<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPCC and the &#8220;Trick&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:29:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Checking The Climate Scientists &#124; cosmoscon</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-310547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Checking The Climate Scientists &#124; cosmoscon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-310547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] then again, the AGW scientists are prone to tricks. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post.   This entry was posted in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then again, the AGW scientists are prone to tricks. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post.   This entry was posted in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climategate was a whitewash - MPs admit</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-253356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climategate was a whitewash - MPs admit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 02:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-253356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climategate analysis &#171; Anti Oligarch</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-252173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climategate analysis &#171; Anti Oligarch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-252173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] account of all the methods used to “hide the decline” should refer to Steve McIntyre’s extensive discussion of these [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] account of all the methods used to “hide the decline” should refer to Steve McIntyre’s extensive discussion of these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Climategate&#8221; One Year Later: Much Ado About Next To Nothing Much &#171; The Policy Lass</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-245666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8220;Climategate&#8221; One Year Later: Much Ado About Next To Nothing Much &#171; The Policy Lass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-245666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;trick&#8221; of &#8220;hiding the decline&#8221; has been discussed again and again and again, and while the wording may be regrettable, the intent was not to deceive but to keep out the data [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;trick&#8221; of &#8220;hiding the decline&#8221; has been discussed again and again and again, and while the wording may be regrettable, the intent was not to deceive but to keep out the data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exonerated? Not. &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-243822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Exonerated? Not. &#124; Watts Up With That?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-243822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The &#8220;trick&#8221; is a way to hide adverse data, something that scientists should never do. At least they have proven conclusively that the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The &#8220;trick&#8221; is a way to hide adverse data, something that scientists should never do. At least they have proven conclusively that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mann and Donald Kennedy &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-243525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Mann and Donald Kennedy &#124; Watts Up With That?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-243525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] scientific malfeasance? The investigators didn&#8217;t even understand that the famous &#8220;Mike&#8217;s Nature trick&#8220;was a clever way of hiding adverse data, a big scientific no-no. They didn&#8217;t interview [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scientific malfeasance? The investigators didn&#8217;t even understand that the famous &#8220;Mike&#8217;s Nature trick&#8220;was a clever way of hiding adverse data, a big scientific no-no. They didn&#8217;t interview [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth Or The Fight &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Climategate Whitewash Complete: Third Inquiry Clears Everyone Involved</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-234563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Truth Or The Fight &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Climategate Whitewash Complete: Third Inquiry Clears Everyone Involved]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-234563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Steve McIntyre, who is mentioned over 100 times in the leaked emails has consistently explained how this explanation is insufficient and falls flat on its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve McIntyre, who is mentioned over 100 times in the leaked emails has consistently explained how this explanation is insufficient and falls flat on its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClimateGate Whitewash Complete: A Third Inquiry Clears Everyone &#171; The Tonka Report</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-234541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClimateGate Whitewash Complete: A Third Inquiry Clears Everyone &#171; The Tonka Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-234541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Steve McIntyre, who is mentioned over 100 times in the leaked emails has consistently explained how this explanation is insufficient and falls flat on its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve McIntyre, who is mentioned over 100 times in the leaked emails has consistently explained how this explanation is insufficient and falls flat on its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-234434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-234434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve,

Re: Your Dec 11 edit.  You are missing the ending square bracket from the &quot;ellipsis&quot; edit of the Folland quote.

&quot;The tree ring results may still suffer from lack of multicentury time scale variance.[INSERT END BRACKET] This is probably the most important issue to resolve in Chapter 2 at present&quot;

This has (*sigh*) become an important ending bracket.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Re: Your Dec 11 edit.  You are missing the ending square bracket from the &#8220;ellipsis&#8221; edit of the Folland quote.</p>
<p>&#8220;The tree ring results may still suffer from lack of multicentury time scale variance.[INSERT END BRACKET] This is probably the most important issue to resolve in Chapter 2 at present&#8221;</p>
<p>This has (*sigh*) become an important ending bracket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V IPCC byl jen jediný solární fyzik! &#171; AntiMELOUN</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/ipcc-and-the-trick/#comment-233659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[V IPCC byl jen jediný solární fyzik! &#171; AntiMELOUN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9483#comment-233659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] IPCC tyto grafy asi schválně před čtenáři schovala podle zásady &#8220;hide the decline&#8221; (tady spíše &#8220;hide the rise&#8221;). Aby nenarušovaly strašidelný dojem blížícího se konce světa a &#8220;nemátly&#8221; čtenáře (takhle IPCC vážně uvažuje &#8211; viz). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IPCC tyto grafy asi schválně před čtenáři schovala podle zásady &#8220;hide the decline&#8221; (tady spíše &#8220;hide the rise&#8221;). Aby nenarušovaly strašidelný dojem blížícího se konce světa a &#8220;nemátly&#8221; čtenáře (takhle IPCC vážně uvažuje &#8211; viz). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

