Comments on: IEA: Hadley Center “probably tampered with Russian climate data”

By: Why all the fuss? « Climate Himalaya Initiative

Why all the fuss? « Climate Himalaya Initiative — Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:24:13 +0000

[...] http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/16/iearussia-hadley-center-probably-tampered-with-russian-climate-da… [...]

By: Spendulus

Spendulus — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:18:06 +0000

Quoting from the Met office press release of 12-18-2009

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2009/pr20091218b.html

This conclusion is in contrast to a recently released study by the Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) think tank based in Moscow. The IEA’s output is consistent with HadCRUT as they both confirm the global warming signal in this region since 1950, which we see in many other variables and has been consistently attributed to human activities

Note the statement “IEA’s output is consistent with HadCRUT….since 1950″.

Shout: The 50 years consistent
Silence: 100 years of deviation

Now why would Met do that?

By: Le ClimateGate tourne au feuilleton : les Russes confirment à présent que les scientifiques ont manipulé les données pour exagérer le réchauffement climatique « Futur Quantique

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:31:37 +0000

[...] à jour : Comme Steve McIntyre le signale sur ClimateAudit, on soupçonne depuis longtemps que le CRU a agi particulièrement vite et à la légère avec les [...]

By: The temperature chefs « TWAWKI

The temperature chefs « TWAWKI — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:05:16 +0000

[...] here, UNIPCC Ignoring China, African data sexed up, Australian data wrong, Russian data tampered with, American data inaccurate, Snow cover in South America [...]

By: Adamson

Adamson — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:14:09 +0000

This article in The Hindu (India) of Tuesday 5 January 2010 suggests that Russian scientists and the political establishment are exercising skepticism and generally lining up against AGW.

http://beta.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article75631.ece?homepage=true

By: johnh

johnh — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:24:54 +0000

It was in commas as it was implied

From the latest release of the MET office data

a network of individual land stations that has been designated by the World Meteorological Organization for use in climate monitoring.

By: Ya en 2004 estaban impidiendo las críticas “peer reviewed” a las mediciones de temperatura. « PlazaMoyua.org

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:32:37 +0000

[...] Jones. Datos también puestos ahora en cuestión desde Rusia, pero por un organismo dudoso [-->]. Según el autor del trabajo de 2004, Kamel: El resultado aquí presentado sugiere que el registro [...]

By: johnh

johnh — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:11:37 +0000

UK MET office has released a news release today referencing the IEA complaint. Some how they say the HadCRUT and IEA temps are similar and both underestimate the real warming which is now even greater than the HadCRUT/IEA.

‘The study, carried out by ECMWF (the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) with input from the Met Office, performs a new calculation of global temperature rise.’

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2009/pr20091218b.html

By: Climategatekeeping: Siberia « Climate Audit

Climategatekeeping: Siberia « Climate Audit — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:34:49 +0000

[...] the availability of new data from the UK Hadley Center in the wake of Climategate, IEA in Russia reported that CRU’s selection of Siberian stations “exaggerated” warming and recommended [...]

By: Wikipedia atacada pela cambada do ‘Aquecimento Global’ « O Vigia

Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:42:25 +0000

[...] IEA: Hadley Center “probably tampered with Russian climate data” « Climate Audit Climategate emails show that Phil Jones of CRU, acting as a reviewer of the CRU data used in the HadCRU gridded temperature, “went to town” to block the publication of criticisms of his handling of Russian data. [...]