Comments on: Royal Meteorological Society Considers Data Archiving http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/ by Steve McIntyre Thu, 23 May 2013 23:06:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Peer review of scientific work - another example of a flawed basis for public policy « Fabius Maximus http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/#comment-171037 Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:02:32 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4777#comment-171037 [...] McIntyre notes (bold emphasis added): It seems odd that they {the Royal Met Society} have no policy, but they [...]

]]> By: Royal Meteorological Society Considers Data Archiving « Climate Audit | Email Marketing Tool http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/#comment-171036 Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:08:30 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4777#comment-171036 [...] Another fellow blogger added an interesting post today on Royal Meteorological Society Considers Data Archiving « Climate AuditHere’s a small readingEvery one of their reports lists all of the authors of every chapter. All of them have Web sites where they publish their phone numbers and email addresses and publications, and anyone may contact them at any time to ask questions. … [...]

]]> By: Mark T http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/#comment-171035 Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:35:43 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4777#comment-171035 Nah, Zaphod had a huuuuuge ego… hardly Ross or Steve.

Mark

]]> By: Dave Dardinger http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/#comment-171034 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:57:46 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4777#comment-171034 Re: Mark T. (#32),

BTW, I’m thinking that our genial host and his pub partner (i.e. M&M) are clearly Zaphod Beeblebrox. Of course it does have the disadvantage of making Phil here some sort of sock-puppet.

And I note there is another potential character here from HHG, namely Deep Climate. Though this nom de plume could have been from other sources.

]]> By: Mark T. http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/#comment-171033 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:10:28 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4777#comment-171033 Ah, then apparently I missed the follow-up joke! :)

Mark

]]> By: Bishop Hill http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/#comment-171032 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:57:10 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4777#comment-171032 Mark

No, I got it, I was just moving it on a bit.

]]> By: kim http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/#comment-171031 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:16:39 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4777#comment-171031 Have data archive, credibility will travel. Don’t leave home without it or your towel.
===================================================

]]> By: Mark T. http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/#comment-171030 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:56:23 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4777#comment-171030 I think you missed the joke, Bishop. Marvin is the depressed robot in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.

Mark

]]> By: Bishop Hill http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/#comment-171029 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:31:49 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4777#comment-171029 Marvin

Sigh?

Are you Gavin in disguise?

]]> By: Marvin http://climateaudit.org/2009/01/05/royal-meteorological-society-considers-data-archiving/#comment-171028 Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:19:08 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4777#comment-171028 It wouldn’t matter. You’d just ignore it anyway. Sigh.

]]>