<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kaufman&#039;s Stick: Iceberg Lake Varves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: welikerocks</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/#comment-193741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[welikerocks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6981#comment-193741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hope not too dead yet!
Mr.Rocks emailed his thesis adviser (and co-author) yesterday; a sedimentolgist (retired just recently) on the question of thermometry and varves.  This is what he said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Hi. I&#039;m in New England at the moment, but can give you a quick answer [if you google &#039;varve&#039; you&#039;ll be overwhelmed with info]. By definition varves are annual cycles. Most commonly the term is applied to glacial lake seds. If marine, oxygen isotopes can be used to get paleotemperatures [perhaps in lakes too if any calcareous plankton are found]. The Greenland ice cores are varved in that they have annual cycles with data going back 15K+ years and trapped gas can yield O-isotope paleotemp data.  Hope this helps.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope not too dead yet!<br />
Mr.Rocks emailed his thesis adviser (and co-author) yesterday; a sedimentolgist (retired just recently) on the question of thermometry and varves.  This is what he said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hi. I&#8217;m in New England at the moment, but can give you a quick answer [if you google 'varve' you'll be overwhelmed with info]. By definition varves are annual cycles. Most commonly the term is applied to glacial lake seds. If marine, oxygen isotopes can be used to get paleotemperatures [perhaps in lakes too if any calcareous plankton are found]. The Greenland ice cores are varved in that they have annual cycles with data going back 15K+ years and trapped gas can yield O-isotope paleotemp data.  Hope this helps.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlc</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/#comment-193740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6981#comment-193740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John S - good point.  I will discuss in a future opportunity.  This thread is just about dead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John S &#8211; good point.  I will discuss in a future opportunity.  This thread is just about dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S.</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/#comment-193739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6981#comment-193739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-355784&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jlc (#79)&lt;/a&gt;,

I should be the last one here to deny anyone their poetic license!

On a more serious note, I&#039;d be very interested in hearing your views on Andean lake sediments as temperature (or ENSO) proxies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-355784" rel="nofollow">jlc (#79)</a>,</p>
<p>I should be the last one here to deny anyone their poetic license!</p>
<p>On a more serious note, I&#8217;d be very interested in hearing your views on Andean lake sediments as temperature (or ENSO) proxies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S.</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/#comment-193738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6981#comment-193738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sedimentolgy deserves to be called a brave field, because of the formidable complexity of nonlinear problems that it faces.  Even the classic problem of deposition of sediment load in a river delta, where persistent density currents are observed in a slowing, semi-steady,  quasi-laminar flow, is by no means simple hydrodynamics.  In limnological cases one faces the added complexity of load development (i.e., sediment pick-up from the runoff basin) from episodic rainfall events.  All of this involves viscous, turbulent flow that interacts with the flow-channel boundaries in unpredictable ways.  And strong winds (even staid Fenno-Scandia is raked occasionally by gales of 50 knots or more) may disturb the unconsolidated stratigraphy through wave action in shallow lakes.

For any proxy to be reliable, it must be coherent over a wide range of frequencies with the signal of interest.  Varves may indeed provide some useful indication of precipitation intensity over decadal time-scales or longer.  But with the latter being being only tenuously coherent with similar-scale temperature variations, it seems difficult to make a rigorous scientific case for any supposed thermometry by varves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sedimentolgy deserves to be called a brave field, because of the formidable complexity of nonlinear problems that it faces.  Even the classic problem of deposition of sediment load in a river delta, where persistent density currents are observed in a slowing, semi-steady,  quasi-laminar flow, is by no means simple hydrodynamics.  In limnological cases one faces the added complexity of load development (i.e., sediment pick-up from the runoff basin) from episodic rainfall events.  All of this involves viscous, turbulent flow that interacts with the flow-channel boundaries in unpredictable ways.  And strong winds (even staid Fenno-Scandia is raked occasionally by gales of 50 knots or more) may disturb the unconsolidated stratigraphy through wave action in shallow lakes.</p>
<p>For any proxy to be reliable, it must be coherent over a wide range of frequencies with the signal of interest.  Varves may indeed provide some useful indication of precipitation intensity over decadal time-scales or longer.  But with the latter being being only tenuously coherent with similar-scale temperature variations, it seems difficult to make a rigorous scientific case for any supposed thermometry by varves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hu McCulloch</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/#comment-193737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hu McCulloch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6981#comment-193737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RE Geoff Sherrington, #83,
&lt;blockquote&gt;
is it not facile and a bit like that other blog&#039;s errors to dismiss work in a field before you have brought yourself up to steam?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Amen!
&lt;blockquote&gt;
... thixotropy ...
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Thixotropy? What rhymes with thixotropy?? ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE Geoff Sherrington, #83,</p>
<blockquote><p>
is it not facile and a bit like that other blog&#8217;s errors to dismiss work in a field before you have brought yourself up to steam?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Amen!</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8230; thixotropy &#8230;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Thixotropy? What rhymes with thixotropy?? <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Sherrington</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/#comment-193736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff Sherrington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6981#comment-193736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry if I sound a bit grumpy here, but is it not facile and a bit like that other blog&#039;s errors to dismiss work in a field before you have brought yourself up to steam? There might be some innate proxy value for temperature in varve properties. My inclination is to think not, because of the amount of stationarity one needs to assume; and because of the difficulty of calibrating varve properties with local temperature. But I so not dismiss it out of hand. One still has to go through the processes of reason and learn from the research of others.

