<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Scientists and the Riemann Hypothesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:07:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skiphil</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/#comment-391154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skiphil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3249#comment-391154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Mann continues to celebrate and promote his Hockey Stick even now, in 2013:

https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelEMann/status/287259576921894914

What did Talleyrand say of the Bourbons of the Ancien Regime,
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;they have learned nothing and have forgotten nothing&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In Mann&#039;s case one may wonder what if anything he has learned in the past decade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Mann continues to celebrate and promote his Hockey Stick even now, in 2013:</p>
<p><a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelEMann/status/287259576921894914" rel="nofollow">https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelEMann/status/287259576921894914</a></p>
<p>What did Talleyrand say of the Bourbons of the Ancien Regime,</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;they have learned nothing and have forgotten nothing&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>In Mann&#8217;s case one may wonder what if anything he has learned in the past decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, July 11th 2008 &#171; The Daily Bayonet</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/#comment-240526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, July 11th 2008 &#171; The Daily Bayonet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3249#comment-240526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] McIntyre asks what would happen to climate papers if they were subjected to the same rigorous peer review process endured by mathematics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] McIntyre asks what would happen to climate papers if they were subjected to the same rigorous peer review process endured by mathematics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotandcoldEV</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/#comment-219231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hotandcoldEV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3249#comment-219231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting thread - obviously went somewhere other than the original ironic comparison about halfway through, but for the first half let me just echo what Lubos said about maths blogs and the status of Tao and Connes - they are absolutely, undeniably the creme de la creme.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thread &#8211; obviously went somewhere other than the original ironic comparison about halfway through, but for the first half let me just echo what Lubos said about maths blogs and the status of Tao and Connes &#8211; they are absolutely, undeniably the creme de la creme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotandcoldEV</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/#comment-219226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hotandcoldEV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3249#comment-219226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no Mathematics in Nature. No mathematician reads the journal for professional reasons (unless working in some very applied area).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no Mathematics in Nature. No mathematician reads the journal for professional reasons (unless working in some very applied area).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotandcoldEV</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/#comment-219222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hotandcoldEV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3249#comment-219222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wow. That is sooo out of touch. 

I&#039;m a professional mathematician and it&#039;s now *absolutely necessary* to go to the blogs to find out what is going on. (By the blogs I mean those like Terry Tao&#039;s &amp; so on.)

(btw, thanks also to whoever bumped the thread.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wow. That is sooo out of touch. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a professional mathematician and it&#8217;s now *absolutely necessary* to go to the blogs to find out what is going on. (By the blogs I mean those like Terry Tao&#8217;s &amp; so on.)</p>
<p>(btw, thanks also to whoever bumped the thread.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: es58</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/#comment-219203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[es58]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3249#comment-219203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the way, I got here by googling the combination of:

&quot;climate science&quot; &quot;soft science&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I got here by googling the combination of:</p>
<p>&#8220;climate science&#8221; &#8220;soft science&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: es58</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/#comment-219202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[es58]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3249#comment-219202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fascinating to stumble on this post 1.5 yrs later during climategate to get insight into how much of this stuff was already common knowledge in the community (eg: jones suggesting you want the data to refute his arguments - which for that part of the analogy alone would be worth it)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fascinating to stumble on this post 1.5 yrs later during climategate to get insight into how much of this stuff was already common knowledge in the community (eg: jones suggesting you want the data to refute his arguments &#8211; which for that part of the analogy alone would be worth it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niche Modeling &#187; CSIRO Data Policy: Go Pound Sand</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/#comment-153554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niche Modeling &#187; CSIRO Data Policy: Go Pound Sand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3249#comment-153554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the disputants. Often the erring party issues a correction or withdraws the paper altogether (as Xian-Jin Li recently did with a faulty proof of the Riemann Hypothesis).  Drought Exceptional Circumstances funding is massive, so getting it right is very important. The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the disputants. Often the erring party issues a correction or withdraws the paper altogether (as Xian-Jin Li recently did with a faulty proof of the Riemann Hypothesis).  Drought Exceptional Circumstances funding is massive, so getting it right is very important. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/#comment-153553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3249#comment-153553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does applauding other people&#039;s comments get snipped as well? I must add it to my list...
&lt;strong&gt;
Steve:  &lt;/strong&gt; I ask people to refrain from angry posts. Instead of praising angriness, I&#039;d appreciate it if you asked people to tone it down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does applauding other people&#8217;s comments get snipped as well? I must add it to my list&#8230;<br />
<strong><br />
Steve:  </strong> I ask people to refrain from angry posts. Instead of praising angriness, I&#8217;d appreciate it if you asked people to tone it down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian McLeod</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/07/07/climate-scientists-and-the-riemann-hypothesis/#comment-153552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian McLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3249#comment-153552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve,

I felt the quote below was apropos considering the apoplexy by some and hilarity by others.

Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood – H.L. Mencken]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>I felt the quote below was apropos considering the apoplexy by some and hilarity by others.</p>
<p>Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood – H.L. Mencken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
