is an engaging account by Rick Trebino of Georgia Tech on his experience in trying to publish a scientific comment in a field far less controversial than climate science. Readers can doubtless think of analogous experience in climate science. (h/t Chas)
Trebino was stonewalled by the authors when he sought data and methods – again readers can doubtless think of analgous situations.
Trebino closes by reflecting on how matters might be improved – his first recommendation is compulsory archiving of data and parameters as a condition of journal publication and a sanction of misconduct for authors refusing to provide to so after publication.