<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Curry: On the credibility of climate research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 00:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pannell Discussions &#187; 165 &#8211; ClimateGate part 3: Reactions and implications</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/#comment-314902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pannell Discussions &#187; 165 &#8211; ClimateGate part 3: Reactions and implications]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7826#comment-314902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] scientists have come out acknowledging that the emails reveal serious problems in their discipline (here, here). George Manbiot of the Guardian newspaper, who is very strongly pro-warming and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scientists have come out acknowledging that the emails reveal serious problems in their discipline (here, here). George Manbiot of the Guardian newspaper, who is very strongly pro-warming and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClimateGate, Christianity, and Politics &#124; The Emerging Scholars Blog</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/#comment-260508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClimateGate, Christianity, and Politics &#124; The Emerging Scholars Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7826#comment-260508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Georgia Tech, a climatologist who has gained a reputation for engaging climate change skeptics, has written that &#8220;climate tribalism&#8221; could seriously damage the scientific process and the public [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Georgia Tech, a climatologist who has gained a reputation for engaging climate change skeptics, has written that &#8220;climate tribalism&#8221; could seriously damage the scientific process and the public [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Climate Hack Story, Could Talk of Cover-Up Be as Serious as Crime? &#124; Probe International</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/#comment-252003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[In Climate Hack Story, Could Talk of Cover-Up Be as Serious as Crime? &#124; Probe International]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7826#comment-252003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Given the importance of East Anglia’s data and correspondence in shaping climate policy, including via IPCC reports, some mainstream scientists now say they find the evidence of efforts at data withholding troubling. “The problem seems to be that the circling of the wagons strategy developed by small groups of climate researchers in response to the politically motivated attacks,” Judith Curry, a climatologist at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta wrote in an internet posting this week. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Given the importance of East Anglia’s data and correspondence in shaping climate policy, including via IPCC reports, some mainstream scientists now say they find the evidence of efforts at data withholding troubling. “The problem seems to be that the circling of the wagons strategy developed by small groups of climate researchers in response to the politically motivated attacks,” Judith Curry, a climatologist at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta wrote in an internet posting this week. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Manger &#187; Climategate: why it matters</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/#comment-232277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Manger &#187; Climategate: why it matters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7826#comment-232277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] AGW hypothesis — see Judy Curry&#8217;s  open letter on the Climate Progress website; also her  post on Climate Audit), the line was changed to, &#8220;this is just a few scientists behaving [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AGW hypothesis — see Judy Curry&#8217;s  open letter on the Climate Progress website; also her  post on Climate Audit), the line was changed to, &#8220;this is just a few scientists behaving [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collide-a-scape &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Collide-a-scape &#62;&#62; An Inconvenient Provocateur</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/#comment-228585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collide-a-scape &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Collide-a-scape &#62;&#62; An Inconvenient Provocateur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7826#comment-228585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] has engaged her peers, critics, and the public at well known web outlets, such as Climateprogress, Climateaudit, and Dot Earth, among others. Additionally, she has been a participant in lively comment threads [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has engaged her peers, critics, and the public at well known web outlets, such as Climateprogress, Climateaudit, and Dot Earth, among others. Additionally, she has been a participant in lively comment threads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collide-a-scape &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Collide-a-scape &#62;&#62; Some Spicy Curry</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/#comment-228145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collide-a-scape &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Collide-a-scape &#62;&#62; Some Spicy Curry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 03:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7826#comment-228145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] whose  outspoken commentary on Climategate has put her at odds with many of her colleagues. (See here, here, and here, for Curry&#8217;s most recent and widely circulated essays on the issue of climate [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whose  outspoken commentary on Climategate has put her at odds with many of her colleagues. (See here, here, and here, for Curry&#8217;s most recent and widely circulated essays on the issue of climate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collide-a-scape &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Collide-a-scape &#62;&#62; Choosing Sides</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/#comment-227711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collide-a-scape &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Collide-a-scape &#62;&#62; Choosing Sides]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7826#comment-227711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and manipulated by Morano? Yes. Does this mean Revkin was wrong to delve into issues raised by Judith Curry and Mike Hulme? No, not even in the wake of the latest news. Still, you get the feeling from RC and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and manipulated by Morano? Yes. Does this mean Revkin was wrong to delve into issues raised by Judith Curry and Mike Hulme? No, not even in the wake of the latest news. Still, you get the feeling from RC and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s not the PR, It&#8217;s the Practice, Stupid &#171; SoftestPawn&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/#comment-225734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not the PR, It&#8217;s the Practice, Stupid &#171; SoftestPawn&#8217;s Weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7826#comment-225734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] contrast, circling the wagons and &#8216;protecting&#8217; the work from public scrutiny, in order to defend it against hostile [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contrast, circling the wagons and &#8216;protecting&#8217; the work from public scrutiny, in order to defend it against hostile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Credibility of Climate Research, Part II: Towards Rebuilding Trust &#124; NW0.eu</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/#comment-224075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[On the Credibility of Climate Research, Part II: Towards Rebuilding Trust &#124; NW0.eu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7826#comment-224075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] participant in the blogosphere since 2006, and recently posted two essays on climategate, one at climateaudit.org and the other at climateprogress.org. Both essays were subsequently picked up by other blogs, and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] participant in the blogosphere since 2006, and recently posted two essays on climategate, one at climateaudit.org and the other at climateprogress.org. Both essays were subsequently picked up by other blogs, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Credibility of Climate Research, Part II: Towards Rebuilding Trust &#124; Disinformation</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/#comment-223664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[On the Credibility of Climate Research, Part II: Towards Rebuilding Trust &#124; Disinformation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7826#comment-223664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] participant in the blogosphere since 2006, and recently posted two essays on climategate, one at climateaudit.org and the other at climateprogress.org. Both essays were subsequently picked up by other blogs, and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] participant in the blogosphere since 2006, and recently posted two essays on climategate, one at climateaudit.org and the other at climateprogress.org. Both essays were subsequently picked up by other blogs, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