For a direct linkage, temperatures taken in the instrumented era have to deal with extremely recent sediments. It is well known in geology that it can take many orders of magnitude more time for the normal effects of dewatering, compaction, metamorphism (if any), shearing, folding, intrusion by other bodies, alteration of provenance, thixotropy and so on before a sedimentary pile can be regarded as having completed its formation - if it ever does complete its formation. Even 5000 feet down in the Mississippi mud there are active processes at work.

To derive temperature properties from recent varves, one has either to go via an intermediate (like dendrothermometry or some types of isotope work), or determine the rather exact progression from a sediment layer put down this year to one put down thousands of years ago. Where does the varve under study sit in this spectrum of change? The answer is generally unknown within adequate accuracy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if I sound a bit grumpy here, but is it not facile and a bit like that other blog&#8217;s errors to dismiss work in a field before you have brought yourself up to steam? There might be some innate proxy value for temperature in varve properties. My inclination is to think not, because of the amount of stationarity one needs to assume; and because of the difficulty of calibrating varve properties with local temperature. But I so not dismiss it out of hand. One still has to go through the processes of reason and learn from the research of others.</p>
<p>For a direct linkage, temperatures taken in the instrumented era have to deal with extremely recent sediments. It is well known in geology that it can take many orders of magnitude more time for the normal effects of dewatering, compaction, metamorphism (if any), shearing, folding, intrusion by other bodies, alteration of provenance, thixotropy and so on before a sedimentary pile can be regarded as having completed its formation &#8211; if it ever does complete its formation. Even 5000 feet down in the Mississippi mud there are active processes at work.</p>
<p>To derive temperature properties from recent varves, one has either to go via an intermediate (like dendrothermometry or some types of isotope work), or determine the rather exact progression from a sediment layer put down this year to one put down thousands of years ago. Where does the varve under study sit in this spectrum of change? The answer is generally unknown within adequate accuracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Ball</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/#comment-193735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvin Ball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6981#comment-193735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;the brave field of sedimentology.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is that, like, naturopathic medicine, or something? Y&#039;know, like Dead Sea facial muds or something like that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the brave field of sedimentology.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is that, like, naturopathic medicine, or something? Y&#8217;know, like Dead Sea facial muds or something like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven mosher</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/#comment-193734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steven mosher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6981#comment-193734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-355778&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John M (#78)&lt;/a&gt;,

Mann said with a grin
As he worked on his spin
This Cherry&#039;s  so ripe I must pluck it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-355778" rel="nofollow">John M (#78)</a>,</p>
<p>Mann said with a grin<br />
As he worked on his spin<br />
This Cherry&#8217;s  so ripe I must pluck it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlc</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/#comment-193733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6981#comment-193733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John S:  Sorry, I didn&#039;t mean to imply disillusion with CA.  I plead poetic licence!

Bender:  precisely my point - there may be some ancient varves that can be used as temperature proxies, but certainly not all (many) and who is to judge which ones are appropriate.

&lt;em&gt;On varves, I have no position
this is my humble admission
They measure the height
That seems about right
Who gives a s**t about deposition&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John S:  Sorry, I didn&#8217;t mean to imply disillusion with CA.  I plead poetic licence!</p>
<p>Bender:  precisely my point &#8211; there may be some ancient varves that can be used as temperature proxies, but certainly not all (many) and who is to judge which ones are appropriate.</p>
<p><em>On varves, I have no position<br />
this is my humble admission<br />
They measure the height<br />
That seems about right<br />
Who gives a s**t about deposition</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/07/kaufmans-stick-iceberg-lake-varves/#comment-193732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=6981#comment-193732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-355777&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;steven mosher (#77)&lt;/a&gt;,

They said with a grin
As they worked on their spin
This grant is so ripe we can pluck it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-355777" rel="nofollow">steven mosher (#77)</a>,</p>
<p>They said with a grin<br />
As they worked on their spin<br />
This grant is so ripe we can pluck it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
