<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Satellite Adjustments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.M.Smith</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/#comment-200441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.M.Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7569#comment-200441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FWIW, the &quot;methods, code, and data&quot; for everything I&#039;m doing is available for public review.  I put the most important bits in the postings, only holding back those bits that IMO would not interest anyone.  Every so often I package those up and make a boring &quot;documenting what I did&quot; posting if it looks like a good idea.

I have made a tarball of the runnable GIStemp (RedHat 7.2 development system, but it ought to run on most Unix / Linux boxes) and have a place that has given me the &quot;OK&quot; to put it up for FTP download, but just have not had the time.  I&#039;ve been rather busy discovering, well, &quot;little things&quot;, like that California has exactly 4 thermometers use since 2007.  One is in San Francisco.  The other three are on the beach in southern California (Santa Maria, San Diego, L.A.).

http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/ghcn-california-on-the-beach-who-needs-snow/

The validation of this finding was done (see comments) with a completely independent trial on entirely different hardware, software, and methods by a third party.  In the article (and related articles on Brazil, Argentina, China, Canada, Australia, and more as I work through the globe) you will find the 3rd party code for doing it on a PC with Windows and my Linux / Unix commands.

Realize that this particular investigation is NOT GIStemp.  It is an investigation into the GHCN data set pre-GIStemp.  It is strongly related to GIStemp, in that it shows that a failure to do proper maintenance programming on GIStemp has caused the GHCN thermometer deletions to gut the list of stations used by GIStemp.  (USHCN shifted to USHCN.v2 in 2007 and GIStemp did not.  So it only loads the old USHCN file and as a results, cuts off US History in 2007.  GHCN drops most US stations then, too, and leaves the USA with all of 136 thermometers for the whole place.  Down from 1850 at peak).

BTW, any one who can do FTP and use Linux / Unix &quot;grep&quot; and &quot;wc&quot; commands can duplicate this on any Linux / Unix machine.  Heck, you could even do it with a text editor and patient counting of the 2009 records by hand.

FWIW, I sometimes lurk at this site, but time limits my participation in comments.

E.M.Smith, The Chiefio

Sidebar Postscript:  If anyone would like help installing a copy of GIStemp I would be more than happy to help.  If out of the &quot;middle of California&quot; area any site visit would require gas money and a free lunch ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, the &#8220;methods, code, and data&#8221; for everything I&#8217;m doing is available for public review.  I put the most important bits in the postings, only holding back those bits that IMO would not interest anyone.  Every so often I package those up and make a boring &#8220;documenting what I did&#8221; posting if it looks like a good idea.</p>
<p>I have made a tarball of the runnable GIStemp (RedHat 7.2 development system, but it ought to run on most Unix / Linux boxes) and have a place that has given me the &#8220;OK&#8221; to put it up for FTP download, but just have not had the time.  I&#8217;ve been rather busy discovering, well, &#8220;little things&#8221;, like that California has exactly 4 thermometers use since 2007.  One is in San Francisco.  The other three are on the beach in southern California (Santa Maria, San Diego, L.A.).</p>
<p><a href="http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/ghcn-california-on-the-beach-who-needs-snow/" rel="nofollow">http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/ghcn-california-on-the-beach-who-needs-snow/</a></p>
<p>The validation of this finding was done (see comments) with a completely independent trial on entirely different hardware, software, and methods by a third party.  In the article (and related articles on Brazil, Argentina, China, Canada, Australia, and more as I work through the globe) you will find the 3rd party code for doing it on a PC with Windows and my Linux / Unix commands.</p>
<p>Realize that this particular investigation is NOT GIStemp.  It is an investigation into the GHCN data set pre-GIStemp.  It is strongly related to GIStemp, in that it shows that a failure to do proper maintenance programming on GIStemp has caused the GHCN thermometer deletions to gut the list of stations used by GIStemp.  (USHCN shifted to USHCN.v2 in 2007 and GIStemp did not.  So it only loads the old USHCN file and as a results, cuts off US History in 2007.  GHCN drops most US stations then, too, and leaves the USA with all of 136 thermometers for the whole place.  Down from 1850 at peak).</p>
<p>BTW, any one who can do FTP and use Linux / Unix &#8220;grep&#8221; and &#8220;wc&#8221; commands can duplicate this on any Linux / Unix machine.  Heck, you could even do it with a text editor and patient counting of the 2009 records by hand.</p>
<p>FWIW, I sometimes lurk at this site, but time limits my participation in comments.</p>
<p>E.M.Smith, The Chiefio</p>
<p>Sidebar Postscript:  If anyone would like help installing a copy of GIStemp I would be more than happy to help.  If out of the &#8220;middle of California&#8221; area any site visit would require gas money and a free lunch <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Cram</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/#comment-200440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Cram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7569#comment-200440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-363414&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rob R (#42)&lt;/a&gt;,

Thanks for mentioning &quot;Musings from the Chiefio.&quot;  I have glanced at a few articles and found them interesting and well written.

