<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oxburgh and the Jones Admission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/</link>
	<description>by Steve McIntyre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: It’s Time For The Person Who Leaked the CRU Emails To Step Forward.</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/#comment-402206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It’s Time For The Person Who Leaked the CRU Emails To Step Forward.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11331#comment-402206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The University of East Anglia (UEA) and Muir Russell both said the Lord Oxburgh inquiry would examine the science. At a press conference on February 11, 2010 Muir Russell said, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The University of East Anglia (UEA) and Muir Russell both said the Lord Oxburgh inquiry would examine the science. At a press conference on February 11, 2010 Muir Russell said, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Time For The Person Who Leaked the CRU Emails To Step Forward &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/#comment-401971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It&#8217;s Time For The Person Who Leaked the CRU Emails To Step Forward &#124; Watts Up With That?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11331#comment-401971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] said the Lord Oxburgh inquiry would examine the science. At a press conference on February 11, 2010 Muir Russell said, “Our job is to investigate scientific rigor, the honesty, the openness and the due process [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said the Lord Oxburgh inquiry would examine the science. At a press conference on February 11, 2010 Muir Russell said, “Our job is to investigate scientific rigor, the honesty, the openness and the due process [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unknown Skeptic &#8211; Journalism, awaiting to be freed &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/#comment-363672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Unknown Skeptic &#8211; Journalism, awaiting to be freed &#124; Watts Up With That?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 11:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11331#comment-363672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In an email exchange with Steve McIntyre, Lord Oxburgh was even more explicit: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In an email exchange with Steve McIntyre, Lord Oxburgh was even more explicit: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of Lords And Sirs, And Climategate Enquiries &#124; Omnologos</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/#comment-330847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Of Lords And Sirs, And Climategate Enquiries &#124; Omnologos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11331#comment-330847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] why should there be any surprise in Lord Oxburgh&#8217;s undermining the credibility of his own rushed-up work on Climategate, given also the fact nobody has been killed about [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] why should there be any surprise in Lord Oxburgh&#8217;s undermining the credibility of his own rushed-up work on Climategate, given also the fact nobody has been killed about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unknown Skeptic &#8211; An Essay On &#8220;Poles Apart&#8221; &#8211; 5of7 &#8211; In The Cage &#171; The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANGE</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/#comment-323642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Unknown Skeptic &#8211; An Essay On &#8220;Poles Apart&#8221; &#8211; 5of7 &#8211; In The Cage &#171; The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANGE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11331#comment-323642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] an email exchange with Steve McIntyre, Lord Oxburgh was even more explicit: “[...] as I [Lord Oxburgh] have pointed out to you previously the science was not the subject of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an email exchange with Steve McIntyre, Lord Oxburgh was even more explicit: “[...] as I [Lord Oxburgh] have pointed out to you previously the science was not the subject of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climategate Cover Up Continues With CRU Hacking Saga</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/#comment-298933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climategate Cover Up Continues With CRU Hacking Saga]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11331#comment-298933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] said the Lord Oxburgh inquiry would examine the science. At a press conference on February 11, 2010 Muir Russell said, “Our job is to investigate scientific rigor, the honesty, the openness and the due process [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said the Lord Oxburgh inquiry would examine the science. At a press conference on February 11, 2010 Muir Russell said, “Our job is to investigate scientific rigor, the honesty, the openness and the due process [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climategate Cover-up Continues</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/#comment-275371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climategate Cover-up Continues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 19:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11331#comment-275371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] said the Lord Oxburgh inquiry would examine the science. At a press conference on February 11, 2010 Muir Russell said, Our job is to investigate scientific rigor, the honesty, the openness and the due process of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said the Lord Oxburgh inquiry would examine the science. At a press conference on February 11, 2010 Muir Russell said, Our job is to investigate scientific rigor, the honesty, the openness and the due process of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate science and the litany of unaccountability &#171; Shub Niggurath Climate</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/#comment-260052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climate science and the litany of unaccountability &#171; Shub Niggurath Climate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11331#comment-260052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] malpractice in any of the work of the Climatic Research Unit&#8221;. Reason: Lord Oxburgh reveals &#8220;the science was not the subject&#8221; of study by his panel. Outcome: Decisions on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] malpractice in any of the work of the Climatic Research Unit&#8221;. Reason: Lord Oxburgh reveals &#8220;the science was not the subject&#8221; of study by his panel. Outcome: Decisions on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diccionario de escándalos del Cambio Climático (II) ¡actualizado! &#124; Pinto Pinto Gorgorito</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/#comment-248792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diccionario de escándalos del Cambio Climático (II) ¡actualizado! &#124; Pinto Pinto Gorgorito]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11331#comment-248792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Oxbourgh-gate (RPJ) y aquí (Bishop Hill) y aquí (¡Nuevo! – Climate Audit) y aquí (¡Nuevo! Climate Audit). Lord Oxburgh encubre Climategate. La propia investigación admite [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oxbourgh-gate (RPJ) y aquí (Bishop Hill) y aquí (¡Nuevo! – Climate Audit) y aquí (¡Nuevo! Climate Audit). Lord Oxburgh encubre Climategate. La propia investigación admite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Science Scandals &#8211; List Of Gates Balloons To 129!</title>
		<link>http://climateaudit.org/2010/07/01/oxburgh-and-the-jones-admission/#comment-248075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Climate Science Scandals &#8211; List Of Gates Balloons To 129!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateaudit.org/?p=11331#comment-248075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
