<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Napoleon Use Hansen&#039;s Temperature Data?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James P</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/#comment-167751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 04:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318#comment-167751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it is any consolation, both the international weather service and 16 different countries cannot agree on a single attribute that should define what is &quot;normal&quot; in normal temperature range during a single season, much less on what is abnormal temperature variations and acceptable measurements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it is any consolation, both the international weather service and 16 different countries cannot agree on a single attribute that should define what is &#8220;normal&#8221; in normal temperature range during a single season, much less on what is abnormal temperature variations and acceptable measurements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamont County Environment &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Major climate alarmist fiasco by NASA</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/#comment-167750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lamont County Environment &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Major climate alarmist fiasco by NASA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318#comment-167750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Today, we are able to provide NASA with up-to-date weather reports confirming that October in Russia is colder than September. Verhojansk temperatures are conveniently online here and temperatures are currently a nippy -18 deg C&#8230;.(Full Story) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today, we are able to provide NASA with up-to-date weather reports confirming that October in Russia is colder than September. Verhojansk temperatures are conveniently online here and temperatures are currently a nippy -18 deg C&#8230;.(Full Story) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NOAA says October hottest on record – Oops – Maybe not &#124; Thornton and Denver Weather News and Commentary</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/#comment-167749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NOAA says October hottest on record – Oops – Maybe not &#124; Thornton and Denver Weather News and Commentary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318#comment-167749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a bit of an embarrassment for NOAA and GISS, that was pretty short lived when two blogger meteorologists went through the data and found a number of anomalies.  They discovered at least 10 Russian stations that oddly enough reported the exact same [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a bit of an embarrassment for NOAA and GISS, that was pretty short lived when two blogger meteorologists went through the data and found a number of anomalies.  They discovered at least 10 Russian stations that oddly enough reported the exact same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s colder in Russia in October than in September</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/#comment-167748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It&#8217;s colder in Russia in October than in September]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318#comment-167748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The editorial is based on Steve McIntyre&#8217;s research, reported on his site Climate Audit in the post Did Napoleon Use Hansen&#8217;s Temperature Data? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The editorial is based on Steve McIntyre&#8217;s research, reported on his site Climate Audit in the post Did Napoleon Use Hansen&#8217;s Temperature Data? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: November 2008 Update on Global Temperature - GISS &#171; Digital Diatribes</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/#comment-167747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[November 2008 Update on Global Temperature - GISS &#171; Digital Diatribes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318#comment-167747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for the perspective from Climate Audit: CA link to initial wonderment about the Russian anomalies. CA link to NASA blaming NOAA. CA link to discussion on corrected data and a &#8220;warm&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the perspective from Climate Audit: CA link to initial wonderment about the Russian anomalies. CA link to NASA blaming NOAA. CA link to discussion on corrected data and a &#8220;warm&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/#comment-167746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318#comment-167746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems to me that this &quot;carry-over&quot; of data would be very easy to check for:

Simply take the list of a station&#039;s data, and subtract it from a one-month shifted list (done twice, both shifted forward and back one month).

Any zero result is immediately suspect...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that this &#8220;carry-over&#8221; of data would be very easy to check for:</p>
<p>Simply take the list of a station&#8217;s data, and subtract it from a one-month shifted list (done twice, both shifted forward and back one month).</p>
<p>Any zero result is immediately suspect&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; Global Warming Lies Will Bring World Economic Recession</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/#comment-167745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Strata-Sphere &#187; Global Warming Lies Will Bring World Economic Recession]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318#comment-167745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] GISS data again, as it claimed there was historic warming in Russia, which turned out to really be stale September data left in the October [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GISS data again, as it claimed there was historic warming in Russia, which turned out to really be stale September data left in the October [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The world has never seen such freezing heat OR the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data &#171; UD/RK Samhälls Debatt</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/#comment-167744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The world has never seen such freezing heat OR the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data &#171; UD/RK Samhälls Debatt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318#comment-167744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318" rel="nofollow">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John F. Pittman</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/#comment-167743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John F. Pittman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318#comment-167743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-312145&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ba (#164)&lt;/a&gt;, That is a good comment. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-312145" rel="nofollow">ba (#164)</a>, That is a good comment. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ba</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/11/10/did-napoleon-use-hansens-temperature-data/#comment-167742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4318#comment-167742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Such high temperatures make one wonder if there is a thermistor being read remotely, under 2, 5 or 10 ft of insulating snow, potentially making ground temperatures and the electronic  instrumentation factors...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such high temperatures make one wonder if there is a thermistor being read remotely, under 2, 5 or 10 ft of insulating snow, potentially making ground temperatures and the electronic  instrumentation factors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

