<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mann et al 2008 &#8211; Another Error Notice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peer review of scientific work – an inadequate basis for big public action &#171; Fabius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/#comment-230677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peer review of scientific work – an inadequate basis for big public action &#171; Fabius Maximus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 23:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4535#comment-230677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  “Mann et al 2008 &#8211; Another Error Notice“, Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, 5 December 2008 — Another correction by Mann, who seems unable to credit his critics. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  “Mann et al 2008 &#8211; Another Error Notice“, Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, 5 December 2008 — Another correction by Mann, who seems unable to credit his critics. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This week&#8217;s report on the news in climate science &#171; Fabius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/#comment-169470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s report on the news in climate science &#171; Fabius Maximus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4535#comment-169470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;Mann et al 2008 - Another Error Notice&#8220;, Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, 5 December 2008 &#8212; Another correction by Mann, who [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Mann et al 2008 &#8211; Another Error Notice&#8220;, Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, 5 December 2008 &#8212; Another correction by Mann, who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHE</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/#comment-169469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PHE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4535#comment-169469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is interesting to see that the proxy data indicate it was warmer in about the year 280 than in 2000. How can this be? This is not in line with the scientific concensus. The perhaps needs to be a bit more verification.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to see that the proxy data indicate it was warmer in about the year 280 than in 2000. How can this be? This is not in line with the scientific concensus. The perhaps needs to be a bit more verification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Sherrington</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/#comment-169468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff Sherrington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4535#comment-169468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Man is a history-making creature who can neither repeat his past nor leave it behind.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

W. H. Auden (1907 - 1973)  &quot;The Dyer&#039;s Hand,&quot; 1963.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Man is a history-making creature who can neither repeat his past nor leave it behind.</p></blockquote>
<p>W. H. Auden (1907 &#8211; 1973)  &#8220;The Dyer&#8217;s Hand,&#8221; 1963.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jae</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/#comment-169467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jae]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 02:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4535#comment-169467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Mann seems to be trying, at least.  That is a positive step. It is evident that the &quot;forces&quot; behind the scenes have heard Steve Mc loud and clear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Mann seems to be trying, at least.  That is a positive step. It is evident that the &#8220;forces&#8221; behind the scenes have heard Steve Mc loud and clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/#comment-169466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 02:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4535#comment-169466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least one can conclude that Mann or one of his friends is reading here regularly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least one can conclude that Mann or one of his friends is reading here regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captdallas2</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/#comment-169465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[captdallas2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4535#comment-169465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-314666&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sam Urbinto (#4)&lt;/a&gt;,

The post deteriorated rapidly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-314666" rel="nofollow">Sam Urbinto (#4)</a>,</p>
<p>The post deteriorated rapidly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Urbinto</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/#comment-169464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Urbinto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4535#comment-169464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/07/the-missing-piece-at-the-wegman-hearing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; The missing piece at the Wegman hearing?&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/07/the-missing-piece-at-the-wegman-hearing/" rel="nofollow"> The missing piece at the Wegman hearing?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean S</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/#comment-169463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4535#comment-169463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course, it is Figure S&lt;strong&gt;7&lt;/strong&gt;a ... is it so hard to get even the error notice straight? That figure is the comparison of the original CPS NH reconstruction and the one with the &quot;potential problematic series&quot; removed. The only way validation stats can affect that figure is through the network change issue. Comparing the original figure to the new one, that&#039;s what seems to be going on since AD1000 step (in the &quot;original-7&quot; series). Notice especially the large change in AD1100 step.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, it is Figure S<strong>7</strong>a &#8230; is it so hard to get even the error notice straight? That figure is the comparison of the original CPS NH reconstruction and the one with the &#8220;potential problematic series&#8221; removed. The only way validation stats can affect that figure is through the network change issue. Comparing the original figure to the new one, that&#8217;s what seems to be going on since AD1000 step (in the &#8220;original-7&#8243; series). Notice especially the large change in AD1100 step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyL</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2008/12/05/mann-et-al-2008-another-error-notice/#comment-169462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AndyL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4535#comment-169462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apologies - this seems to have been spotted already.  Google search didn&#039;t find the update where UC uses it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies &#8211; this seems to have been spotted already.  Google search didn&#8217;t find the update where UC uses it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
