Comments on: Climate Audit Submission to EPA

By: Stocker’s Earmarks « Climate Audit

Stocker’s Earmarks « Climate Audit — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:53:07 +0000

[...] June 23, 2009, I posted up my submission to EPA. (Re-reading this submission, I thought that it has held up well.) The [...]

By: EPA: the Endangerment Finding was not a “highly influential scientific assessment” « Climate Audit

Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:17:15 +0000

[...] was first raised at CA shortly after the release of the Endangerment Finding – see tag and here. My submission to EPA directly addressed this topic and included a review of relevant [...]

By: Shooting the Messenger — Denialism and the EPA Endangerment Finding « The Policy Lass

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:01:45 +0000

[...] The usual suspects got in on the act — here’s Steve McIntyre discussing his own reasons for becoming involved in the EPA bashing: [...]

By: The WWF and the EPA Endangerment Finding | NW0.eu

The WWF and the EPA Endangerment Finding | NW0.eu — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:55:33 +0000

[...] June, which considered this specific issue in considerable detail. See submission here, covering post here and first post on the topic [...]

By: The WWF and the EPA Endangerment Finding | Global Warming Skeptics

The WWF and the EPA Endangerment Finding | Global Warming Skeptics — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:31:07 +0000

[...] June, which considered this specific issue in considerable detail. See submission here, covering post here and first post on the topic [...]

By: The WWF and the EPA Endangerment Finding « Climate Audit

The WWF and the EPA Endangerment Finding « Climate Audit — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:29:09 +0000

[...] June, which considered this specific issue in considerable detail. See submission here, covering post here and first post on the topic [...]

By: Steve McIntyre

Steve McIntyre — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:48:23 +0000

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0171-3827.1.pdf
http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/contentStreamer?objectId=09000064809d6ad5&disposition=attachment&contentType=pdf

By: Phil.

Phil. — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:24:53 +0000

Re: Hank (#44), World Climate Report- WCR (a typo sorry).

By: Hank

Hank — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:20:53 +0000

Hey Phil – What’s WRC? Also, in the spirit of keeping the pot stirred. Don’t you think that a whistleblower over at EPA undermines the legal case for scientific certainty? If the evidence of the models, etc. is compelling I can’t imagine that anything from WRC (whatever that may be) and Carlin could really sway the administrator.
There is only one person at the top of an agency. I can’t believe it was a smart move not to pass Carlin’s report up the food chain and trust that one’s superiors would correctly judge its value.

By: Phil.

Phil. — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:05:10 +0000

Re: AKD (#34),

anonymous (17:51:36) : Folks, I work at EPA and am unfortunate enough to actually know exactly what happened. Alan Carlin knows more about climate change science than most of the people on the EPA work group that wrote the endangerment proposal. The claim that he is simply an economist is a deep disservice to Alan and is patently false.

It's a pity then that he didn't make a submission based on that knowledge rather than 'cut and paste' from WRC!