http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/ by Steve McIntyre Sat, 18 May 2013 06:01:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-356038 Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:12:26 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-356038 [...] S&R contacted Steve McIntyre for his views on the CRU emails. While he was terse in his email communications, he suggested that his writings at Climate Audit were a good place to start. In December of 2009, shortly after the emails were published, McIntyre wrote that climate scientists say that the “trick” is now being taken out of context. The Climategate Letters show clearly that the relevant context is the IPCC Lead Authors’ meeting in Tanzania in September 1999 at which the decline in the Briffa reconstruction [of tree ring data] was perceived by IPCC as “diluting the message”, as a “problem”, as a “potential distraction/detraction”.(source) [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-353946 Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:14:17 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-353946 [...] scientific malfeasance against CRU’s Phil Jones and Keith Briffa from the beginning. And even Chip Knappenberger rejected Steve McIntyre’s “analysis” of the Climategate email e… concerning the IPCC TAR chart that showed reconstructions by Briffa and Jones, along with the MBH99 [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-328422 Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:49:30 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-328422 [...] is exacerbated by the evidence for political activism amongst some scientists and a strong drive to usurp every other problem in the world to this one rather abstract Cause [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-310547 Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:17:48 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-310547 [...] then again, the AGW scientists are prone to tricks. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. This entry was posted in [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-253356 Sat, 29 Jan 2011 02:48:00 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-253356 [...] [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-252173 Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:22:23 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-252173 [...] account of all the methods used to “hide the decline” should refer to Steve McIntyre’s extensive discussion of these [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-245666 Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:24:12 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-245666 [...] “trick” of “hiding the decline” has been discussed again and again and again, and while the wording may be regrettable, the intent was not to deceive but to keep out the data [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-243822 Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:29:19 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-243822 [...] The “trick” is a way to hide adverse data, something that scientists should never do. At least they have proven conclusively that the [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-243525 Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:46:38 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-243525 [...] scientific malfeasance? The investigators didn’t even understand that the famous “Mike’s Nature trick“was a clever way of hiding adverse data, a big scientific no-no. They didn’t interview [...]

]]> http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-234563 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:39:04 +0000 http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-234563 [...] Steve McIntyre, who is mentioned over 100 times in the leaked emails has consistently explained how this explanation is insufficient and falls flat on its [...]

]]>