http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/ by Steve McIntyre Sat, 25 May 2013 13:38:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/#comment-334626 Tue, 22 May 2012 13:25:43 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229#comment-334626 [...] [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/#comment-332693 Mon, 07 May 2012 05:25:33 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229#comment-332693 [...] all of the supposedly “independent” IPCC multiproxy studies (see an October 2009 discussion here) and because it is particularly influential in contributing an HS-shape to the studies that do not [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/#comment-332599 Sun, 06 May 2012 18:13:13 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229#comment-332599 [...] of the supposedly “independent” IPCC multiproxy studies (see an October 2009 discussion here) and because it is particularly influential in contributing an HS-shape to the studies that do not [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/#comment-328803 Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:45:14 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229#comment-328803 [...] hockey stick shape if a little data from the same area was added. This series has been used in a dozen reconstructions. Is it any surprise those reconstructions got the same result as Mann got? All this [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/#comment-259555 Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:47:59 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229#comment-259555 [...] I refer readers to last week’s analysis on this topic and my original post on this topic here. Briffa’s online articles on the Yamal chronology (and by “Briffa”, I include [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/#comment-259550 Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:47:22 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229#comment-259550 [...] considered the impact of Yamal on other multiproxy studies in a CA post here, which is, unfortunately, not linked in the corresponding Briffa comment. There are many points of [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/#comment-259539 Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:35:18 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229#comment-259539 [...] I’ve observed on a number of occasions that the difference between Polar Urals and Yamal is, by itself, material to most of the non-bristlecone reconstructions that supposedly “support” the Hockey Stick. For example, in June 2006, I showed the direct impact of a simple sensitivity study using Polar Urals versus Yamal – an issue also recently discussed here. [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/#comment-234796 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:43:13 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229#comment-234796 [...] this topic in October 2009 in two posts during the pre-Climategate Yamal controversy ( Sept 29 here and Oct 28 here, responding to Briffa’s post on the topic [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/#comment-195930 Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:35:20 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229#comment-195930 [...] http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229 [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/29/the-impact-of-yamal-on-the-spaghetti-graph/#comment-195929 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:30:15 +0000 http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7229#comment-195929 [...] I’ve observed on a number of occasions that the difference between Polar Urals and Yamal is, by itself, material to most of the non-bristlecone reconstructions that supposedly "support" the Hockey Stick. For example, in June 2006, I showed the direct impact of a simple sensitivity study using Polar Urals versus Yamal – an issue also recently discussed here. [...]

]]>