<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supplemental Submission to Muir Russell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2010/06/10/supplemental-submission-to-muir-russell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/06/10/supplemental-submission-to-muir-russell/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:35:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde Adams III</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/06/10/supplemental-submission-to-muir-russell/#comment-231854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clyde Adams III]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11155#comment-231854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This clause seems somewhat garbled:

&quot;there is no reason to expect it to assessment of past conduct of CRU scientists&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This clause seems somewhat garbled:</p>
<p>&#8220;there is no reason to expect it to assessment of past conduct of CRU scientists&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britannic no-see-um</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/06/10/supplemental-submission-to-muir-russell/#comment-231815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Britannic no-see-um]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11155#comment-231815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Montford&#039;s Hockey Stick Illusion will surely become an all-time science classic. An amazing and beautifully written piece of investigative work explaining for the layman the scale and importance of Steve&#039;s dogged tenacity in exposing the whole epic hockey stick tale.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Montford&#8217;s Hockey Stick Illusion will surely become an all-time science classic. An amazing and beautifully written piece of investigative work explaining for the layman the scale and importance of Steve&#8217;s dogged tenacity in exposing the whole epic hockey stick tale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZT</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/06/10/supplemental-submission-to-muir-russell/#comment-231752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ZT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11155#comment-231752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seconded]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seconded</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pesadilla</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/06/10/supplemental-submission-to-muir-russell/#comment-231732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pesadilla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11155#comment-231732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have ever been on a sales course, then you will have been treated to a session on answering objections. It is well recognised that the best way to deal with an objection (without doubt) is to anticipate it.
Having read the paragraph above five or six times, i am pretty certain that the team will not be able to exclude the items that you list because they are not directly linked to the processes and procedures of the ipcc. The things that you consider to be relevent to the enquiry are the direct interactions of the uea personnel with others, no matter who they are

&quot;for acquiring, assembling, subjecting to peer review and disseminating data and research findings, and their compliance or otherwise with best scientific practice&quot;
Having said that. Brilliant anticipation Steve, you should be in sales
PS there are only three other ways of dealing with an objection 
1) answer it
2(ignore it) 
3 postphone it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have ever been on a sales course, then you will have been treated to a session on answering objections. It is well recognised that the best way to deal with an objection (without doubt) is to anticipate it.<br />
Having read the paragraph above five or six times, i am pretty certain that the team will not be able to exclude the items that you list because they are not directly linked to the processes and procedures of the ipcc. The things that you consider to be relevent to the enquiry are the direct interactions of the uea personnel with others, no matter who they are</p>
<p>&#8220;for acquiring, assembling, subjecting to peer review and disseminating data and research findings, and their compliance or otherwise with best scientific practice&#8221;<br />
Having said that. Brilliant anticipation Steve, you should be in sales<br />
PS there are only three other ways of dealing with an objection<br />
1) answer it<br />
2(ignore it)<br />
3 postphone it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Meisterling</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/06/10/supplemental-submission-to-muir-russell/#comment-231710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Meisterling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11155#comment-231710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve followed Climate Audit for a couple years, Steve, and found it both compelling and important.  What I didn&#039;t know was the enormity and quality of your work on this issue until I read &quot;The Hockey Stick Illusion&quot; by Andrew Muntford.  Of course, I&#039;m flabbergasted by what Mann and others have done in studying this issue.  What is quintessentially disconcerting is what the entire story says about the scientific community. Those who live therein ought to be ashamed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve followed Climate Audit for a couple years, Steve, and found it both compelling and important.  What I didn&#8217;t know was the enormity and quality of your work on this issue until I read &#8220;The Hockey Stick Illusion&#8221; by Andrew Muntford.  Of course, I&#8217;m flabbergasted by what Mann and others have done in studying this issue.  What is quintessentially disconcerting is what the entire story says about the scientific community. Those who live therein ought to be ashamed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/06/10/supplemental-submission-to-muir-russell/#comment-231680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11155#comment-231680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, can&#039;t resist.  All Hands on the Eel!
======================]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, can&#8217;t resist.  All Hands on the Eel!<br />
======================</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnh</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/06/10/supplemental-submission-to-muir-russell/#comment-231677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11155#comment-231677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its like holding a slippery eel, you squeeze in one spot and it starts to escape from another. Keep squeezing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its like holding a slippery eel, you squeeze in one spot and it starts to escape from another. Keep squeezing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
