<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Register picks up the Yamal story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Williams</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/#comment-196392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7244#comment-196392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[link here
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/an-inconvenient-truce-as-green/story-e6frfhqf-1225783524958]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>link here<br />
<a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/an-inconvenient-truce-as-green/story-e6frfhqf-1225783524958" rel="nofollow">http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/an-inconvenient-truce-as-green/story-e6frfhqf-1225783524958</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Williams</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/#comment-196391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7244#comment-196391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Bolt from the Herald Sun in Australia has picked up the story &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/an-inconvenient-truce-as-green/story-e6frfhqf-1225783524958&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Bolt from the Herald Sun in Australia has picked up the story <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/an-inconvenient-truce-as-green/story-e6frfhqf-1225783524958" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/#comment-196390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7244#comment-196390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-359836&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MikeN (#103)&lt;/a&gt;,

You can&#039;t ask Eli a question like that - the standard response is &quot;I&#039;m not going to do your homework for you&quot;.

It seems to me, that with all the papers that have been written using this Briffa data (that he got from the Russians, that wasn&#039;t his to give, yet he was able to pass on to others except Steve), that someone would want to see that the data is released, for no other reason than to defend the reconstruction.

Or as Phil Trans Royal Soc B did, to follow the rules they set forth for publication.

I mean, if Steve did publish in a &quot;peer reviewed&quot; journal (perhaps in Phil Trans Royal Soc B), would you want him to provide his code and data so it could be checked?  Or would you let him claim IP?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-359836" rel="nofollow">MikeN (#103)</a>,</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t ask Eli a question like that &#8211; the standard response is &#8220;I&#8217;m not going to do your homework for you&#8221;.</p>
<p>It seems to me, that with all the papers that have been written using this Briffa data (that he got from the Russians, that wasn&#8217;t his to give, yet he was able to pass on to others except Steve), that someone would want to see that the data is released, for no other reason than to defend the reconstruction.</p>
<p>Or as Phil Trans Royal Soc B did, to follow the rules they set forth for publication.</p>
<p>I mean, if Steve did publish in a &#8220;peer reviewed&#8221; journal (perhaps in Phil Trans Royal Soc B), would you want him to provide his code and data so it could be checked?  Or would you let him claim IP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/#comment-196389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7244#comment-196389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-360003&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Phil. (#111)&lt;/a&gt;,
I&#039;ve seen that stated before. Maybe. Do you see any words in Jerry&#039;s post that could have triggered this reaction?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-360003" rel="nofollow">Phil. (#111)</a>,<br />
I&#8217;ve seen that stated before. Maybe. Do you see any words in Jerry&#8217;s post that could have triggered this reaction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil.</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/#comment-196388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7244#comment-196388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-359983&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bender (#110)&lt;/a&gt;,

One thing that causes problems with posts there sometimes is the spam checker, I had a post rejected because I used the word &#039;ambient&#039; because it includes the name of a drug,  others have had problems because they used the word &#039;specialist&#039; for the same reason.  It took a while to find out why those posts had disappeared into limbo.

[&lt;strong&gt;Jean S&lt;/strong&gt;: This comment was considered &quot;spam&quot; by the CA spam filter :)]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-359983" rel="nofollow">bender (#110)</a>,</p>
<p>One thing that causes problems with posts there sometimes is the spam checker, I had a post rejected because I used the word &#8216;ambient&#8217; because it includes the name of a drug,  others have had problems because they used the word &#8216;specialist&#8217; for the same reason.  It took a while to find out why those posts had disappeared into limbo.</p>
<p>[<strong>Jean S</strong>: This comment was considered "spam" by the CA spam filter <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/#comment-196387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7244#comment-196387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-359939&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bart Verheggen (#109)&lt;/a&gt;,
You just sounded so authoritative on their censorship policy. There is another poster this morning claiming they can&#039;t get through to clarify what McIntyre really said. Why would Gavin prevent the reporting of facts that are on the record, when he has reported othwerwise? Hmmm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-359939" rel="nofollow">Bart Verheggen (#109)</a>,<br />
You just sounded so authoritative on their censorship policy. There is another poster this morning claiming they can&#8217;t get through to clarify what McIntyre really said. Why would Gavin prevent the reporting of facts that are on the record, when he has reported othwerwise? Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Verheggen</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/#comment-196386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bart Verheggen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7244#comment-196386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bender,
(107, 108) I&#039;m afraid you&#039;re asking the wrong person.
(106) I guess I misunderstood what is meant by the term &quot;drive-by behavior&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bender,<br />
(107, 108) I&#8217;m afraid you&#8217;re asking the wrong person.<br />
(106) I guess I misunderstood what is meant by the term &#8220;drive-by behavior&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/#comment-196385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7244#comment-196385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... and maybe you can ask Eli where the data are that MikeN is looking for?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and maybe you can ask Eli where the data are that MikeN is looking for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/#comment-196384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7244#comment-196384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-359924&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bart Verheggen (#105)&lt;/a&gt;,
Why don&#039;t you clarify their editorial policy? Where can Jerry post his question and initiate a discussion?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-359924" rel="nofollow">Bart Verheggen (#105)</a>,<br />
Why don&#8217;t you clarify their editorial policy? Where can Jerry post his question and initiate a discussion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/09/30/the-register-picks-up-the-yamal-story/#comment-196383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7244#comment-196383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-359924&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bart Verheggen (#105)&lt;/a&gt;,
No, that is not what I said and not what I meant at all. They love one-time callers, regardless what camp they&#039;re in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-359924" rel="nofollow">Bart Verheggen (#105)</a>,<br />
No, that is not what I said and not what I meant at all. They love one-time callers, regardless what camp they&#8217;re in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
