<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fortress Met Office continued</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The UK Met Office Deepens The Moat &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/#comment-317428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The UK Met Office Deepens The Moat &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208#comment-317428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Deepening moats has been a lively topic in UK politics recently. One British MP expensed the public for the cost of deepening the moat at his castle and has been forced to resign. We discussed FOI and the MP expense scandal recently. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Deepening moats has been a lively topic in UK politics recently. One British MP expensed the public for the cost of deepening the moat at his castle and has been forced to resign. We discussed FOI and the MP expense scandal recently. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, June 26 2008 &#171; The Daily Bayonet</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/#comment-244808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, June 26 2008 &#171; The Daily Bayonet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208#comment-244808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have something to hide, which is exactly what Steve McIntyre is investigating here, here, here and here.  The organizations concerned are supporters of warming theory &#8211; so why not provide the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have something to hide, which is exactly what Steve McIntyre is investigating here, here, here and here.  The organizations concerned are supporters of warming theory &#8211; so why not provide the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/#comment-225745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208#comment-225745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Cuckoo I’ll send him the file!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Cuckoo I’ll send him the file!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose on Fortress Met Office &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/#comment-220201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rose on Fortress Met Office &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208#comment-220201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Contemporary accounts of the progress of the Met Office FOIs are here here here here here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Contemporary accounts of the progress of the Met Office FOIs are here here here here here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama opens his Administration with a powerful act that will echo for many years &#171; Fabius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/#comment-151874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama opens his Administration with a powerful act that will echo for many years &#171; Fabius Maximus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208#comment-151874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] “Fortress Met Office continued“, Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, 23 June 2008. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Fortress Met Office continued“, Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, 23 June 2008. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peer review of scientific work - an inadequate basis for big public action &#171; Fabius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/#comment-151873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peer review of scientific work - an inadequate basis for big public action &#171; Fabius Maximus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208#comment-151873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] “Fortress Met Office continued“, Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, 23 June 2008. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Fortress Met Office continued“, Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, 23 June 2008. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuckooUK</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/#comment-151872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CuckooUK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208#comment-151872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David

I didn&#039;t hear from you, so i have assumed you have contacted Roger Helmer direct]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t hear from you, so i have assumed you have contacted Roger Helmer direct</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuckooUK</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/#comment-151871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CuckooUK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208#comment-151871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David

If you need the correct email address for Roger Helmer&#039;s assistant, please email at robertsbobbi@hotmail.com - my email address is a throwaway, so it doesn&#039;t matter if it stays here]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David</p>
<p>If you need the correct email address for Roger Helmer&#8217;s assistant, please email at <a href="mailto:robertsbobbi@hotmail.com">robertsbobbi@hotmail.com</a> &#8211; my email address is a throwaway, so it doesn&#8217;t matter if it stays here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Holland</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/#comment-151870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Holland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208#comment-151870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Cuckoo I&#039;ll send him the file!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Cuckoo I&#8217;ll send him the file!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuckooUK</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/06/23/fortress-met-office-continued/#comment-151869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CuckooUK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208#comment-151869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope this wasn&#039;t inappropriate, but Roger Helmer MEP did an article in a UK magazine that I happened to read, so I emailed him asking if he had seen the debate over at Climate Audit about the withholding of emails between Mitchell and the IPCC.

I have just received the following response

&lt;blockquote&gt;Roger is proposing to table the question below to the Commission/relevant UK Ministers regarding the exchange of emails between the Hadley Centre and the IPCC, which the Met Office have refused to make public.
However, before he does so he just wanted to double-check that he correctly understands the situation. Would you therefore kindly look over the proposed text to make sure that you are comfortable with it?

Many thanks and best regards,


Georgina Browes
Political Advisor to Roger Helmer MEP





&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Re: Withholding of information regarding correspondence between the Hadley Centre and the IPCC&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;


&lt;em&gt;Is the Minister/Commission aware of correspondence on climate issues between Dr. John Mitchell, Chief Scientist of the Hadley Centre, and the IPCC?



Is the Minister/Commission aware that the Met Office appears to be resisting requests, under the Freedom of Information Act, for copies of this correspondence? For more information, please use the following link: http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208



What action can the Minister/Commission take to ensure that this important correspondence, of great public interest, is published in a timely way?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I hope that was ok]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this wasn&#8217;t inappropriate, but Roger Helmer MEP did an article in a UK magazine that I happened to read, so I emailed him asking if he had seen the debate over at Climate Audit about the withholding of emails between Mitchell and the IPCC.</p>
<p>I have just received the following response</p>
<blockquote><p>Roger is proposing to table the question below to the Commission/relevant UK Ministers regarding the exchange of emails between the Hadley Centre and the IPCC, which the Met Office have refused to make public.<br />
However, before he does so he just wanted to double-check that he correctly understands the situation. Would you therefore kindly look over the proposed text to make sure that you are comfortable with it?</p>
<p>Many thanks and best regards,</p>
<p>Georgina Browes<br />
Political Advisor to Roger Helmer MEP</p>
<p><strong><em>Re: Withholding of information regarding correspondence between the Hadley Centre and the IPCC</em></strong></p>
<p><em>Is the Minister/Commission aware of correspondence on climate issues between Dr. John Mitchell, Chief Scientist of the Hadley Centre, and the IPCC?</p>
<p>Is the Minister/Commission aware that the Met Office appears to be resisting requests, under the Freedom of Information Act, for copies of this correspondence? For more information, please use the following link: <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208" rel="nofollow">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3208</a></p>
<p>What action can the Minister/Commission take to ensure that this important correspondence, of great public interest, is published in a timely way?</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I hope that was ok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