Steve, would you consider putting &lt;a href=&quot;http://chiefio.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EM Smith&lt;/a&gt; on the blogroll?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-363414" rel="nofollow">Rob R (#42)</a>,</p>
<p>Thanks for mentioning &#8220;Musings from the Chiefio.&#8221;  I have glanced at a few articles and found them interesting and well written.</p>
<p>Steve, would you consider putting <a href="http://chiefio.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">EM Smith</a> on the blogroll?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minimalist bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/#comment-200439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[minimalist bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7569#comment-200439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I linked to the actual reply at the old &quot;Keith Briffa responds&quot; thread.
Thanks to BCL for the heads-up. No thanks for the spin &amp; failure to link to the source.
Briffa is way OT here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I linked to the actual reply at the old &#8220;Keith Briffa responds&#8221; thread.<br />
Thanks to BCL for the heads-up. No thanks for the spin &amp; failure to link to the source.<br />
Briffa is way OT here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jennings</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/#comment-200438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Jennings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7569#comment-200438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-363489&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bigcitylib (#51)&lt;/a&gt;,

If you think I would read anything you post and take it seriously, you are out of your &quot;open mind&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-363489" rel="nofollow">bigcitylib (#51)</a>,</p>
<p>If you think I would read anything you post and take it seriously, you are out of your &#8220;open mind&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigcitylib</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/#comment-200437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigcitylib]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7569#comment-200437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bit OT but Briffa has issued a further response to the Yamal silliness.  Mc used a biased sample.  Who would have thunk it?

http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com/2009/10/briffa-mark-ii-mcintyre-used-biased.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit OT but Briffa has issued a further response to the Yamal silliness.  Mc used a biased sample.  Who would have thunk it?</p>
<p><a href="http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com/2009/10/briffa-mark-ii-mcintyre-used-biased.html" rel="nofollow">http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com/2009/10/briffa-mark-ii-mcintyre-used-biased.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff id</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/#comment-200436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff id]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7569#comment-200436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An update based on comments from Dr. Christy.

http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/satellite-temps-getting-closer/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update based on comments from Dr. Christy.</p>
<p><a href="http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/satellite-temps-getting-closer/" rel="nofollow">http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/satellite-temps-getting-closer/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Morris</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/#comment-200435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold Morris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7569#comment-200435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-363414&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rob R (#42)&lt;/a&gt;,

Amazing bit of reading.  It certainly opens up a can of worms for station selection issues.  I hope that Anthony is on to this and that he gets real friendly with this fellow.  They would seem to make an excellent duo.

Thanks for this tip Rob R]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-363414" rel="nofollow">Rob R (#42)</a>,</p>
<p>Amazing bit of reading.  It certainly opens up a can of worms for station selection issues.  I hope that Anthony is on to this and that he gets real friendly with this fellow.  They would seem to make an excellent duo.</p>
<p>Thanks for this tip Rob R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Sherrington</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/#comment-200434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff Sherrington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7569#comment-200434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Showing my increasing confidence in understanding climate statistics, if I was one of the experts given the test, I would ask &quot;Are these numbers independent of each other?&quot; The primary reason is explained by &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-363260&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ron Cram (#10)&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Showing my increasing confidence in understanding climate statistics, if I was one of the experts given the test, I would ask &#8220;Are these numbers independent of each other?&#8221; The primary reason is explained by <a href="#comment-363260" rel="nofollow">Ron Cram (#10)</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Follow the Money</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/#comment-200433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Follow the Money]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7569#comment-200433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have reviewed some of Seth Borenstein&#039;s work, and conclude much of the cause behind this problematicly constructed piece is that he is having a crisis of faith.  He is a sincere believer.  Exhibit A, this recent lede:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The nation&#039;s top climate scientists are giving &quot;An Inconvenient Truth,&quot; Al Gore&#039;s documentary on global warming, five stars for accuracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have reviewed some of Seth Borenstein&#8217;s work, and conclude much of the cause behind this problematicly constructed piece is that he is having a crisis of faith.  He is a sincere believer.  Exhibit A, this recent lede:</p>
<blockquote><p>The nation&#8217;s top climate scientists are giving &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth,&#8221; Al Gore&#8217;s documentary on global warming, five stars for accuracy.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonicfrog</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/10/26/satellite-adjustments/#comment-200432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonicfrog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7569#comment-200432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-363339&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nanny_govt_sucks (#27)&lt;/a&gt;,

Nice catch. I missed that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: <a href="#comment-363339" rel="nofollow">nanny_govt_sucks (#27)</a>,</p>
<p>Nice catch. I missed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
