<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weaver Solves Climategate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Dombrowski</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/#comment-211242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy Dombrowski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9463#comment-211242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody seem to have thought about a very reliable way to follow temperature variations.
The Degree/Days system that has been in use for a long time to calculate the heating needs for all buildings is probably the best way to get very good data.
The University of Oxford has a nice data set for a 20 years period from 1987 to 2006 for all of UK showing the yearly average.
The result show a cooling trend that correlate nicely with those tree rings that they tried to hide.
http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/degreedays.php
I will try to get Canada data]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody seem to have thought about a very reliable way to follow temperature variations.<br />
The Degree/Days system that has been in use for a long time to calculate the heating needs for all buildings is probably the best way to get very good data.<br />
The University of Oxford has a nice data set for a 20 years period from 1987 to 2006 for all of UK showing the yearly average.<br />
The result show a cooling trend that correlate nicely with those tree rings that they tried to hide.<br />
<a href="http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/degreedays.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/degreedays.php</a><br />
I will try to get Canada data</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yonason</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/#comment-210845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yonason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9463#comment-210845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How it&#039;s &quot;piling on&quot; to elaborate on how I agree with you I don&#039;t see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How it&#8217;s &#8220;piling on&#8221; to elaborate on how I agree with you I don&#8217;t see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yonason</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/#comment-210741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yonason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9463#comment-210741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[snip - piling on]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>snip &#8211; piling on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/#comment-209345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9463#comment-209345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correction: feel free to seek out a dendro thread and correct me there. The topic here is the Weaver break-ins.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: feel free to seek out a dendro thread and correct me there. The topic here is the Weaver break-ins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/#comment-209344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9463#comment-209344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dendros, please feel free to chime in and correct me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dendros, please feel free to chime in and correct me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bender</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/#comment-209341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9463#comment-209341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to single you out, but there have been dozens of people making identical comments in past weeks. It&#039;s a topic that has been discussed to death at CA. If you read the blog you&#039;ll see there&#039;s a wide range of commentary from insightful to useless to idiocy. For some reason climategate has given people license to post comments without actually reading the blog.
.
Treeline trees are more temperature limited than those below treeline, both in theory and in fact. But still, yes, there are other factors that limit growth, such as moisture, N and C (the latter of which are usually presumed as fixed). Univariate reconstructions are thus approximations. Dendros know this. The issue is how you go about quantifying the error and uncertainty on a mis-specified approximation. The problem is not trivial.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to single you out, but there have been dozens of people making identical comments in past weeks. It&#8217;s a topic that has been discussed to death at CA. If you read the blog you&#8217;ll see there&#8217;s a wide range of commentary from insightful to useless to idiocy. For some reason climategate has given people license to post comments without actually reading the blog.<br />
.<br />
Treeline trees are more temperature limited than those below treeline, both in theory and in fact. But still, yes, there are other factors that limit growth, such as moisture, N and C (the latter of which are usually presumed as fixed). Univariate reconstructions are thus approximations. Dendros know this. The issue is how you go about quantifying the error and uncertainty on a mis-specified approximation. The problem is not trivial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Brown</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/#comment-209332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9463#comment-209332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OT]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yonason</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/#comment-208965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yonason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9463#comment-208965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And all the time I thought it was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallagher.com/ww2/images/Kilroy_28_173.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;this guy&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And all the time I thought it was <a href="http://www.gallagher.com/ww2/images/Kilroy_28_173.jpg" rel="nofollow"><b>this guy</b></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles DrPH</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/#comment-208963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles DrPH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9463#comment-208963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Steve, that was excellent!  

I myself have read so much of the blinking CRU emails, analysis and editorializing that I&#039;m starting to go a bit batty with it all....

Some humor really helps, sir!  Cheers and best, Chuck in Chicago (Univ of Illinois)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Steve, that was excellent!  </p>
<p>I myself have read so much of the blinking CRU emails, analysis and editorializing that I&#8217;m starting to go a bit batty with it all&#8230;.</p>
<p>Some humor really helps, sir!  Cheers and best, Chuck in Chicago (Univ of Illinois)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/10/weaver-solves-climategate/#comment-208498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=9463#comment-208498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ought to credit T.S. Eliot&#039;s &quot;Book of Practical Cats&quot; for Macavity-- &quot;Cats&quot; Broadway-run lasted quite some years.  We especially appreciate &quot;Old Deuteronomy&quot; and &quot;Growl Tiger&quot; the bravo-cat, whose demise was cheered on Thames-side wharves:  &quot;Rats were roasted whole in Depford and along Victoria Dock, and a day of celebration was commanded in Bangkok.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ought to credit T.S. Eliot&#8217;s &#8220;Book of Practical Cats&#8221; for Macavity&#8211; &#8220;Cats&#8221; Broadway-run lasted quite some years.  We especially appreciate &#8220;Old Deuteronomy&#8221; and &#8220;Growl Tiger&#8221; the bravo-cat, whose demise was cheered on Thames-side wharves:  &#8220;Rats were roasted whole in Depford and along Victoria Dock, and a day of celebration was commanded in Bangkok.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
