<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overpeck&#8217;s Enigmatic Tuq(?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/22/overpecks-greenland-contribution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/22/overpecks-greenland-contribution/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:13:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete m</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/22/overpecks-greenland-contribution/#comment-194330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pete m]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7100#comment-194330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-356836&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Andrew (#1)&lt;/a&gt;,

Steve:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Tugtutog: Microliminated; 14C chronology completed; chironomid analyses pending&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I found this more interesting - is this acknowledgment of a medieval warm period???  And note the GCM reference.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Priority will be on the 400-year-long interval between 850
and 1250 AD. This period is probably the longest interval of relative warmth during the last 2
kyr and is bounded by pronounced cooling events, which might help to synchronize our records;
it will also be a focus of our GCM experiments. Please make a strong effort to complete
geochronological and proxy analyses at the highest-possible resolution over this interval of your
lake records during the coming year.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-356836" rel="nofollow">Andrew (#1)</a>,</p>
<p>Steve:</p>
<blockquote><p>Tugtutog: Microliminated; 14C chronology completed; chironomid analyses pending</p></blockquote>
<p>I found this more interesting &#8211; is this acknowledgment of a medieval warm period???  And note the GCM reference.</p>
<blockquote><p>Priority will be on the 400-year-long interval between 850<br />
and 1250 AD. This period is probably the longest interval of relative warmth during the last 2<br />
kyr and is bounded by pronounced cooling events, which might help to synchronize our records;<br />
it will also be a focus of our GCM experiments. Please make a strong effort to complete<br />
geochronological and proxy analyses at the highest-possible resolution over this interval of your<br />
lake records during the coming year.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjm</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/22/overpecks-greenland-contribution/#comment-194329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pjm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7100#comment-194329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Presumably Tuq or Tug is an abbreviation for Tuqtotog (Lake). [ &lt;strong&gt;Steve&lt;/strong&gt; - this we already presumed]

Archive time? Overtime for Overpeck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably Tuq or Tug is an abbreviation for Tuqtotog (Lake). [ <strong>Steve</strong> - this we already presumed]</p>
<p>Archive time? Overtime for Overpeck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernie</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/22/overpecks-greenland-contribution/#comment-194328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bernie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7100#comment-194328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enigmatic seems too benign.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enigmatic seems too benign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/22/overpecks-greenland-contribution/#comment-194327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7100#comment-194327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Tugtutog: chironomid analyses pending
Sved Lake: ongoing midge work&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&quot;chironomids&quot; are &quot;midges&quot;, &quot;analyses&quot; means &quot;work&quot; and &quot;pending&quot; means &quot;ongoing&quot;.
Meaning: &quot;my dog ate it&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Tugtutog: chironomid analyses pending<br />
Sved Lake: ongoing midge work</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;chironomids&#8221; are &#8220;midges&#8221;, &#8220;analyses&#8221; means &#8220;work&#8221; and &#8220;pending&#8221; means &#8220;ongoing&#8221;.<br />
Meaning: &#8220;my dog ate it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/22/overpecks-greenland-contribution/#comment-194326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7100#comment-194326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To paraphrase the bandit chief&#039;s words in Treasure Of The Sierra Madre:&quot; Badges? We ain&#039;t got no badges. We don&#039;t need no badges. I don&#039;t have to show you any stinking badges. &quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase the bandit chief&#8217;s words in Treasure Of The Sierra Madre:&#8221; Badges? We ain&#8217;t got no badges. We don&#8217;t need no badges. I don&#8217;t have to show you any stinking badges. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/22/overpecks-greenland-contribution/#comment-194325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7100#comment-194325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you typoed in the title Steve. It&#039;s not &quot;tuq&quot; but &quot;tug&quot; right?
&lt;strong&gt;
Steve:&lt;/strong&gt; Dunno. Perhaps you can direct me to the archive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you typoed in the title Steve. It&#8217;s not &#8220;tuq&#8221; but &#8220;tug&#8221; right?<br />
<strong><br />
Steve:</strong> Dunno. Perhaps you can direct me to the archive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
