Comments on: UK Met Office Refuses to Disclose Station Data Once Again http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/ by Steve McIntyre Sat, 25 May 2013 15:03:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: A Mole « Climate Audit http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/#comment-319702 Sat, 31 Dec 2011 18:11:00 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6618#comment-319702 [...] their refusal letter, the Met Office described adverse consequences of disclosing CRU station data, an event that [...]

]]> By: The Inquiry — Submissions « The Policy Lass http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/#comment-223981 Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:15:54 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6618#comment-223981 [...] the Met Office FOI thread, he’s seen giving advice on how to proceed: [...]

]]> By: Skeptic Arguments and What the Science Says 2 - AllDeaf.com http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/#comment-212064 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:44:19 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6618#comment-212064 [...] station data on the premise that such a request would somehow threaten UK international relations. UK Met Office Refuses to Disclose Station Data Once Again Climate Audit But a month later after Climategate, station data are released en masse to the public. Met [...]

]]> By: Met Office and CRU bow to public pressure: publish data and code « Watts Up With That? http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/#comment-211836 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:42:43 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6618#comment-211836 [...] last summer, the Met Office had turned down my FOI request for station data, saying that the provision of station data to me would threaten the [...]

]]> By: Met Office Archives Data and Code « Climate Audit http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/#comment-211806 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:21:10 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6618#comment-211806 [...] last summer, the Met Office had turned down my FOI request for station data, saying that the provision of station data to me would threaten the [...]

]]> By: Climategate, “Scientific Fascism,” and Copenhagen « The LABVIRUS.COM Blog http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/#comment-208975 Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:18:30 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6618#comment-208975 [...] Neither the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia nor the British Met are able to provide their raw data to other research scientists because of the confidentiality agreements that Professor Phil Jones at CRU entered into. Unfortunately, Jones did not keep records of those agreements and, according to the British Met, can neither identify the countries with the confidentiality agreements nor provide the agreements. Earlier this year the British Met wrote the following to Steve McIntyre at Climate Audit: [...]

]]> By: Surprise, Surprise, Many Scientists Disagree On Global Warming | http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/#comment-207596 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:53:16 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6618#comment-207596 [...] Neither the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia nor the British Met are able to provide their raw data to other research scientists because of the confidentiality agreements that Professor Phil Jones at CRU entered into. Unfortunately, Jones did not keep records of those agreements and, according to the British Met, can neither identify the countries with the confidentiality agreements nor provide the agreements. Earlier this year the British Met wrote the following to Steve McIntyre at Climate Audit: [...]

]]> By: Oh, Noes! Climate Change Could Kill Italy’s Pasta! | Right Wing News http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/#comment-188518 Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:01:46 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6618#comment-188518 [...] an wet summer? The same one that had to back off on their unhinged Arctic predictions? The one that refuses to release their raw data? The one that is throwing out yet another “we only have 10 years left” prediction? [...]

]]> By: Ted O'Brien http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/#comment-188517 Sun, 09 Aug 2009 12:55:44 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6618#comment-188517 As a late arrival, not a scientist but convinced that this issue is primarily driven by politicians, not scientists, my first question is, what records were not kept? Science without thorough records is not science. Without records there can be no integrity.

I then make the observation that the Met Office’s claimed principal concern seems to be “commercial interests”. This suggests that the science is bound up in the prospect of profit, or loss if some “commercial interest” was to sue for damages. This does not promote integrity in the science.

However the public availability of slabs of the information seems to destroy the Met Office’s case anyway.

]]> By: Gerald Machnee http://climateaudit.org/2009/07/23/uk-met-offices-refuses-to-disclose-station-data-once-again/#comment-188516 Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:50:34 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6618#comment-188516 Re: Steve McIntyre (#116),
The reply should be interesting. How do you avoid the document?

]]>