<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Denying Email Deletion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;infog&#8221; of &#8220;Goldielocksian transformation&#8221; &#8230; &#124; pindanpost</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/#comment-344270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8220;infog&#8221; of &#8220;Goldielocksian transformation&#8221; &#8230; &#124; pindanpost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camirror.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-344270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] guess Karoly has been taking lessons on honesty in climate communications from Phil Jones.  By Steve McIntyre &#124; Posted in Uncategorized &#124; Tagged gergis, karoly &#124; Comments [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guess Karoly has been taking lessons on honesty in climate communications from Phil Jones.  By Steve McIntyre | Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged gergis, karoly | Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was Gergis et al &#8220;Withdrawn&#8221;? &#171; Climate Audit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/#comment-344203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Was Gergis et al &#8220;Withdrawn&#8221;? &#171; Climate Audit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camirror.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-344203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] guess Karoly has been taking lessons on honesty in climate communications from Phil Jones.         Like this:LikeBe the first to like this.   This entry was written by Steve [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guess Karoly has been taking lessons on honesty in climate communications from Phil Jones.         Like this:LikeBe the first to like this.   This entry was written by Steve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Gatekeepers &#171; the Air Vent</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/#comment-208425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climate Gatekeepers &#171; the Air Vent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camirror.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-208425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Phil Jones said the same thing to the press- We’ve not deleted any emails or data here at CRU. But the quote doesn&#8217;t hold up with the facts. Denying Email Deletion [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phil Jones said the same thing to the press- We’ve not deleted any emails or data here at CRU. But the quote doesn&#8217;t hold up with the facts. Denying Email Deletion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climategate Professor to Skeptic on Live BBC TV: ‘What an Assh*le’ &#124; The Aperio Movement</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/#comment-204970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climategate Professor to Skeptic on Live BBC TV: ‘What an Assh*le’ &#124; The Aperio Movement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camirror.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-204970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Jones, the man at the has left many unanswered questions about his actions. See: Caught in Another Untruth? THEN: UN IPCC&#8217;s Phil Jones, Dec 3, 2008: &#8216;About 2 months ago ...NOW: UN IPCC&#8217;s Phil Jones, Nov 24, 2009: &#8216;We&#8217;ve not deleted any emails or data [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jones, the man at the has left many unanswered questions about his actions. See: Caught in Another Untruth? THEN: UN IPCC&#8217;s Phil Jones, Dec 3, 2008: &#8216;About 2 months ago &#8230;NOW: UN IPCC&#8217;s Phil Jones, Nov 24, 2009: &#8216;We&#8217;ve not deleted any emails or data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John O'Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/#comment-204969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John O'Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camirror.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-204969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At last the mouthpiece of the British government, that once venerable institution the BBC, grows some stones and speaks candidly on ClimateGate in a well-considered article on their website....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8388485.stm

Mike Hulme and Jerome Ravetz  ( famous for the quote:&quot;Wherever there&#039;s a system, there&#039;s a racket to beat it.&quot;) have been granted a momentous public platform to plead the case for reform of the scientific process. In a clear acknowledgement to the invaluable public service that the blogosphere ( most obviously Climate Audit and Wattsupwiththat) the very thoughtful and wordy piece knocks into a cocked hat all the usual drivel written by most &#039;environment correspondents&#039; from the mainstream media.

At last there appears a chink of light to guide the public out of the murk created by the IPCC and vested political lobbyists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last the mouthpiece of the British government, that once venerable institution the BBC, grows some stones and speaks candidly on ClimateGate in a well-considered article on their website&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8388485.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8388485.stm</a></p>
<p>Mike Hulme and Jerome Ravetz  ( famous for the quote:&#8221;Wherever there&#8217;s a system, there&#8217;s a racket to beat it.&#8221;) have been granted a momentous public platform to plead the case for reform of the scientific process. In a clear acknowledgement to the invaluable public service that the blogosphere ( most obviously Climate Audit and Wattsupwiththat) the very thoughtful and wordy piece knocks into a cocked hat all the usual drivel written by most &#8216;environment correspondents&#8217; from the mainstream media.</p>
<p>At last there appears a chink of light to guide the public out of the murk created by the IPCC and vested political lobbyists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fai Mao</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/#comment-204967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fai Mao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camirror.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-204967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What &quot;L&quot; word would that be Robert?

I&#039;m a librarian and get touchy about such things]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8220;L&#8221; word would that be Robert?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a librarian and get touchy about such things</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UN scientists turn on each other: UN Scientist Declares Climategate colleagues Mann, Jones and Rahmstorf ’should be barred from the IPCC process’ — They are ‘not credible any more’ &#124; Conspiratorium 101</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/#comment-204965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UN scientists turn on each other: UN Scientist Declares Climategate colleagues Mann, Jones and Rahmstorf ’should be barred from the IPCC process’ — They are ‘not credible any more’ &#124; Conspiratorium 101]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camirror.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-204965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Caught in Another Untruth? THEN: UN IPCC&#8217;s Phil Jones, Dec 3, 2008: &#8216;About 2 months ago ...NOW: UN IPCC&#8217;s Phil Jones, Nov 24, 2009: &#8216;We&#8217;ve not deleted any emails or data here at CRU&#8217; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Caught in Another Untruth? THEN: UN IPCC&#8217;s Phil Jones, Dec 3, 2008: &#8216;About 2 months ago &#8230;NOW: UN IPCC&#8217;s Phil Jones, Nov 24, 2009: &#8216;We&#8217;ve not deleted any emails or data here at CRU&#8217; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will H.</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/#comment-204964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camirror.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-204964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[snip - too angry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>snip &#8211; too angry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wood</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/#comment-204963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Wood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camirror.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-204963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, at some point, the Had Crew will be required to produce the original data, when this comes to court. And it will.

Their only defense is that the dog ate the data. Otherwise the Had Crew have erased the original data. This is the only possible explanation if they do not produce it. Forget thee-mails, secondary; look at the S/W code: a disgrace.

But, also, bear in mind one more point. When one is accused of fraud, or cheating, or lying, in the UK, you can always resort to slander and liberl laws. The fact that these lying, fraudulent crimatologists haven&#039;t done this is an admittal of their guilt.

Burn in hell, crimatalogists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, at some point, the Had Crew will be required to produce the original data, when this comes to court. And it will.</p>
<p>Their only defense is that the dog ate the data. Otherwise the Had Crew have erased the original data. This is the only possible explanation if they do not produce it. Forget thee-mails, secondary; look at the S/W code: a disgrace.</p>
<p>But, also, bear in mind one more point. When one is accused of fraud, or cheating, or lying, in the UK, you can always resort to slander and liberl laws. The fact that these lying, fraudulent crimatologists haven&#8217;t done this is an admittal of their guilt.</p>
<p>Burn in hell, crimatalogists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Wood</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/11/24/denying-email-deletion/#comment-204962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Wood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://camirror.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-204962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please Sir? (Hand up as far as it can reach from the back of the class) can I use the L-word now??!!

Like post-factum you know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please Sir? (Hand up as far as it can reach from the back of the class) can I use the L-word now??!!</p>
<p>Like post-factum you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
