NASA because I have obtained some educational benefits from the institution, although NASA doesn’t need holidaymakers’ help. I’m subscribed to some educational programs and I’ve got many ideas for teaching to my students; however, it seems that the political hairs-splitting of a group of high influence within NASA have worked in the sense of applying filter-selection on all information that contains data which is contrary to the ideas or sickly ideology of that group. Outside the US, few people respect NASA, and they distrust of every statement related with climate or global warming generated by NASA.

]]> By: steven mosher http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/#comment-130039 Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:28:16 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2556#comment-130039 re 35.. You should know that hansen also refers to his own personal site from
the nasa web site

]]> By: welikerocks http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/#comment-130038 Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:02:17 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2556#comment-130038 SteveMac and everyone,
I got a reply on Jan 3rd about my concerns (I used the form supplied on the website)from NASA Earth Observatory Project Manager at the Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD regarding Real Climate and Gavin being referenced on their Global Warming info page. It is really very telling, and only makes my personal concerns in regards to the matter even greater. I don’t know if you want to see it (or if you want me to post it here) Let me know. I’ve had computer problems (Mac user and Tiger/FireFox issues) so I couldn’t tell you all sooner about it. The reply came really fast. The web page states it could have taken up to five weeks to get one. What a can of worms it is, and don’t know if you want to hash it all out here however, I would urge everyone to use that form and ask the tough questions, if I had only one thing to say about it all. Cheers!

]]> By: John Creighton http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/#comment-130037 Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:43:38 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2556#comment-130037 I thought NASA provided an immense amount of data the public. I’ve seen much of NASA’s data used to reconstruct virtual reality immense of MARS in various sorts of media. The compositional data is of course wildly used as well but not always as flashy as pictures.

]]> By: Nasif Nahle http://climateaudit.org/2008/01/03/a-nasa-request-for-review/#comment-130036 Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:14:10 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2556#comment-130036 A humorous thread, that’s all.

]]>